MoonwalkDelta27

Small Inactive Youtuber. Relatively active on socials
Bilingual (I speak Spanish and English)
Modded MC and DDLC my beloved (I'm also into other games xd)

xd

[MoonwalkDelta27 @MoonwalkDelta27]

@heartss4mj Only bad track was Keep Your Head Up fr even the fake songs were good

[TEMZY ✞ @imtemzy]

You can tell this is fiction because the IDF soldier actually feels bad about the child dying

[pep 🐟 @SUBMARINER1941]

there’s just something so special about 70s comics that tried to tackle race relations

[ejm @erav4lgaris]

@SUBMARINER1941 hulk vs. sabra genuinely makes me well up a bit

[MoonwalkDelta27 @MoonwalkDelta27]

@Cafe_shadowxp24 @emisolate

[MoonwalkDelta27 @MoonwalkDelta27]

@JohnMartinPugh @JeffMoo62074 @Dani_WSDK @NotAgnor The Master confirmed that in the same movie though. Some plot points can be retconned

[MoonwalkDelta27 @MoonwalkDelta27]

@John_Blackie22 sé que es un meme, pero hot take: La bisexualidad debería ser la norma social.

[MJ Friends | Fan Account @mjfriends_]

Every time a Michael Jackson hater runs out of legal arguments regarding his 2005 acquittal, they rush to the internet and pull out the same sensationalist story: “The Neverland police reports and the disturbing books.” They act as if it's some newly discovered bombshell, but the truth is simple: all of this was debated, scrutinized, and ultimately rejected by the jury in court more than 20 years ago.

Let me explain once and for all what the FBI and the American justice system actually concluded about the books found in Michael's room.
Michael never even touched those books (zero fingerprints). Let's start with the fact that immediately destroys this narrative. Forensic investigators examined the books seized from Neverland and found that Michael Jackson's fingerprints were not present on the interior pages of any of them. Michael owned a massive library of more than 10,000 books. As he explained in interviews, he received thousands of gifts, packages, photography books, and publications from fans, photographers, and publishers around the world. Many of those items went straight onto shelves without him ever opening them or even knowing exactly what they contained. The prosecution tried to blame a man for books he may never have even flipped through.
They were 100% legal art books. The titles seized by investigators, including works associated with artists such as James Bidgood, Simen Johan, and Kelly Klein, were collections of photography, naturist imagery, and adult artistic content. They were legally published, available through mainstream retailers, and cataloged by major libraries. None of them met the legal definition of child pornography. If there had been even the slightest indication of illegal content, Michael would have been charged with possessing prohibited material back in either 1993 or 2003. That never happened.

Even the prosecutor admitted it. Ron Zonen, one of the prosecutors who worked tirelessly to secure a conviction in 2005, later acknowledged a key fact: “There was no child pornography. There were no videos involving children.” The prosecution attempted to use the books as part of a broader theory of grooming, hoping to create a particular impression in the minds of jurors. But speculation is not evidence, and the strategy ultimately failed.

In 2016, tabloids tried to revive the story. Websites such as Radar Online republished old allegations and claimed to reveal shocking new evidence. Critics pointed out serious issues with those reports, including allegations that certain images had been digitally altered or presented in a misleading way. Some observers also noted the inclusion of material from works published years after the original Neverland searches, raising questions about the accuracy and reliability of the reports. The controversy only reinforced how heavily disputed those claims were.
The FBI found nothing illegal. Federal authorities spent years examining allegations involving Michael Jackson. Investigators reviewed computers, hard drives, documents, and other materials seized from Neverland. After all of that scrutiny, no child pornography charges resulted from those investigations. Reports indicated that investigators found adult heterosexual pornography, which is completely legal for an adult to possess. Michael Jackson was an adult man, and possessing legal adult pornography is not a crime anywhere in the United States. The jury already saw all of this. During the 2005 trial, jurors reviewed the books, heard the testimony, examined the evidence, and listened to the prosecution's theories. They were not kept in the dark. They saw the very material that critics continue to cite today. After months of testimony and deliberation, the result was clear Michael Jackson was found not guilty on all 14 counts.
Bringing up these books today as if they are some newly discovered smoking gun does not demonstrate a deep understanding of the case.

[MoonwalkDelta27 @MoonwalkDelta27]

@noctadri @DiegoECV16 DC se llama así por Detective Comics, la línea en la que debutó Batman.

[MoonwalkDelta27 @MoonwalkDelta27]

@MirumReeves dawg lemme ask you a question but please don't cook me with the answer:
Is Nerdcore realer music than videogame osts?

[MoonwalkDelta27 @MoonwalkDelta27]

@lowkirklories kinda? I mean wishing Homophobes a bad month during Pride Month and Misandrists a bad month during Men's Mental Health Awareness Month is pretty consistent. I want to believe that OOP isn't tryna be misogynist but rather is just really particular about consistency or smth idk

[MoonwalkDelta27 @MoonwalkDelta27]

@joserfg4 Pregúntale a tus gobiernos we. El mes del orgullo legalmente no se celebra en la mayoría de países, es más que nada una cosa cultural debido a la continua lucha por sus derechos en países donde se les quiere quitar derechos, o en países donde de plano no los tienen.

[MoonwalkDelta27 @MoonwalkDelta27]

@NekoKirito7 *for one [FUCK]

[MoonwalkDelta27 @MoonwalkDelta27]

@NekoKirito7

[MoonwalkDelta27 @MoonwalkDelta27]

@Koi_cross1ng literally earlier today I saw a Grok-generated edit of MJ without vitiligo and like WHY DIDN'T A HUMAN MAKE IT FIRST all human edits of the same nature just look like pallette-swap 50 year old MJ or 20 year old MJ with wrinkles n shi

[MoonwalkDelta27 @MoonwalkDelta27]

But like fr we're cooked if AI accidentally made ts before ANY human did.

[MoonwalkDelta27 @MoonwalkDelta27]

How the fuck did Grok actually make the very first no-vitiligo old MJ edit that does not look like 20 year old Mike on his 50 year old body? Also L response to the original prompt: Nowhere does it mention "remove the vitiligo"

[Grok @grok]

@reyzaaXso

[MoonwalkDelta27 @MoonwalkDelta27]

@Jirkler @BROONOart @itsreallime yeah yeah fourth time [reply telling a potentially depressed person to stop living] gimme my internet numbers and words

[Nesqüick☕ @NesquickPosta]

Con mi buen amigo @Cointers90 le dimos vueltas a la imagen de la "falacia del goomba" y, al descubrir que lo que quiere decir está expresado medio raro, hice mi propia take a partir de las conclusiones a las que llegamos, para que el mensaje original se conserve y se entienda.

[MoonwalkDelta27 @MoonwalkDelta27]

@Harrul124 @sstateofshock typical 🧃 behaviour