The only reason there is room to attack the 250,000 figure is because the government and institutions systematically covered up the gangs for so long and didn’t record the figures. It’s literally impossible to know now, and extrapolations/estimates are all we have.
It is ghoulish to use the government’s own coverup to dismiss the greatest crime ever committed on our shores.
Even if there's valid procedural issues with the inquiry, you must have known giggling about it was a bad look.
There are ways to raise objections without looking like a point-scoring ghoul who is indifferent to the subject matter - which is exactly what you're now trying to project onto the authors.
I wasn’t laughing at Rape Gang Survivors. I founded an organisation dedicated to supporting rape gang survivors.
I was laughing at Charlie Downes, Harrison Pitt, and Alistair Harrison because they are contemptible people. I hold them in contempt for harming survivors.
@TheAngryBadger3@CaptainLore_ Whether he canonically would have one, and whether we should see him flip around with one like a retarded frog, are different things.
No I believe it was Trump that made that U-turn, and many people were done with him at that point.
Trump doesn't speak for all 'Republicans' and certainly doesn't represent 'The Right'.
MY perspective relates mainly to the ongoing 'Rape Gang' scandal in the UK which was the subject of Garret's post - in order to defend multiculturalism, leftists will say stuff like "most rapists and paedos are white men though". They ignore 'per capita' in order to make this asinine point.
It's also my experience that leftists often project. If they're guilty of something, they assume you must be too. It's a big self-report.
The way I would sprint over to show off my grip strength. "Alright, stand back folks. Watch a master at work." I pull the bars apart with ease. *everyone claps* "But wait, there's more." I then hold the baby above my head and tear it in half, the claps turn into shrieks of horror