🌿pDAI is mint-able...
The Mysterious L2
—🔑—
• PP = pDAI Protocol, Peg restoration system
• L1 = PulseChain Mainnet
• L2 = pARB, Gated, forked Optimistic Arbitrum rollup
• pDAI (1) = pDAI on L1, Fixed Supply
• pDAI (2) = pDAI on L2, Mint-able
• aDAI (1) = Bridged aDAI on L1 (receipt/claim token)
• aDAI (2) = aDAI on L2 from pAAVE
——
pDAI being mintable on L2 is one of the most important revelations to come out of the new PP architecture...
❌️ pDAI (1) cannot be minted
✅️ pDAI (2) can be minted
This fundamentally changes how the PP works and how price discovery happens between the two layers.
——
❔️Why minting on L2 matters
With pDAI (2) being minted, new supply can enter the ecosystem through L2, allowing leveraged growth (via pAAVE) on L2, while pDAI (1) supply remains fixed.
The PP design ensures that value bridged to L1 creates buy pressure on the fixed pDAI (1) supply, rather than adding more supply to pDAI (1).
💠 New supply enters via L2, while pDAI (1) stays deflationary, as pDAI (1) supply can only be reduced
This is intentional.
The architecture deliberately moves minting and leveraged usage to L2, while protecting the core pDAI supply on L1.
——
🏝Independence DAI
The price of pDAI (2) and pDAI (1) can move independently of each other, because pDAI (2) is created on L2 its market price is driven by L2 supply and demand, separate from L1.
💠 What this means is pDAI (2) can trade at a different price than pDAI (1).
When pDAI (2) trades at a premium to pDAI (1), arbitrageurs can*:
1️⃣ Sell pDAI (2) on L2
2️⃣ Bridge proceeds/value to L1
3️⃣ Market Buy pDAI (1)
4️⃣ Optionally rotate back into L2 to repeat the process
(*Basic version, reality will look alot more leverage-y, but this works for an example)
Although, this is not the main driver of buy pressure on pDAI (1). The main driver comes from using aDAI (1) for L1 liquidity pool seeding.
——
🌰Seeding L1 pools = Buy pressure on native pDAI (1)
When aDAI (2) is bridged to L1 via the pARB Gateway, it mints a corresponding aDAI (1) (claim/reciept token) on PulseChain L1.
(Underlying pDAI (2) that was supplied to pAAVE remains in the L2 lending market.)
This aDAI (1) is then used to seed liquidity pools on L1 (pDAI/aDAI pairs).
To seed these pools, actual pDAI (1) must be bought to pair with aDAI (1), and because pDAI (1) supply is fixed/deflationary, this increased buying activity creates buy real pressure on pDAI (1).
And the more value bridged from L2 to L1, the stronger the buy pressure becomes.
——
⚙️The flywheel effect
TL;DR
1️⃣ L2 pAAVE minting and leveraged looping
2️⃣ Bridge value/proceeds to L1
3️⃣ L1 liquidity seeding
4️⃣ Buy pressure on fixed pDAI (1).
Over time, this mechanism aligns L2 and L1 prices through market forces even though pDAI (2) can be minted independently.
Have faith in the 1000IQ architects designing this – their focus is stability, security and longevity, because...
Once pDAI is $1
pDAI stays $1.
Waaah waaaah the prices suck waaah. Bitches. I've been here since 2011. That's 15 fucking years. The prices have sucked again and again, it's in the game. Man up.
Ethereum, let me explain a bit how stupid you are. Instead of supporting me, who is rumored to hold lots and lots of ETH, you supported this piece of shit. You're sorry.