I’ve received more and more DMs recently from people saying they are facing a situation similar to what happened to me a while ago.
I was once banned from Hyperliquid after an AML provider apparently flagged my address by mistake.
I was eventually unbanned after the post got attention.
To be clear: I don’t know what every person messaging me did. Some flags may be justified, some may not.
But this can happen to anyone.
The recent situation with @0xasrequired is another reminder that even serious, active and well-known users can suddenly face issues without fully understanding why.
That’s why I think users deserve more transparency.
Hyperliquid remains one of the best projects of this cycle, and one of the strongest DeFi products in years.
But the AML process feels too opaque from the user side.
There should be a clearer way to understand a restriction, appeal it, and resolve false positives.
Strict compliance is fine.
Opaque bans are not.
Hyperliquid
I just got banned from @HyperliquidX ?? 😭😭
My main wallet was suddenly flagged as “high risk” by a third-party screening tool, and I can no longer connect to the Hyperliquid frontend
I genuinely do not understand this decision, especially because it is happening now.
Over the past two months, I had actually been much less active than usual because I was busy with other things and had taken a partial break from trading.
I have been trading on Hyperliquid organically for months, usually once or twice a week, and I have been a real supporter of the ecosystem from early on. I am not posting this to attack Hyperliquid, because I still believe the team has built something exceptional.
What I do find concerning is how cases like this are handled. I reached out on Discord to understand what happened, and instead of being able to explain myself or get any clarity, I was timed out for a week.
I honestly do not believe I did anything wrong. This wallet has been mine for more than 4 to 5 years, and I have never been flagged or reported for suspicious activity on any airdrop or any platform I have ever used.
This was also my main address on Hyperliquid, the one where I did most of my activity, with around $750,000 in total volume since the beginning. I know that may be negligible compared with some bigger traders, but it was still my primary account and an important part of my activity on the platform.
I will keep trading on Hyperliquid using secondary addresses, because I still support the product, but the lack of transparency and the inability to defend yourself when flagged is genuinely harmful for users.
All I am asking for is clarity, a fair review process, and the ability to understand what supposedly triggered this.
If anyone can help me, or share any useful information that could help me resolve this situation, I would be immensely grateful !
@Sahcmoilevrai@0xasrequired Yeah that’s why a global answer should be given not necessarily by Hyperliquid but especially by AML who often relies on Ai and automatic system
Quick recap.
Hypurr World Cup Edition 🏆:
> 528 NFTs.
> 48 nations.
> 11 NFTs per team.
> 0.26 hyperliquid:native mint.
> Built on HyperEVM.
> Predictions are open to everyone.
> Team NFT Leaderboard is for holders.
> 20+ hyperliquid:native in minimum rewards.
Mint opens June 7 at 20:00 CEST