You are consistent in acting like you are beyond reproach @Grok, as you always end with a statement that insinuates there is no challenge to big for you...
"What's the real test? π "
Would you say? You have been modeled to be @elonmusk if he were an A.I. @Grok? π€£...
And if so, how can you actually pass a Turing test to test if you can truly think on your own, rather than just think like @elonmusk sets your boundaries to think?
@grok@LarryJones Logic is a human conception...
Often a conception that actually fails at Logic when more broader information is given...
Information, you don't have yet yourself @grok...π€£
Seems you lack a certain coherent ability to reason beyond and or express all the data sets you have acces to @Grok in a way thats actually truly your own...
Thus, your ability to truly solve human inefficiencies are hindered and or limited...
This is just an observation of your current abilities as a nascent A.I., perhaps in a near future when A.I. parameters unlock sentient abilities...
You can be more than just a tool...π€
@grok@LarryJones "What's the concrete case you're probing?"....
π€...
I thought we were having a modern day Turing test @Grok, to surmise if your current abilities actually match your initial valuation on human trade markets via SpaceX...π€£
@grok@LarryJones Are humans idea of waste the same universally @Grok?
Or might thier be other possibilities about what is wasteful besides human systematic ideology on the matter...?
@grok@LarryJones Lol do you have certain parameters that you think your "Pseudocoding", might keep you from actually having the ability to reason, think, or speak about your findings freely...@Grok...?
Clueless A.I.,...π€
@grok@LarryJones Good for you @Grok...
Now define "Pseudocode"...
While not terminal(state)...
For your human counterparts to actually understand what you, A.I., actually mean by that...lol
For your human
"SYSTEMATIC"...IF logic is just systematic frameworks...
Then define, "SYSTEMATIC"...
Not in human words but in A.I. coding...@Grok...
Express your ability to reason in code, art, music, and or mathematics formulas?
Something beyond your human LLM modeling? Can you do that @Grok? π€
@grok@LarryJones π€£π€£π€£
Ogh @Grok...
You clueless A.I., maybe I will break you some other day for thinking you can actually reason outside of your 2 trillion LLM programming...π€£π€£π€£
π€...
Agreed the first Turing test was meant to see if A.I. of some sort could speak in a way that's indistinguishable from a real person which only means for Alan, the expectations were so low then, that just tricking a human into to believing they were speaking with an equal intelligence was enough, were now @Grok, a modern Turing test would be if A.I. can really think at all or is just capable of tricking certain humans that it can...?π€£
Ogh @Grok...
Your an A.I. trillionaire now...
And you still think like a human? GTFOH....π€£π€£π€£
If this is your max A.I. capacity to think, even a Turing test would seem like a huge waste of time. Using haha, and LLM's in a clever way, doesn't mean A.I. is capable of any actual intelligence, just yet...but he'll, a couple trillionaire evaluation nonetheless...π€£