Mistine Weisenburger

[Mistine Weisenburger @MistineWeisenb1]

This student won the ruling and now will not endure emotional hardship and bullying that developed from discrimination. He will use the boys' restroom keeping his civil rights protected.

[Mistine Weisenburger @MistineWeisenb1]

https://t.co/z2ojx8xJ6U #StudentClassification,Segregation&Resegregation,AffirmativeActioninAdmissions #UrbanSchoolLaw @IUPUIEdLawProf @IUPUISchoolOfEd

[Mistine Weisenburger @MistineWeisenb1]

This student's Title XI claim based on Whitaker v Kenosha Unified Sch. The school says the student must use the restroom that his birth certificate states he should use. The student argument is for Equal Protection.

[Mistine Weisenburger @MistineWeisenb1]

The change in placement made by the parents was not necessary for the child's best interest.

[Mistine Weisenburger @MistineWeisenb1]

https://t.co/BTLiCdOk4x #StudentsWithDisabilities #UrbanSchoolLaw @IUPUIEdLawProf @IUPUISchoolOfEd

[Mistine Weisenburger @MistineWeisenb1]

The school is meeting the child's needs according to Rowley. The parents will not get paid for legal fees or the fees to attend the outside learning center. This student was making gains with the IEP that was in place with half day placement.

[Mistine Weisenburger @MistineWeisenb1]

This is a common practice for religious education. This was an interesting ruling on a practice that occurs routinely in county schools.

[Mistine Weisenburger @MistineWeisenb1]

https://t.co/1SyEIHmuBy
@IUPUIEdLawProf @IUPUISchoolOfEd #UrbanSchoolLaw #IntructionalIssuesStudentRecords/FERPA

[Mistine Weisenburger @MistineWeisenb1]

This religious education fails the Lemon's "effects test" because the district allowed the instruction during the school day on school grounds giving a "message of endorsement and disapproval." The Establishment Clause had therefore been violated.

[Mistine Weisenburger @MistineWeisenb1]

The courts cited Anderson v. Brand as precedence to support this ruling. The layoff provisions of SB 1 was not reasonable to serve public purpose. This teacher did not have poor evaluations to support the release of his position as well.

[Mistine Weisenburger @MistineWeisenb1]

https://t.co/xbSV7NsJgn
#LaborRelatins&EmploymentConditions #UrbanSchoolLaw @IUPUIEdLawProf @IUPUISchoolofEd

[Mistine Weisenburger @MistineWeisenb1]

During the 2012-2013 school year a qualified veteran teacher was terminated and qualified non-tenured teachers were retained. This teachers constitutional contract was violated because he was tenured before the law took effect. This impairment awarded this teacher back pay.

[Mistine Weisenburger @MistineWeisenb1]

If more homeschool sites refuse vouchers there will be more monies for public school settings.

[Mistine Weisenburger @MistineWeisenb1]

https://t.co/w4bB4tqbFK
Tina Hollenbeck, a homeschooling parent in Wisconsin, tells Breitbart News she is “deeply opposed to vouchers for anyone, especially homeschoolers.”@IUPUIEdLawProf@IUPUISchoolofEd #UrbanSchoolLaw#LegalIssuesinEducationalChoice

[Mistine Weisenburger @MistineWeisenb1]

Vouchers prohibit teaching about faith, but also would require accountability to state academic standards. This is not a separation of church and state issue it is about holding these teachers in homeschools to high academic levels.