BJ did get to meet new chatters last night but she wasn't happy with them. So BJ decides to block them! If she's trying to make money for herself it certainly won't happen on Kick. You need an active chat to make any money BJ. Maybe she'll try TikTok tonight although I'm willing to bet the chat will be the same as Kick. Sweet dreams BJ 😴
@KT87985373 Her subs are the most manipulated people I've ever experienced! She's asking subs to buy these expensive supplies and she will sell her crafts to the same people who bought the startup equipment, what?? IMO she will find it too hard to do & then quit.
Cletus “went off the rails” on Nonsense, and she “never went after” Clue, Cletus, or Truth?
That is a fascinating rewrite. If it exists PROVE IT otherwise we''ll just add it to the very very long list of lies you've told on these people.
This was not one response to one livestream. Beginning in May, Nonsense and friends repeatedly returned to these people, assigned motives, escalated a few responses into threats and criminal-sounding conduct, dragged their friends and moderators into it, and treated speculation as evidence whenever it supported her latest storyline.
But sure. She “never went after them.” Apparently, dozens of segments do not count if you spread them across enough marathon streams.
MAY: THE “I NEVER WENT AFTER THEM” TOUR
May 5, 43:09–43:32 — Took a direct dig at Cletus, announcing that he was not a man who could tell her what to do.
May 5, 45:11–46:20 — Claimed Clue and Cletus’s side was “coming after” her (they barely even responded to her at that time) and suggested creators were afraid to speak because views and subscribers were being used as leverage.
May 5, 1:08:00–1:09:39 — Said she had zero respect for Clue, attacked Clue’s character and integrity, then suggested Clue might be bitter about losing her YouTube channel. Very restrained. Barely a mention.
May 5, 1:23:58–1:24:16 — Floated the theory that someone did not want Granny to succeed or recover money, while carefully denying she was specifically accusing Clue and Cletus. The classic “I’m not saying it was them; I’m merely describing them while saying it” maneuver.
May 5, 1:28:22–1:30:38 — Refused a group conversation by portraying the people involved as liars who scream, mention families, and gaslight.
May 6, 14:24–15:17 — Accused Truth and others of participating in a misinformation pipeline that carried unverified claims into his content.
May 6, 18:12–18:15; 2:38:56–2:39:22; 3:30:11–3:31:27 — Repeatedly said Cletus “summoned” her, screamed, cursed, and demanded that she appear on Granny’s panel. One disagreement was inflated into an ongoing domineering-man storyline.
May 6, 45:34–48:26 — Acknowledged real-life actions against Clue and Cletus, then recast their response as “vigilante justice.”
May 6, 5:35:53–5:36:17 — Directly insulted Cletus’s intelligence and accused him of inventing false claims.
May 6, 5:57:42–5:58:58 — Compared Cletus to Kyle and called his behavior unhinged and delusional.
May 7, 5:40–6:04 — Publicized an allegation about comments supposedly made by Clue in Discord and ridiculed them.
May 7, 6:09–7:12 — Announced that anyone who gave these critics a voice—or failed to shut them down—should not pretend to be friendly with her. Nothing says “I welcome facts” like demanding social quarantine.
May 8, 1:51:56–1:52:25 — Accused Truth, Clue, and Cletus of holding a livestream where information was dangled as fact.
May 8, 4:37:24–4:38:04 — Used personal, appearance-based, screaming, and sexualized insults against Cletus and Truth.
May 9, 5:43–8:58 — Polled her audience about Cletus, repeatedly described his stream as “vile,” and declined to play the full material while controlling the audience’s description of it. The evidence was apparently too vile to hear but perfectly safe to summarize for everyone. She knew it would PROVE HER A LIAR.
May 9, 10:34–12:26 — Built an extended hypothetical involving Clue, Cletus, Truth, fear, police, and protection orders.
May 9, 1:21:39–1:22:15 — Imagined forcing Cletus to travel to Arizona for a protection-order proceeding despite him having no connection to Arizona.
May 9, 1:34:30–1:34:50 — Asked Clue to imagine Nonsense seeking a DVPO against Cletus.
May 9, 1:44:58–1:45:22 — Said she could file reports on Truth and Cletus as part of the same hypothetical.
May 10, 4:21–5:47 — Claimed Clue and Cletus’s side directly and “vilely” threatened her, again without playing the full source clip in that segment because she knew it wasn't a threat and would again PROVE HER A LIAR.
