For those who do not understand why Danny Tommo wasn’t given bail: it's completely and utterly obvious for anyone who isn't totally braindead.
Tommo is a convicted criminal who served two years for attempted kidnapping. He was already on conditional bail following six criminal charges in April, with a hearing due in October, when he was filmed slashing a dinghy with a rescue worker still aboard. He refused to confirm his abode to the police.
A serious previous conviction, a new criminal allegation while already on bail from 6 other charges, no fixed abode: this is a slam dunk "no bail" scenario. Not a conspiracy.
Comparing him with the five men arrested near RAF Fairford is utterly disingenuous. It's obvious by now that these were petty criminals stealing fuel, not terrorists. They were fully identified, having given fixed abodes, and no one is a flight risk for a petty attempted crime. I also guarantee none of them were already on bail from previous charges.
So please, stop with the false outrage. No one genuinely believes these scenarios are comparable.
I love these. Haha! Proof positive I’m a geezer. That leg thing is brilliant! It’s called fat thighs, chump. Those knees are never going to be close neighbours. Specially not since I squeezed three babies out of my knob.
The lovely people at Fabulous Films have given me one of these to give away.
You will get it a couple of weeks before it's released.
All you have to do is retweet this tweet & I will select a winner at random.
Good Luck!!
https://t.co/JKUKtlOykc
@AvonandsomerRob I would highly recommend against doing this. We paid £250k for our lodge and barely broke even each month with letting over the two years we owned it. Site fees are horrendous and we took a huge hit selling it. Big mistake!