@KarenJukes2@raelbrav@reformparty_uk are just Controlled Opposition.
Nigel's been rumbled.
They've taken in many of the Tories who helped put the country in the state it's in today.
I don't care if Burnham wins but @reformtheUKnow MUST build and therefore must stand in any/all elections until a GE.
@WHYAMIAPIMOC@TheFreds@bbcquestiontime@UKLabour@Conservatives@LibDems I agree but may I point out regarding item 3, even if we bar foreigners from decision-making in our governance, it is the suicidal empathy of many of our homegrown people who will act against the country due to their woke mindset.
@Jul78821Julie@DanielJHannan@LordWeirDUP Equally important, we should defend the choice of the Chagossian people to decide their future and not simply hand them and their home over to a country they do not want to join.
@MarkHal87606381@DanielJHannan@LordWeirDUP Because Starmer has made his entire career being a "human rights" lawyer.
He is beholden to organisations like the UN and other unelected "international" bodies.
He will always take the UN's side on anything, even when it is harmful to his own country.
He is UN first, UK last.
@Eyes_wittnes@r00trick@rightsidefreee@Rothmus The supply of racism was not meeting their needs to manufacture outrage, so it looks like the SPLC had to find some subcontractors to churn some out.
@Ajaon_of_All@sainsburys The news article referred to features the phrase "after studies found".
That phrase should actually be "we found a couple of studies that supports what we want to do".
For the right money, you can always find a scientist to produce a "study" that says what you want.
Keir Starmer attacks Elon Musk for “interfering in our politics” and “whipping up division” over the Henry Nowak case.
This is the same man who knelt for George Floyd and sent Labour activists to campaign against Trump in America.
Musk didn’t create division — he amplified the truth about police failures that left an 18-year-old British student to bleed out. Starmer wants to silence scrutiny, not deliver justice.
The British people see through the hypocrisy. Musk exposes what Starmer wants buried.
Man-made Climate Change through CO2 production is a myth created to make us all poorer colder and less free.
The wind turbines are an expensive waste of money
The solar panels are an expensive waste of money.
Ed Miliband and his Conservative predecessors have destroyed our industrial base and taxed us based on pseudo science.
Our children are still being taught this nonsense in schools and universities. It’s brain washing not education.
It has to stop before our country and people are damaged further.
It’s total bollocks. A vote for Restore is a vote for Restore. That’s a fact. If Restore’s Rebecca Shepherd gets more votes than any other candidate in Makerfield, then she will have won and become an MP. Also a fact. This could happen (another fact). Make it happen Makerfield. Show the liars what’s what.
There is nothing he can do.
He promised to be transparent in office. His first action was to give Lord Alli a Nr 10 pass in return for buying him & his wife clothes.
He promised to smash the gangs. How is that going?
His handling of Southport was a disgrace. Turned up for 20 seconds. But when a mosque is attacked, spends all day there. Hands over £10m.
Then those who demand he finally does something are labeled „far right“, because he believes he can ignore them.
Then he has Gromit destroying what little industry we have whilst Rachel is taxing us into oblivion whilst the pie muncher Lammy is going full tonto, banning jury trials.
Then he’s hidden what Nick Brown was up to. He took the knee for George Floyd but had to be FORCED by Lindsay Hoyle to say Henry Nowaks name.
I could go on. Do you now see why he’s the biggest wanker we‘ve ever had as PM?
@TomK_Brit1993 I didn't like him as Leader of the Opposition and he has only reinforced my distaste for him since becoming PM.
There is absolutely nothing he could do short of calling a General Election that would change my opinion of him.
I’ve been reading the judgment in the Henry Nowak case. The judge says the police officers at the scene were misled by lies told to them. Believing Henry was the offender, they arrested and handcuffed him.
Moments later they realised he had a serious chest wound and began desperately trying to save his life. As a result the judge concluded that the officers did their best in extremely difficult circumstances.
Perhaps.
However, Henry was bleeding; he told the officer he’d been stabbed and he was struggling to breathe. Shouldn’t that have prompted a more thorough search for injuries before the handcuffs came out and were snapped onto his wrists?
The judge says the wound wasn’t obvious. It was dark and Henry was wearing a dark top. He also pointed out in his judgment that the officers had been given a convincing but false account of what had happened.
All of which may be true, but what he is not doing is ruling on whether the police response was correct. That’s for the separate investigations now under way.
However, if someone gasps that they’ve been stabbed is it unreasonable to expect that possibility to be investigated first? In those circumstances, should concern for a potentially life-threatening injury take precedence over treating someone as a suspect?
Genuine question.
It is not the natural order of things for your child to die before you and under such devastating circumstances. My thoughts are with his parents as Henry’s murderer is sentenced to life in prison.