May 10, 13:36–15:40 — Said Clue and Cletus dragged themselves into the conflict and threatened her, then used Cletus’s language to reject alternative interpretations.
May 10, 29:48–30:20 — Claimed Clue’s threats formed part of a documented escalation.
May 11, 7:16–7:56 and 17:16–18:07 — Repeated sexualized alleged-threat language involving Cletus and mocked the explanation that the remark meant exposure rather than physical harm.
May 11, 10:16–11:13 — Refused to provide timestamps while describing Clue and Cletus’s streams as screaming, hollering, unhinged, and vile. Apparently timestamps became optional precisely when they would let people check the story themselves.
May 11, 27:00–27:40 — Called Truth a loser and a dweeb and said she had never liked him.
May 13, 20:23–21:15 — Characterized a statement attributed to Clue as a sexual-assault threat.
May 13, 2:30:53–2:31:13 — Escalated that claim further by saying Clue’s words would qualify as sexual assault.
May 13, 3:01:46–3:03:44 — Alleged doxxing attempts involving Truth’s moderators, Clue, and Cletus and claimed incorrect identifying information had been dangled during a livestream.
May 14, 32:42–34:54 — Repeated the claim that Truth, Clue, Cletus, and their moderators dangled information about someone and knew what was happening.
May 14, 1:14:13–1:14:40 and 2:09:21–2:10:20 — Repeatedly framed Clue’s alleged statement as a sexual-assault or rape threat and morally condemned anyone who remained friendly with her.
May 15, 5:09:36–5:10:16 — Said Truth and his moderators stirred the situation, Clue directed her toward doxxing material, and Truth “chased his tail.”
May 15, 5:47:28–5:53:04 — Expanded the allegations into a doxxing and misinformation pipeline involving Kramit, Truth, Clue, and Cletus.
May 16, 21:24–21:50 — Stacked allegations of doxxing, misinformation, Discord coordination, and encouragement around Truth and associated creators.
May 16, 1:04:00–1:04:40 — Claimed Truth threatened to “go real life” on her and her child - Again NEVER HAPPENED.
May 19, 20:30–21:34 and 40:00–41:09 — Said Clue was manipulated by misinformation, reacted without fact-checking, discussed Nonsense’s home life, deleted streams, and lied. ALL LIES it was nonsense either believing lies or completely fabricating these attacks on her.
All Clue did was try to calm angry subscribers by saying "maybe she has something going on at home" and Nonsense has attached the worst possible intentions and motives and twisted what was actually said atleast a couple dozen different ways including saying Clue was talking about and going after her family.
May 19, 3:04:00–3:06:13 — Called Truth and his moderators intrusive, publicly humiliated them, and assigned blame for spreading non existent conflict.
May 20, 7:32–8:18 — Called Truth a dangerous liar who deserved to be “named and shamed.”
May 20, 1:07:30–1:15:00 — Accused Truth of falsely claiming she committed sexual assault and supported self-harm or attacks against hospitalized people.
That is just May.
JUNE: BECAUSE “NEVER” APPARENTLY NEEDED A SEQUEL
June 9, throughout the stream — Claimed detachment while continuing to search for, name, mock, and assign motives to Truth, Clue, Granny, and others. Extremely detached. Practically invisible.
June 10, 1:16:11–1:16:37 — Speculated that Granny and Clue withheld information because it involved Brittney, the prosecutor, and private material.
June 10, 1:19:12–1:20:40 — Said Clue and others pushed a witness-intimidation accusation.
June 10, 1:46:43–1:47:06 — Called Truth degrading names and accused him of fabricating stories to manufacture victimhood.
June 11, 46:40–52:15 — Folded Clue’s Discord and other creators into a broad legal and dishonesty narrative.
June 12, 39:37–39:57 — Repeated a reputation-sensitive allegation attributed to Clue concerning Nonsense’s employment and financial motives.
June 12, 51:29–53:05 — Called Truth and other critics serial liars who continually moved the goalposts. REAL RICH COMING FROM NONSENSE I KNOW.
June 13, 10:33–11:45 — Claimed Clue used Granny’s panel to spread lies and bait Nonsense into responding.
June 13, 15:05–20:43 — Announced that “nobody” was talking about Clue while describing Clue as a real-lifer who crossed family boundaries. Schr��dinger’s target: simultaneously not being discussed and receiving a dedicated segment.
