@IM_CTF A4: I have really enjoyed taking time to reflect about idea management and it's processess in general. There is still so much to try and so much to learn! #im74
@IM_CTF A3: The more the merrier! :) I think that multiple and diverse perspectives are valuable when it comes to idea assessment. Both experts and users can contribute with insights. #im74
@IM_CTF A2: I think you have to look at both the long term objectives when it comes to why you are working with ideas/innovation (vision). But also correlate – but not limit them to – the current situation (feasibility, resources, etc). #im74
@IM_CTF A1: In my experience both intuitive- and rational decision making can be useful, it depends on the situation/context. The two methods have different strengths/weaknesses, for example quick/more time consuming and when the decision is complex/more linear. #im74
@IM_CTF#im74 A3: I think that social networks is really important. They can add perspectives, experience and important insight. But you also risk "loosing" your idea.
@IM_CTF A1: (Cathing up on the tweetchat). In my experience you need a defined problem, a (somewhat) defined idea and co-creation. The outcome should be an idea that is feasible, tangible and assessable. #im74
@IM_CTF A3: I think that one of the most important things that can be done is acknowledging the individuals intrinsic motivation, and using that to find ways to keep challenging them in a way that is in correlation with the motivation. #im74
@IM_CTF A2: I think that a mix of people adds creativity and insight to the process. But it may slow things down – since many perspectives are involved – and in some cases that may be a negative thing. #im74
@IM_CTF Q1: Based on my experiences the pros of a wider scope is that the process might be more creative (since there are many solutions), but it is also much harder to grasp. #im74
@Sukhov88@IM_CTF#im74 😊 The impossible question. The ideas that seems to best solve the problem at hand. A bunch of criteria is often considered, but they too vary.