@JoelDalais@BitcoinSvGuide@deggen@ProjectBabbage@LightBSV@___siggi___@bOpen_AI So are we ruling out that there are large players with massive TPS requirements waiting in the wings because BSVA has asked them to hold off until the ecosystem is prepared (and just haven’t told us, to keep it a surprise)?
Can’t be unrealistically wildly optimistic anymore?
Some meat on the bones of the wallet scaling conversation. This kind of research and development, breakdown of facts and numbers, is exactly what is needed - great to see
X money's $1 threshold is not small enough. I'll go broke in one doom-scrolling session. With the XBSV extension, I was able to send 2.4 thousandths of a penny $0.000024 on an X-post. Utilizing micropayments, I can spread the love to more creators and incentivize them to create engaging content. Download the XBSV extension, fund your link wallet with Bitcoin sv, and you're off to the races.
@ProjectBabbage@BitcoinSvGuide@LightBSV@m_murfy@cryptorebel_SV It is a big chunk of change, exactly, thanks for the advice.
For some reason I think we need to be able to offer serious businesses/investors a ready to use download rather than a GitHub repo - a tried and tested trusted product that onboards new entrants with low friction.
@ProjectBabbage@BitcoinSvGuide@LightBSV@m_murfy@cryptorebel_SV People just want to know how to keep their money safe, and a product they can trust.
Banks don’t tell customers to conduct their own risk analysis of banking app security before using their product,
@ProjectBabbage@BitcoinSvGuide@LightBSV@m_murfy@cryptorebel_SV ‘People can store what they want’ and ‘must decide about their own risks’ is not exactly a ringing endorsement for the modern wallets.
Would you be happy to store $250k BSV in BSV Desktop?
If not, how would you go about it?
@ProjectBabbage@BitcoinSvGuide@LightBSV@m_murfy@cryptorebel_SV There was once a recommendation to not put more than $5-$20 on a brc100 wallet - has the security situation changed, or is BSV desktop now a more advanced build?
For people to migrate as suggested, they may want to see a security review or comparison of some kind.
This isn't an opinion; it's an indispensable technical fact. If bitcoin doesn't go up in value it can't work because nobody wants to willingly hold a money that drops in value, and even more importantly, we can only increase its liquidity, market cap, scalability and moneyness by increasing its price, since the supply is fixed. At a price of $1 bitcoin is a $20m joke among nerds online, practically useless for everyone as there's no liquidity. At a price of $10m bitcoin is the biggest money on earth, and necessary for everyone. If you want bitcoin to work you need NGU. Virtue-signaling "tech, not price" is as silly as saying you like car technology but don't care if the car moves.
In May 2017, 58 companies met in New York and decided Bitcoin's future in a hotel room. Users were not invited. Core devs were not in the room. What they agreed, and what actually happened, tells you everything. A thread. #BSV
Many people have been wanting to see Blockchain enabled storage. Most attempts until now have not been scalable. This one is not only scalable, but it can be nearly an order of magnitude cheaper than incumbent solutions, and puts data power back in users hands. This is the way.
@369bsv@collincto@Blockstream We need to reduce the block size immediately to prevent this unacceptable use of the blockchain.
And remove the digital signatures.
@Blockstream can you help? They say you’re good at this.
@johncalhooon@BgansBSV And then something like apple wallet where you keep your cards, but with your different bsv wallets, so you can select your choice easily to use an app.
Then all users can use all apps.
@johncalhooon@BgansBSV In the real fiat world there are a range of payment options. Some vendors don’t take Amex. Some users prefer debit cards or cash. There isn’t a universal system demanded and accepted by all.
Need a good, well branded and promoted BRC100 wallet that everyone can keep handy