@ChiefNosey@47817177@VeteranIrish I think most of the Fighters were lost in air-to-air combat or shot down by anti-aircraft fire from ships. May be the reconaissance planes that were generally shot on the ground, although I don't claim to be an expert, could be one for @RDPHistory
Henry Nowak died the same way a civilization dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit. His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.
Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response—the only response—is righteous anger. One of the most important things the Trump administration has proven to the world is that stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership. Anything else is an excuse.
It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilization. We love our country. We love our children. And nobody—nobody—should ever die the way that Henry Nowak died. May God comfort those who loved him, and may God rest his soul.
''A Somali migrant just stabbed one of my mates to death in the street.''
''Yep, I know your rent's gone up, and you're looking for some one to blame.''
''Oh my God, there's a jihadi just sawing off a Jewish bloke's head over there. Oh my God.''
''Yep, it's a real cost of living crisis.''
''Oh my God there's blood everywhere. Oh my God, somebody call the police. Oh my God.''
''Yep, that's big business for you.''
.@zarahsultana I assume this is a different Zarah Sultana MP to the one who was recently filmed clapping along to loudspeaker chants for intifada, on a street in Surrey.
https://t.co/J9nLlYtw59
Triple stabbing allegedly by an Afghan man in London, man randomly slaughtered as he’s out walking his dog…just a small little story at the bottom of the BBC’s homepage. It’s actually below a story about the government’s ‘options’ on asylum seeker accommodation. I hate this.
"It's an appalling stance!"
"He's a champagne socialist and a coward... it's a dreadful thing!"
Simon Jordan reacts to Gary Neville admitting he removed a Union Jack flag from one of his development sites in Manchester.
Still less talk of the simple fact that anti-semitism and other vile attitudes (towards women etc) are clearly present among a hefty % of British Muslims, meaning we in fact are fundamentally divided in a way no platitude is going to cover up or wish away
Here we go with the usual routine today. A) Find some irrelevant talking point to distract attention - social media trolls or something B) The 'don't let them divide us/don't look back in anger' sentimental nonsense. Obvs no talk of Islamist extremism, the actual problem
I have no words. I don't understand how to live in a world where someone would take a father away from his young children for having a different opinion.
So according to the rules, Sam Kerr is an actual racist.
Yet the progressives rather give her a free pass and ignore it because she identifies as an Indigenous lesbian.
I want to know why Axel Rudakubana's father did not stop him. I want to know who these people are and what they believe. I want to know why his father did not march his son to a police station, not least after he found him preparing a school massacre. I want to know how a boy can turn up at school TEN times with a knife and not be sectioned. I want to know why Prevent is not preventing horrific attacks like this one and is clearly no longer fit for purpose. I want to know why the school, social services, the local council, and others did not stop this psychopath despite countless warnings. I want to know why Prevent and the state appear utterly obsessed with the right-wing when 70% of terrorist attacks in this country since 2018 have been Islamist and three-quarters of MI5's caseload is Islamist. I want to know why Westminster and legacy media fell over themselves to share details of other terrorist attacks but went silent over this one. I want to know why Keir Starmer has previously tweeted about attacks on the actual day they occurred calling them "terrorism" but refused to do so in this case. I want to know why the state keeps letting people who murder our children, from Axel Rudakubana to Manchester bomber Salman Abedi, fall through the cracks. I want to know why the media gaslit us by presenting this boy as a nice Dr Who choirboy from the Welsh valleys when they knew he had a long history of violence, had been referred to Prevent, and had ricin. I want to know why Keir Starmer casually branded many people in this country "far right" before they even went to court but now is suddenly obsessed with contempt of court procedure. I want to know why Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner derided people for spreading "fake news" and "conspiracy theories" when they suggested this was linked to terrorism when we now know that SHE knew this guy had been referred to counter-terrorism authorities three times. I want to know why much of the political, media, and cultural class in this country piled in on Nigel Farage, even trying to describe the unrest as the "Farage Riots", when everything he was saying about the truth being withheld was right. I want to know why, even today, they are not apologising. I want to know why Keir Starmer is now trying to convince us there is a 'new' form of lone-wolf terrorism when, from David Copeland in 1999 onwards, this has been obvious to everybody for decades. I want to know why if this had been a white British boy who stabbed three black girls to death and injured many more, who was then later found with far-right literature and ricin, we all know the response from Starmer, Cooper, Rayner and much of the media would have been entirely different. I want to know why Keir Starmer talks about "protecting our children" while *literally* not being able to tell us who is coming into our country through our broken borders and why. I want to know why, as with the rape gangs, nobody in positions of power, in these state authorities, is on primetime news apologising to the country. And I want to know why we are now having this utterly ridiculous debate about Amazon, 'buying knives online' and social media when, in reality, what this is about is how our leaders continue to let masses of people into our country from high conflict, highly violent societies who do not think like us, do not act like us, do not share our values or respect our laws, and do not care about us. Yesterday, Keir Starmer said he is "drawing a line in the sand". He should start by apologising to the people of this country for how he and his government have handled Southport as well as the rape gangs, both of which will now go down in history as powerful symbols of the total incompetence and inability of the state to keep us safe. And then he should announce he is ending the extreme policy of mass uncontrolled immigration which is destabilising our communities and nation, will do whatever necessary to fix our broken borders, will completely overhaul Prevent, will actually develop an integration strategy for this country (we do not have one!) and will start treating hardworking, taxpaying British people with the respect and decency they deserve by authorising major inquiries into not only Southport but the rape gangs. That would be a start.
We want to know the truth. And we want to change the direction of our country.
"Would I risk my life to defeat evil?"
None of us truly know.
The reason we remember the men who stormed the beaches on D Day is not only to honour them. It's also to keep alive the part of us that compels us to step up and confront the evil of our day without fear.
The Left's chief mode of argument nowadays is language policing, attributing hidden motives to their opponents, and making spurious accusations of racism. Not actually debating anything of substance
Still listening to this "debate" between an archaeologist and a pseudoarchaeologist (- it's a long listen). It involves the presentation of how science works & the importance of big data, on the one hand - vs personal conviction, ideology and cherry-picked cases, with a complete ignorance of how science works, on the other. At its heart it's a conversation between science and utter nonsense.
And it's extraordinary that Netflix gives that nonsense a platform. It's not "cancelling" to reject such nonsense, it's quality control.
Most of Scotland is upset and offended by Yousaf’s bumbling incompetence and illiberal authoritarianism, but we aren’t lobbying to have him locked up for it.