I AM NOT, AND WILL NEVER BE, AMONG THOSE LOOKING FOR A PRETEXT FOR WAR BETWEEN NATO AND RUSSIA
I respect that Czech President Petr Pavel, as a former NATO general, would like to fight. I would therefore appreciate it if he respected the fact that I prefer peace.
Czech President Petr Pavel, whom I have always treated with respect and due regard as the head of the sovereign Czech Republic, often tends to comment on my work. This time, he took issue with my position on attempts to provoke a military conflict between NATO and Russia.
I understand that, as a former NATO general, he would like to fight. I expect him to respect my commitment to pursuing peace. Let me therefore repeat once again, so that there can be no doubt:
1️⃣ The West’s military rhetoric and the search for a pretext for a military conflict with Russia are intended to distract from the liberal world’s inability to address basic challenges such as the price and availability of energy and fuel, as well as illegal migration.
2️⃣ As long as I am Prime Minister of the Slovak Republic, I will not agree to Slovak soldiers taking part in any military adventure provoked by anyone within NATO.
3️⃣ In the event of an actual armed attack against one or more NATO member states, the relevant Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty provides NATO members with several options for demonstrating solidarity.
The European Union (EU) was founded on promises of peace, freedom, prosperity and strategic autonomy. What does it stand for today? War, censorship, authoritarianism, economic stagnation, if not outright deindustrialisation!
@beegarc_ E está a gastar mais em produzir os drones (parece que foram cerca de 2000) do que a Rússia sustenta em estragos reais provocados pelos drones.
Ou seja, é uma campanha autodestrutiva. 🤷♀️
5 criaturas da Somália, um dos países ao fundo da tabela no índice de desenvolvimento humano (HDI), ocupam lugares no parlamento de um dos países com maior HDI no mundo.
Um absurdo só possível graças à entrada de centenas de milhares de parasitas fiscalmente ruinosos da Somália.
This week, the European Parliament passed a resolution on ‘hybrid warfare’. 470 MEPs voted in favour of it.
This resolution holds that the EU is under attack from ‘sophisticated cognitive-psychological methods’ which include ‘reflexive control, a technique rooted in Soviet military theory that introduces specific informational inputs to limit a target’s perceived choices and steer decisions toward the influencer’s strategic goals’. It holds that ‘there has been a drastic increase in cognitive warfare’ on the citizens of the EU, and that ‘the success of modern military operations and the effectiveness of public institutions increasingly depend on the control of cyberspace and on the strategic use of digital resources and information systems.’
It goes on to say defence spending in regard to ‘internal security’ is ‘equally required’; that the EU is in a state of ‘phase zero’ warfare; and that ‘existing EU foreign and security policy frameworks, calibrated for consensus-based deliberation, generate structural latency that adversaries actively exploit; whereas this in-between state demands a fundamental reassessment of EU decision-making architecture in the security and defence domain.’
It all sounds a bit insane, doesn’t it. Deeply paranoid. Dangerously paranoid.
The list of MEPs who voted in favour of this resolution is reproduced below. I’d encourage citizens to contact them to ask why they think citizens’ current discontent is rooted in ‘cognitive warfare’ rather than the manifest decline in most people’s living standards across the EU over the past number of years.
You could also ask to what degree they intend to ‘control’ and ‘strategically use’ the internet, and indeed what they envisage defence spending for ‘internal security’ will consist of - given internal security is in most EU states usually a matter for the police, and is financed through the budgets of interior ministries or departments of justice.
And why, you could ask, do they think that the power to decide by consensus on matters of war and peace should be taken away from EU governments, and who, then, do they think should be empowered to decide for all of them - and for all of us?
For Irish voters, you could ask your MEPs - highlighted below - why they’re voting in favour of the extensive cooperation between and integration of EU Member States and NATO envisaged in the resolution, since neutral Ireland is not a member of the NATO military alliance, and its public has no desire to be.
This morning saw the largest drone attack on Moscow since the start of the war. Russia had anticipated a major attack aimed at disrupting its elections, yet several drones penetrated its air-defence systems. No serious analysts believe that such large scale attacks that aim to circumvent Russia's air defences are done without NATO participation. After surviving the Cold War, today’s political class seems determined to risk triggering a nuclear war.
@itstottialves Sim, é uma estimativa e este é o melhor, mas dá para analizar 1 perfil, depois é a pagar.
Um amigo em investigação criminal usava isto para analisar perfis engajados em esquemas fraudulentos/crypto no X.