Morgan McComb

[Laura Loomer @LauraLoomer]

NEW:

🚨 Charity Funds Vanish in Alleged Bankruptcy Looting Scheme 🚨

Roughly $270 million in charitable assets allegedly disappeared through the bankruptcy of Highland Capital Management, according to a legal memo that is now urging the Department of Justice to investigate.

The memo claims a charity’s stake in the firm was redeemed for just $1.6 million before being “laundered” through a court-approved settlement, allowing the bulk of the value to be redirected elsewhere. Beneficiaries of the transactions reportedly included investment funds linked to prominent Democratic donors, among them GCM Grosvenor’s Michael Sacks (an Obama Foundation board member and top donor to former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel), as well as Tom Steyer’s @TomSteyer Farallon Capital.

Tom Steyer recently ran for Governor of California, where fraud is rampant.

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz @mattgaetz has described the allegations as outright theft, alleging the use of “fake companies and manipulated valuations” to siphon the funds. He has called on Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche @DAGToddBlanche to open an investigation.

[Juanita Broaddrick @atensnut]

How is this not a federal investigation right now?

$269M has been allegedly stolen from veterans’ charities using fake companies and no one seems to care.

The foundations that owned the money didn’t even know it was happening to them.

Our veterans deserve better.

[Morgan McComb @MorganMcComb]

@aaron_reitz @KenPaxtonTX Excellent!!

[Morgan McComb @MorganMcComb]

@TrueTexasTea This is maddening

[Morgan McComb @MorganMcComb]

@DogsontheRunDoc @AskATranswidow Yuck

[Morgan McComb @MorganMcComb]

@TrueTexasTea I love your writing. Root it up!

[The Chris Salcedo Show @CSalcedoShow]

Americans Are Tired Of Leftists & Fake-GOP Who Cater To Them https://t.co/sIP7CjVZO6

[Morgan McComb @MorganMcComb]

@MattMackowiak Newsflash. This has been tried already and failed. Are you insane? Wait…yes yes you are 😅

[Carlos Turcios @Carlos__Turcios]

🚨ABOLISH TRANSGENDERISM🚨 “Transgenderism is not only a disease, it’s a dark distortion of natural order and God-ordained gender,” Gill told The Dallas Express. “Those who further entrap the young and vulnerable should face consequences.”

Read the latest👇

@dallasexpress

[Morgan McComb @MorganMcComb]

@TexasCatHerder @scottbraddock Scott. Please stop. It’s not my account. This is my acct.

[Morgan McComb @MorganMcComb]

@TexasCatHerder @scottbraddock

[Morgan McComb @MorganMcComb]

@TexasCatHerder @scottbraddock They never learn.

[SaltyGoat @SaltyGoat17]

Best song on the internet right now. Bar NONE!😂👇🏻

[Morgan McComb @MorganMcComb]

@TruthTellingJ @Bannons_WarRoom @aaron_reitz Memory jolt! https://t.co/KRrwgIvUSQ

[Morgan McComb @MorganMcComb]

@AskATranswidow @grdevine Shared!!

[Ask A Transwidow @AskATranswidow]

I would like to register my support for SB 8 with the following caveat: SB8 is meaningless unless Texas Legislature amends the Texas Family Code Section 2.005 (b) (8) to remove "sex change".

This portion of the code states that a court order is sufficient to establish a change of sex. This creates a legal obstacle to the enforcement of the Texas Women's Privacy https://t.co/4uxzsDgHXM recognizing a court order of sex change as legally sufficient proof of sex for official purposes, § 2.005(b)(8) allows a male to be legally classified as female. Once reclassified, such an individual could claim access to female-only spaces, directly undermining SB 8’s protections. he two statutes are in direct tension:

SB 8: “female” means biological female.

Family Code § 2.005(b)(8): a court can declare a male to be legally female. Thus, the privacy protections SB 8 seeks to secure may be rendered unenforceable by operation of the Family Code.

While I do believe females deserve to have the dignity of female only spaces (with notable exceptions for disabled or minors in the company of a caregiver) is appropriate. I do hope the bill passes, it amounts to nothing more than political theater and half-hearted or empty measures when the legislature moves forward without full knowledge of the history of its own body's policymaking. This passage would be a great headline for Republican lawmakers, but it will not protect women and girls.

To preserve the intent of SB 8, the Family Code should be amended to clarify that a court order of sex change does not alter biological sex for the purposes of statutes concerning sex-segregated facilities, privacy, or safety provisions.

A possible amendment could read:

“For purposes of this Code and other statutes relating to privacy, safety, or the use of sex-segregated facilities, the terms ‘male’ and ‘female’ shall be defined by biological sex at birth. A court order relating to a change of sex under Subsection (b)(8) shall not alter this definition.”

Without amendment, SB 8’s protections for women’s privacy are vulnerable to circumvention through judicial recognition of sex changes under the Family Code. To harmonize Texas law and safeguard the legislative intent of SB 8, the Legislature should amend § 2.005(b)(8) (and related provisions) to clarify that a legal recognition of gender reassignment does not override statutory protections for female-only spaces based on biological sex.

[Carlos Turcios @Carlos__Turcios]

🚨DEMOCRAT MELTDOWN🚨 Texas Black Republican Rep. Katrina Pierson TORCHES Dems over their smear that GOP maps are racist:

“More and More minoroty voters are voting their values not their skin color.”

Democrats ran away!

Follow: @Carlos__Turcios

[✨Red✨ @mcucolo57]

MUST WATCH:
ONE OF THE BEST TRUMP SPEECHES OF ALL TIME. ✨🇺🇸✨ GOD BLESS PRESIDENT TRUMP. 🙏

[✨💫Cali💫✨ @505Cali2]

Jasmin Crockett has been erased

[A Man Of Memes @RickyDoggin]

🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