@Fooney_@UShouldn_tCare@NCyotee@atlanticesque I’m not talking to you anymore. I was only interested in giving correct info to the person inquiring, and doing so means combatting the incorrect things you’re saying. You have been confused and incorrect since the beginning. I have zero obligation to you in this conversation
@NCyotee@atlanticesque The person I responded to here is an intellectual pussy. I have no clue why they blocked me over a civil conversation or how on Earth they thought I was talking about freeway entrances. People are reading whatever tf they want
@UShouldn_tCare@Fooney_@NCyotee@atlanticesque Yeah I mean when he says things like “not letting someone zipper doesn’t create an unsafe situation” we can actually just disregard everything else he says because he is so blatantly just saying random shit to try to “win” the argument
He knows he’s wrong but can’t admit it
@maryz765@6Transitz@VoteHub We could glue your eyes open and force you to stare at the evidence of the accusations being made against Hamaway for 24h and you would never understand the truth bc you don’t want to
@Fooney_@UShouldn_tCare@NCyotee@atlanticesque You stated your opinion as if it was the law and you were wrong. I stated the actual law. Now you’re pretending like there’s some nuance here I’m not getting so you can save face and “regain control” of the conversation? Have fun with that. I will yield to your recklessness
@NCyotee@atlanticesque Incorrect. Unless you mean a specific state or town has this rule. But the standard across the country is the opposite; thru lane has right-of-way and mergers must yield
@UShouldn_tCare@Fooney_@NCyotee@atlanticesque No, on a regular US road the merging driver does not have any right of way. They must time their own entrance into the flow of traffic.
The people above are wrong. I looked it up. Drivers in the thru lane have right-of-way. Those in the closing lane must yield.
@atlanticesque His current stance means more traffic and more accident potential for everyone. He should feel pressured to change his view, and you’ve done so kindly.
@TheBonePile@bannedby@HummingbirdRSO@davidalisk@thejohnpeterson You, doing a thing improperly and inefficiently yet being mad at the people doing the same thing properly and efficiently and thus getting ahead, are actually the one with the third world mindset here
@Badhombre Do you think Nate knows this and is just being intellectually dishonest by dancing around the obvious conclusions? Or do you think that somehow someone as smart as him is unable to recognize these obvious truths? Idk personally
@talexratcliffe You’re saying that it could definitely work, but the reason we shouldn’t even try is bc it’s…designed to frustrate you? Lmao a little dramatic aren’t we? And your solution is to…create an unsafe scenario w/ someone you think doesn’t care??? Brilliant
@memeticsisyphus You’re playing word games just like a manipulative liberal to get your “point” across
The reason everyone is stationary in the first place is gap denial and improper speed by the thru lane. You’re exhibiting 3rd-world “me first” thinking that costs everyone including yourself
@minnich65089@ScottPresler This is exactly how victims speak about their manipulators and abusers or cult members their leaders: you’ve never felt this way about a politician before, he’s unique and gives you hope, his eyes shine…
You sound in love. Legitimately seek help, you’re going down a dark path