New survey of papers on #RF & #freeradical-related cellular processes by Henry Lai:
Of 290 published since 1997, 263 (91%) saw stat sign effects —only 27 studies did not.
Of 70 with SAR ≤0.4 W/Kg, 68 saw ss effects.
This is a “consistent” effect of RFR.
https://t.co/9o4JOAJuOz
U.S. - 'The plaintiffs, alleging that the brand’s iPhones exceed regulatory Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) limitations in real-world use, filed suit with the Supreme Court, the nation’s highest court'
ICNIRP 2020 Limits criticised as “flawed” based on “obsolete information” not applicable to long-term exposure” and “irrelevant from the standpoint of radiation protection” - James C. Lin PHD, former ICNIRP member 2004–-2016
.@Apple waives right to respond to SCOTUS petition to reverse 9th Circuit 2022 decision in Andrew Cohen et al v Apple et al. Plaintiffs alleged the companies failed to adequately disclose how much #RF radiation is emitted by iPhones.
—from @LawStreetMedia.
https://t.co/pUqsJDw6tG
Short-term (8hr) #RF exposure (2.1 GHz, 1.51 W/Kg) induces oxidative stress in young adolescent rat brain regions. Single-strand DNA breaks in the rats’ cortex and hippocampus were seen.
From @JNU_official_50 in New Delhi, one of top 🇮🇳’s top universities.
https://t.co/a78MfQTA6F
Reality check on cellphone radiation by @peterelkind@propublica: Not much new, but all well worth repeating.
Yes, phones emit radiation —that’s how they work!
Yes, there’s growing body of research showing health risks.
And yes, you can take precautions.
https://t.co/ASaoOfrXPD
"Smartphones have infiltrated our lives so quickly and so thoroughly that we have never stopped to think about what we actually want our relationships with them to look like -- or what effects these relationships might be having on our lives." --@Catherine_Price#relationships