so let me get this right:
Oracle says Openai committed $300B for cloud compute → oracle stock jumps 36% (best day since 1992)
Oracle runs on Nvidia GPUs → has to buy billions in chips from Nvidia
Nvidia just announced they're investing $100B into openai
Openai uses that money to... pay oracle... who pays Nvidia... who invests in Openai
@StephenKing "Whoops, I perpetuated a false narrative and stoked the flames of hate. My bad." Meanwhile, a man was slaughtered in front of his wife and child as a result of this false narrative that you are complicit in perpetuating. Let this act as the catalyst for your change.
🚨 WTF?! MSNBC is now saying there is NO "THEME" in the assassination of Charlie Kirk, DESPITE Tyler Robinson having anti-fascist engravings and an anti-Nazi song on the bullet casings.
They want to bury it. "Nothing to see here. Look away." NEVER.
Here's the thing you need to understand: before we get any definitive confirmation of Tyler Robinson's political views, they don't matter. The fact is millions of Leftists all over the country celebrated Charlie Kirk's murder.
They wanted a guy who promoted freedom of speech and open debate dead because they didn't like what he had to say, and they showed the world who they are. They showed the world they want anyone who disagrees with them to die. They joined hands in celebration of political violence and showed the world their sadism and vitriol.
They saw a man die in front of his daughter, blood pouring from his neck, and immediately took to social media to laugh and gloat about it, to rub it in your face. They wanted credit for the murder, and forfeited their dubious claim to the moral high ground the instant they believed they had won some imaginary victory, until the cancel culture they love so much came for them.
So while the Leftists wipe the sweat from their foreheads upon seeing doubt of the assassin's political views and immediately resume their mockery, don't forget what they did. Don't forget what they showed you. Don't forget what they wanted you to see of them. They were proud of the evil they displayed until the fear of consequences kicked in.
Tyler Robinson is one man. He has been caught and he will be punished. You remain surrounded by people who have no respect for freedom of speech, no interest in debate, and who would celebrate your death.
Keep screenshotting them. Keep exposing them. Don't forget and don't let them forget. Remember until the midterm elections and vote with all your spite.
@MHutton93@scrowder It's a 30-06. It's a common caliber rifle used for hunting. It's not hard to get, nor is shooting a target at approx 130 yards away, particularly with the use of optics
@Brian_Peotter@scrowder@grok@grok while Robinson disagreed with Kirk's views, many Republicans may disagree with some of his views. What other details are available that would indicate the shooter is a democrat?
**Dear left and media outlets. I implore you all. PLEASE. Look at this article and critically think about how backwards and
divisive this is. Charlie was executed. People celebrated. Those upset by celebrations of murder are now labeled extremists? STOP THE DIVISIVE PROPAGANDA
Extremists and an anonymously run website are posting identifying details about people accused of celebrating Charlie Kirk's murder online. Some of those targeted are now getting death threats. https://t.co/SOxeBSGT93
@xMikeMac Because he epitomized free speech? Because he inspired tens of millions people? Because he may have been our president one day and when you think about what could have been, what was robbed from those tens of millions of people, it's hard not to be moved?
🚨JUST IN: On the direction of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the State Department will ban any foreigner who celebrated the assassination of Charlie Kirk online from entering the US.
This is textbook war propaganda dressed up in polished rhetoric. We've seen this playbook before: "They’re enriching uranium," "they violated non-proliferation obligations," "they rejected peaceful alternatives." It's all meant to desensitize the public into accepting the next foreign entanglement under the illusion of inevitability and necessity. It has "Iraq has WMDs" energy all over it. Just replace Colin Powell with JD Vance.
Let’s cut through the fog:
1. Civilian vs. military enrichment—this framing is misleading.
Yes, low-enriched uranium (LEU) is typically under 5% U-235 concentration, and weapons-grade is around 90%. But there’s a growing body of civilian nuclear tech that benefits from higher enrichment—known as HALEU (High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium), usually defined as 5–20% U-235. Iran’s enrichment level has peaked around 60%, which is not weapons-grade and is not a smoking gun.
Why would a nation want uranium enriched above LEU levels? Because next-generation reactors—especially small modular reactors (SMRs), fast reactors, and molten salt reactors—require HALEU for higher burn-up, greater efficiency, and smaller waste profiles. These reactors offer energy independence and longer refueling intervals, which are especially attractive for developing countries under threat of sanctions or regime change.
2. Less enrichment ≠ more peace.
Insisting Iran accept a deal that allows them civilian nuclear power but prohibits enrichment is not diplomacy. It's coercion. No sovereign nation is going to trust the West after Libya gave up its program and got bombed, or after the U.S. pulled out of the JCPOA despite Iran’s verified compliance. The IAEA's own reports show Iran was abiding by the deal until the U.S. unilaterally broke it. Trust, once broken, is hard to earn back—especially when it involves national security.
3. Let’s talk non-proliferation.
Iran is a signatory to the NPT and has allowed unprecedented inspections. Israel, by contrast, has never signed the NPT, has undeclared nuclear weapons, and faces no consequences. So when JD Vance feigns outrage about violations of “non-proliferation obligations,” he’s not making a moral argument—he’s making a geopolitical one. It’s about control, not compliance.
4. This isn’t about nuclear safety. It’s about control over a region.
If Washington cared about nuclear proliferation, they wouldn’t be sending billions to Saudi Arabia to build reactors without IAEA safeguards. This is about justifying a future strike or escalation—something Vance openly concedes is “on the table.” That’s not restraint. That’s a veiled threat. That’s a setup.
5. The American people’s goals?
No, JD. The American people don’t want more war. They want affordable gas, peace, and an end to the military-industrial complex looting our future. They’ve been lied to before. Many of us fought in those wars and buried friends because of those lies. You don’t get to wave the flag and say “trust us” again.
6. The technological reality:
New nuclear tech—including Generation IV reactors like the TerraPower Natrium design—requires higher enrichment and results in less nuclear waste per kilowatt-hour. This is because:
Higher enrichment allows for longer fuel cycles, meaning the reactor operates longer without refueling.
It improves thermal efficiency and fuel utilization, especially in fast reactors.
It supports reactors that can burn existing nuclear waste (transuranics), further reducing long-term storage needs.
Countries like Iran pursuing this technology could actually reduce global nuclear waste, not increase it. But none of that fits into the narrative when the real goal is regional dominance, not non-proliferation.