@chenzeling4 From diskโฆ
Whatโs the output speed? I bet itโll take 50x the time for the model to respond from disk instead of RAM.
Novel idea, tho.
@ImSh4yy If itโs fable levelโฆ shouldnโt we treat it as such???
Just lower the reasoning level to medium. And set it up as an orchestrator ๐คทโโ๏ธ
@DeepakNesss maybe better? I'm considering to back to cursor instead of codex. Interesting stuff going on, now. Pretty exciting
https://t.co/VcxOGi3P0s
I'm on the $100/mo Claude Max plan and I have been running Fable 5, pretty much non-stop since it was released, and can't seem to hit any usage limits.
About 95% of what I do from a coding perspective, only requires Fable 5 Low and Medium. (and note, low and medium are out-performing Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 High and xHigh in a lot of benchmarks)
And I have been blown away with how good Fable Medium is at planning, it's better than Opus Max IMO. So thoughtful and detailed.
I have used Fable High on some really detailed architecture decisions, but have really focused on giving it tightly-scoped plans so I leverage the thinking depth correctly.
Fable has written over 1M lines of code for me in the last 24 hours.
And just to repeat, I'm on the $100/mo plan, not hitting any usage limits, never moved me down to Opus, haven't hit a single guardrail.
I think the biggest mistake ppl are making with this model is running it with High effort, in cases where Low or Medium will return the exact same output.
Still a lot more testing and benchmarking to do, but my guess is most engineers only need Fable High 1% - 5% of the time.
So if you're using High Effor 100% of the time, and hitting limits on your 20x plan, this is probably why.
bet you don't know this:
Fable 5 Low is CHEAPER / BETTER / FASTER than Opus 4.8 Max
if you use Cursor or similar and you pay per usage....
you'll save a ton of time and money + get better results
@Wotwot96@LottoLabs This.
Pure LLM vibing just leads to spaghetti code down the line. Hard to debug.
Augmented coding is where itโs at. Hardest part of code isnโt the syntax but the systems thinking to create smth.
Like a house.
Thatโs why architects exist.
@ImAnnoying_AF@SovereignIM Mhmmm, you have no idea how many phrases just stick in your mind for years.
Video, audio and images are dangerous tools.
For good or evil.
Just text is fine, tho.
I like Twitter & Substack.
@SovereignIM Reading about it should be fine.
Similar to reading a report from a messenger about a city countries away.
Itโs the video news and audio thatโs not okay. Our mind canโt differentiate between reality and digital equivalent.