June 13, 1:04:00–1:12:30 — Claimed Truth spoke in riddles and Clue “poured gasoline” on them, connecting both to a wider creator-and-court conspiracy narrative.
June 13, 3:33:00–3:38:30 — Accused Truth of weaponizing extreme allegations to create victimhood and repeatedly lying.
June 18, 2:34:32–2:38:45 — Accused Truth of lying about predator and “chomo” labels and pulled Clue and Cletus back into the argument.
June 18, 3:31:58–3:32:44 — Treated another statement from Truth as a threat involving family.
June 18, 4:21:04–4:22:02 — Used neurodivergence as part of a credibility attack while revisiting predator and self-harm allegations.
June 20, 56:23–57:40 — Said supporting Clue and Truth should itself raise concerns, accused Truth of serious lies involving self-harm and sexual assault, and accused Clue of targeting families and children.
June 20, 58:04–1:00:27 — Agreed with chat that Granny had “chosen” Clue and Truth and accused Truth of encouraging reports based on lies.
June 23, 41:12–42:25 — Accused Clue of targeting moderators, normalized bigotry on panels about Nonsense, and referenced misuse of the court system.
June 24, 14:14–17:45 — Branded Truth “Elevated Delusions” and “Elevated Cult,” accused him of fabricating stories, and portrayed him as manufacturing victimhood.
June 24, 45:13–51:24 — Accused Truth of weaponizing trauma, fabricating a sexual-assault story, calling her a predator, encouraging reports, and threatening legal action.
June 24, 1:28:08–1:33:51 — Recycled disputes involving labels such as suicide troll, pedophile, “chomo,” predator, and sexual assault.
June 24, 1:35:04–1:40:35 — Expanded the content into Truth’s spouse, police calls, FOIA material, and other real-life issues.
June 24, 1:42:49–1:50:54 — Said Clue lost her channel because of Terms of Service violations and alleged that Clue encouraged reporting other people which is a lie they never talked about reporting anyone till after Clues channel was already gone.
June 25, 24:01–24:26 — A panel segment listed Truth’s ADHD, erectile dysfunction, blood pressure, autoimmune condition, infertility, mania, suicidal ideation, trauma, and substance-use issues. Because nothing says ethical accountability like converting someone’s medical and mental-health history into a content buffet.
June 25, 1:13:29–1:14:06 — Called Clue vile, alleged she said Truth’s sexual assault never happened, and condemned people who remained friendly with her.
June 25, 1:37:18–1:37:47 — She says Truth’s friends claimed that he said Katie was “hitting on” him and contrasts that alleged statement with his professed respect for Sebastian.
June 25, 2:40:24–2:40:58 — Minimized Truth’s doxxing concern by saying he doxxed himself and ridiculing the complaint.
June 25, 6:12:34–6:14:43 — Used an allegation involving a grieving mother to attack Clue’s credibility.
So no, this was not Nonsense innocently minding her business until Cletus spontaneously “went off the rails.” Clue and Cletus only gave her a handful of responses in them months and they certainly didn't dedicate 8-12 hour streams to her.
It was weeks of livestreams portraying Clue, Cletus, and Truth as liars, threats, manipulators, real-lifers, doxxers, misinformation operators, family-targeters, sexual-assault fabricators, report organizers, and participants in coordinated attacks.
She did not merely answer criticism. She built a continuing narrative, widened it whenever necessary, and repeatedly attached the most damaging possible interpretation to the people who were her friends no matter how many hours she spends trying to downplay her friendship with them - had stopped aligning with her.
Then came the revision:
“I never went after Clue, Cletus, or Truth.”
Of course not.
She simply insulted them, speculated about their motives, accused them of severe misconduct, revisited their private lives, implicated their friends and moderators, repeated the allegations across many streams, and encouraged her audience to view association with them as suspicious.
Totally different.
And now Cletus is supposedly a “banned creator” who “went off the rails” on her? Prove it. Show the conduct, provide the timestamps, and explain what “banned” is supposed to mean.
Until then, it looks like another unsupported label added to a very crowded pile-because when alliances change, Nonsense’s “facts” have a remarkable habit of changing with them.
