Then why are you talking about BTC?
BTC is a centralized system controlled by a small cadre aligned with government and plutocratic interests from the top.
BTC's not distributed in any meaningful sense. A system can only remain decentralized when the protocol is set in stone, so the rules of the game cannot be manipulated.
1BSV, not BTC. Maximise on-chain transactions — "spam is good." The design goal is as many on-chain sends as possible: billions of transactions per game. Anything that reduces tx count to "save" the chain (BTC/Lightning thinking) is wrong.
https://t.co/BJuGVv3f6J
In my opinion... the price of $BSV is wayyyy underpriced.
Soon, it will out-compete every other chain:
- better apps
- more users
- deeper liquidity
- frictionless/easy onboarding
But more importantly, it will truly be a peer to peer ecosystem:
- no middlemen charging you to breathe
- lower barrier to entry
- transparent
And due to that... we have unbounded opportunity.
More than 70% of reported crypto trading volume is fake.
Not suspicious. Not questionable.
Fake.
Peer-reviewed. Cornell. Management Science. 2023.
Thread. 🧵
If you aren’t knee-deep in https://t.co/xkaYxZcawP, right now spending every minute trying to work out what to build for fun or profit, what are you even doing here?
Satoshi didn't just build digital cash.
He was trying to build an entire P2P economy, including onchain poker, an eBay-style marketplace, native escrow systems and more.
Most people never knew this existed.
Now the original Bitcoin Poker game is being brought back to life on BSV Blockchain (the original chain).
This is what Satoshi Vision actually looked like before it got stripped down.
The code was always there (GitHub). They just stopped building it.
What other early Satoshi ideas will resurrect?
"Bitcoin is everything!"
#BSV
For years, we have been invited to admire architectural drawings of palaces that were never built. We were shown sketches of splendid cities suspended in the air and assured that gravity was merely a temporary inconvenience.
Ethereum promised a world of applications that would transform commerce, identity, gaming, finance, ownership, and human cooperation itself. BTC promised a revolution in money that somehow required every useful feature to be removed in the name of progress. Both became masters of anticipation. The future was always arriving tomorrow, and tomorrow developed a remarkable talent for never becoming today.
My ambition is considerably less fashionable.
I intend to take every significant idea that was promised and not delivered, every application declared inevitable but somehow perpetually unavailable, every system that remained trapped inside a white paper, conference presentation, roadmap, or venture capital pitch deck, and turn it into something that actually exists.
Not theories. Not aspirations. Not demonstrations designed for applause.
Code.
Working examples.
Documentation.
Libraries.
Systems that developers can examine, test, extend, improve, and build upon.
The modern age suffers from an excess of visionaries and a shortage of builders. It has produced countless prophets of the future who appear strangely allergic to construction. We have become accustomed to celebrating intentions while quietly excusing results.
I prefer a different standard.
If an idea is worthwhile, it should be implemented. If it can be implemented, it should be documented. If it is documented, it should be placed in the hands of those capable of creating something greater.
The highest compliment one can pay an invention is not admiration. It is use.
My objective is therefore simple: to place into your hands the tools that others promised, so that you may go out and build the future they merely described.
Craig Wright (aka Satoshi Nakomoto) just announced the release of his new systems - A Bitcoin-integrated banking framework, and a system for true digital scarcity.
And nobody is reporting on this.
The game is rigged.
Pay attention before it's too late.
#BSV
@PacArtCollect I think I remember CSW saying tokenised edi’s could save one company, @Walmart a billion/year in edi costs - and he casually slips it into part of a mass code drop like it’s nothing.
One reason the code is going on GitHub is simple.
I do not want a single point of failure.
If the ideas have merit, then the worst thing that could happen is for them to depend upon me.
A technology survives when it is copied.
A protocol survives when it is implemented by others.
A system survives when people build on it, improve it, fork it, adapt it, and take it in directions the original creator never imagined.
That is the entire point of open systems.
If nobody copies it, nobody studies it, nobody forks it, nobody builds with it, then the project deserves to fail.
Ideas survive through adoption.
What concerns me is not criticism.
What concerns me is indifference.
Because if the ideas are valuable, eventually someone will understand their implications.
And once people understand the implications, some will embrace them, some will compete with them, and some will undoubtedly try to suppress them.
That is true of every important technology.
The best defence against that is not secrecy.
The best defence is distribution.
A thousand copies are harder to bury than one.
A thousand developers are harder to silence than one.
A thousand implementations are harder to erase than one.
I have other ways of disseminating the work, and it will get out regardless.
But widespread adoption matters because it accelerates understanding.
The faster people can inspect it, challenge it, improve it, and build on it, the faster the ideas stop belonging to one person and start belonging to the future.
That is why the code is public.
Not because I want control.
Because I want the opposite.
🚨 Hoy 1 de junio de 2026 podríamos estar ante uno de los mayores avances en la historia de Internet. Craig Wright (CSW) @CsTominaga quien muchos pensamos que es Satoshi Nakamoto, el creador de Bitcoin, podría haber encontrado una forma de crear bienes digitales verdaderamente transferibles, donde la posesión pasa de una persona a otra sin intermediarios, sin custodios y sin las limitaciones de los NFT actuales. Por primera vez, la propiedad digital podría comportarse como la propiedad física: cuando la transfieres, deja de ser tuya y pasa a ser de otra persona. Esto sería la creación de una economía digital basada en propiedad real, escasez real y transferencia real. Si funciona como se describe, podría cambiar para siempre la forma en que entendemos los activos digitales. #BSV #Bitcoin #CraigWright
By forking PostgreSQL and embedding triple-entry accounting + BSV tokenisation directly into the database engine, the system can:
Ingest real invoices and shipping documents automatically
Record them as cryptographically verifiable triple-entry entries
Tokenise them on BSV
Provide proofs that everything balances and is auditable
Integrate with the rest of the ecosystem (payments, access control, NFTs)
https://t.co/CKELOR6Yju