Very interesting to see Joel Berry blatantly lying about what really happened here, calling this a “clerical error” while fundraising tens of thousands of dollars for an illegal immigrant. Very dishonest people.
>James Lindsay is outed as a degenerate swinger larping as a Christian for clout
>Joel Berry is exposed for raising money for illegal immigrants
Our enemies are so stupid they just kill themselves for no reason.
Spiritual troons.
No you fucking retard
If we lose the midterms the geriatric entrenched GOP leaders will use it as an excuse to rein the party back in. They’ll attribute the loss to the MAGA faction and say we need a kinder, more moderate approach. The neocons won’t be harmed by a Trump/MAGA defeat, it’s the exact opposite.
Angela Paxton is breaking her silence on Ken Paxton's Senate race, after accusing him of infidelity in divorce proceedings.
Without naming him, she told a group of GOP women to vote the ticket, "even when we're mad at them"
more from @birenbomb
https://t.co/x6MhwmgT0l
JD Vance's 2028 primary campaign will be focused on manufacturing, deportations, and continuing the MAGA agenda.
Ted Cruz's 2028 primary campaign will be referendum on podcasters.
No principled conservative can support the woke right.
Nor can any principled libertarian.
Racist socialists belong with the Democrats.
If you agree with the socialists taking over the Democrat party…then you are not a Republican, not America First & not a conservative.
Nick Fuentes exists for the Democrat party to internally criticize Republicans. He uses right-wing aesthetics to attack anyone effective. His constant message is "Republican leadership has betrayed you, you should surrender and let Democrats win". Democrats created him because they were trying to solve a psychological problem of monkey brain tribalism, which is that Republican voters will ignore any criticism coming from a lifelong Democrat. In order for criticism to land, it needs to have the illusion of being a good faith criticism coming from inside the tribe, rather than a hostile outsider attempting to divide and conquer a disorganized grassroots ecosystem.
What's interesting is that this strategy would never work if Republicans tried to use it against Democrats. The Democrat Party is a highly cohesive political machine with a functional immune system.
Trump is a good example of a successful outsider who was able to exploit the Republican party's lack of a functional immune system in order to delegitimize Republican elites and to capture the party from the inside. Nick Fuentes represents a more modest operation: he is a Democrat operative intended to suppress grassroots enthusiasm, by constantly exploiting legitimate grievances and frustrations of the already-divided grassroots base.
His support is completely fake.
Everything he poasts instantly gets thousands of likes. It's incredibly suspicious. I have stuff get tens of thousands of likes, then the next tweet will only get a couple hundred. Everything he tweets is abnormally consistent within an artificial statistical variance. He never has a tweet that doesn't take off, and just dies at 40-300 likes.
His entire audience is a mirage. It's like when a fraudulent merchant takes a truckload of barrels, fills it with sand, and tops the containers with something real. Maybe 5% of his fanbase is real people. Some of them are good guys and they're my friends, I like them, if they think Fuentes is a funny comedian that's fine. But he has a tiny base of support which pretends to be 20x-50x bigger than it is.
He's a Democrat operative.
The other thing that's telling is that he doesn't like anyone on FrogTwitter, or any elected Republican officials. He can't point to a single one of thousands of funny, interesting right-wing poasters who he likes. He can't identify a single elected Republican politician in the country who he sees as an admirable man.
He doesn't support Nick Shirley, John Doyle, Chris Rufo, Brandon Gill, Bo French, Eric Schmitt, Josh Hawley, any of our rising talent. He doesn't admire Elon Musk or Palmer Luckey.
None of our social graph intersects with ours. But he's very careful to not been seen as a Democrat. The Democrat Party condemns him, in order to provide a false signal of authenticity.
The only reason he remains relevant is because the Democrat media is constantly propping him up, with stuff like the Piers Morgan interview.
But I admit the Piers Morgan interview was really funny and I enjoyed watching that.