I can barely tolerate her in clips. NS will play a live, stop it, and pick out something the person said. THEN instead of discussing exactly what they said she adds her "storyline"/lie about what they were thinking, doing and planning. If all of these people were plotting and planning something how does she claim to know what people are thinking? I was proofreading my what I typed and thought "Miss Blue, that doesn't make any sense". But I know who I'm talking about. This woman Nonsense who does not speak facts or truth but creates scenarios about damn good people. The only person who's interested in Nonsense is Nonsense.
Nonsense is still obsessed with getting revenge on every creator who refused to fall in line with her performative outrage against Julie. In her warped little hero fantasy, Julie stole the spotlight that apparently belonged to her-and she has been punishing former friends and allies ever since.
The only thing Nonsense consistently stands for is destroying her current target while lining up the next one. She pretends her campaign against Julie was about opposing lawfare, yet Julie had no case against them and was dealing with a petty misdemeanor. Nonsense still targeted her daily for months.
Now she rewrites the history of every relationship, revives old grievances and attaches whatever conspiracy she can manufacture to a missing child’s case-all to incite a new audience against the people who stopped obeying her.
Meanwhile, it’s always everyone else “lying” and “pushing false narratives.” She claims these creators have been coming after her for months, but does she honestly think nobody can see what is happening? She is lucky to get one or two responses a week from them. They may occasionally correct one of her lies, but they certainly aren’t dedicating eight hours a day, seven days a week to her the way she and her friends obsessively target them.
Nobody needs to destroy Nonsense’s credibility. She is handling that all by herself-one lie, one rewritten history, one false narrative and one weaponized private message at a time.
Listen to her own words. This isn’t advocacy; it’s not a search for the truth, it’s retaliation dressed up as a crusade, with Sebastian’s case repeatedly dragged into her creator conspiracies for attention, outrage and revenge.
@KT87985373 She keeps using "context" as her excuse but what she means is "I need to lie while explaining away this horrible statement." Just like Allegedly Speculating's emails. That's not context it's a whole LIE.
heres a post with links for nonsense circumventing - shes gonna target whoever posts it though @YouTube@TeamYouTube@GoogleAdSense, can you clarify whether this is prohibited circumvention?
Nonsense’s first September 1 livestream was struck and removed while she was broadcasting:
🔗 First stream:
https://t.co/EbvEeXgANL
She immediately continued streaming from her second channel:
🔗 Second stream:
https://t.co/N1SAzXxfzG
▪️ **2:08** — She says the claimant “just struck my main account.”
https://t.co/rcJSyikQ9t
▪️ **2:31** — She identifies the claimant and announces that YouTube displayed the person’s legal name.
https://t.co/fvozzcfmIs
▪️ **3:05** — She says she will upload the removed material again.
https://t.co/Gyanz41xPK
▪️ **3:40** — She confirms that the livestream was removed from YouTube “in real time.”
https://t.co/rNKc47Kq7d
▪️ **6:12** — She acknowledges that she is broadcasting from her other channel.
https://t.co/wEZIl7u5M6
▪️ **7:24** — She again discusses the claimant’s full legal name appearing on-screen.
https://t.co/cfWrBNzBtO
▪️ **3:24:09** — She says viewers will continue seeing her on the second channel until the problem with the first one is fixed.
https://t.co/0nEm4czNRL
YouTube says an active livestream removed for copyright results in a seven-day livestreaming restriction. Its policy also says using another channel to livestream while that restriction is active is prohibited circumvention and may result in account termination:
https://t.co/g6852chTnD
https://t.co/Xg1IwVEDxu
If her livestreaming restriction was active, how was immediately jumping to another channel and continuing the broadcast not circumvention?
@ShayBe55 I'm a mama bear and I'll be anyone's mama bear. I also don't need a group to back my ass, just lil ole me. IYKYK There's some ratchet women out there 🫵🫵🫵🫵🫵
@ShayBe55 My favorite sentence was "I didn't recognize any of the Secret Service!!!!!!!"
@ShayBe55 I googled who is the least happiest female in the world and the answer was LIBERAL WOMEN are the angriest and loneliest! Nothing but projection baby!
@ShayBe55 😏 Awww poor BHB isn't in the click. Remember on her drive there she said how proud she was being able to be in DC taking part of the unprecedented 250th Anniversary of our country? Yeah, how proud are you now....Flop At Life
@ShayBe55@aikenstandard This giant cow bought and changed her black tank top to a striped tank top to look more professional 👌 I just know, in my opinion, that she was born on a highway because that’s where most accidents happen 😉