@Jerlebi_@MaulanaSikander The littering is referring to “jihad of the black bags” 😂😂 he was challenged to a mubahala! Now I understand why you are also saying “littering” 😂😂😂
I would not go so far as to call him a paid scholar; that is a far-fetched accusation. However, his apparent ignorance of geopolitics and Islamic jurisprudence is astonishing.
He criticises the Taliban for establishing diplomatic relations with India, seemingly failing to distinguish between diplomatic engagement and ideological allegiance. The Islamic Emirate maintains that its governance is founded upon Islamic law and principles. Diplomatic relations do not automatically constitute a compromise of those principles.
This is a nation that fought against a coalition of international powers, including those who supported the military campaign against it, among them Iran. Yet Iran now enjoys the support of certain circles because of the bizarre assumption that anyone who opposes or strikes Israel must necessarily be righteous. Iran's destructive role across the Muslim world hardly requires a degree in geopolitics to decipher.
Ironically, this same individual was advocating a jihād against black bags in Birmingham — a rhetoric that would have pleased the Zionists more than anyone else.
Meanwhile, there was scarcely a word about jihād or supporting the Mujāhidīn in Gaza until the matter was pressed, and Allāh enabled this weak servant to voice support for them and help normalise that discussion.
Unfortunately, much of this discourse has descended into “Oppose others merely to gain recognition.”
@WakeelMubariz There’s only one real scholar in uk, same area as this guy, @MaulanaSikander , Maulana also challenged this paid agent to a mubahala as he was distorting the meaning of jihad!
Asmāʾ bint Yazīd al-Anṣāriyyah (r.a.), came to the Prophet ﷺ while he was among his Companions and said:
“May my father and mother be sacrificed for you! I have come to you as a representative of the women. I know—may my soul be sacrificed for you—that there is no woman in the East or the West who hears of my coming to you, or does not hear of it, except that she shares the same view as me.
Indeed, Allāh has sent you with the truth to men and women alike, and so we have believed in you and in your Lord who sent you. Yet we, the community of women, are confined and restricted, remaining within your homes, fulfilling your desires and carrying your children, while you, the men, have been favoured over us with attending the Friday prayer and congregational prayers, visiting the sick, attending funerals, performing Ḥajj after Ḥajj, and, better than all of that, jihād in the path of Allāh.
When one of you goes out for Ḥajj, ʿUmrah or ribāṭ, we safeguard your wealth, weave your garments and raise your children. Do we not share with you in the reward, Oh Messenger of Allāh?”
The Prophet ﷺ turned completely towards his Companions and then said:
“Have you ever heard a woman ask a better question concerning the affairs of her religion than this woman has?”
They replied:
“Oh Messenger of Allāh, we never imagined that a woman could be guided to something like this.”
The Prophet ﷺ then turned towards her and said:
“Depart, Oh woman, and inform the women behind you that for one of you to be a good wife to her husband, to seek his pleasure and to follow him in what he approves is equivalent to all of that.”
The woman then departed, glorifying Allāh and proclaiming His greatness out of joy.
[Shuʿab al-Īmān]
Black Wednesday: today Sept 23, the 16th anniversary of #aafia receiving 86 yrs in prison when she was the victim not the criminal (and that on top of the 7.5 yrs of torture she had already suffered). @Aafiamovement@FowziaSiddiqui
The case of the Birmingham Four should concern every person who claims to stand for justice. Four men sentenced to life, ten years behind bars, and serious allegations that the very process which put them there was fundamentally unjust.
Islām does not recognise 'justice' which changes according to political pressure, public opinion or the interests of those in authority. Allāh commands the believer to stand firmly for justice even when it goes against himself, his family or those closest to him. Even hatred for another people is not permitted to move us an inch away from justice.
This is what separates Islamic justice from selective justice in favour of Zionists.
A Muslim does not ask: Who will be embarrassed if the truth comes out? Which institution will be exposed? What will people say?
He asks: What is the truth, and what will I answer before Allāh?
Ten years have passed. Ten Ramaḍāns. Ten ʿĪds. Children have grown and parents have aged while these men have remained behind bars.
Evidences were mishandled, testimonies were unreliable, and many wrongdoings took place in securing these convictions. It must be exposed regardless of who was responsible. Islām does not permit us to protect the strong at the expense of the weak.
The Prophet ﷺ stated:
“How can Allāh purify a people when they do not secure justice for their weak against their strong?” [Ibn Mājah]
Courts can close cases. Institutions can defend reputations. People can remain silent under pressure. But no case is closed before Allāh until He decides.
The Prophet ﷺ said:
"Oh Abū Hurayrah, an hour of justice is better than sixty years of worship — spending its nights in prayer and its days in fasting. And Oh Abū Hurayrah, an hour of injustice in judgement is more severe and graver in the sight of Allah than the sins of sixty years.”
[Al-Targhīb wa’l-Tarhīb]
Dr. Zakir Naik talks about female education in Afghanistan while answering a question (summary);
There is lots of misinformation in the media when it comes to Afghanistan. Girls are allowed to study until year 6, everyone can get their primary education, but after year 6, they are saying that the situation in Afghanistan is not very safe for women, so when the situation improves, and a more suitable environment is reached, then they may continue to higher education.
As for Islamic studies, women can study up to PhD, there is no restriction in this area.
They may not have a certain higher education of the Western world, therefore assuming that they believe higher education is wrong, then this is a misinformation.
As for secondary education, they don’t have the facilities, they don’t have female teachers, so they are waiting for a more suitable environment. If some delays the education till they have the right teachers, then there is no problem at all. But the delay should not be too much…
May Allah give more such soldiers to the Muslim Ummah.
may Allah accept his martyrdom and services in the path of Allah.
each son of this Ummah should follow steps of such mujahideen and stand against the systems of Dajjal.
Al-Qassam Brigades publish a video of their former military spokesman, Huthaifa al-Kahlout, “Abu Obaida,” on the first anniversary of his assassination.
The answer given here is deeply problematic and, frankly, astonishing.
The two plaques display the names Allāh and Muḥammad ﷺ. To casually instruct someone to “break it, dismantle it or paint over it” merely because the two names appear side by side requires serious evidence from the Sharīʿah. Where is the clear Qurʾānic text, authentic ḥadīth or recognised juristic principle establishing that displaying the name of Allāh alongside the name of His Messenger ﷺ is inherently prohibited?
More importantly, why won't he apply this reasoning consistently.
The Saudi flag itself contains the testimony:
لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا اللهُ مُحَمَّدٌ رَسُولُ اللهِ
“There is no deity worthy of worship except Allāh; Muḥammad is the Messenger of Allāh.”
The names Allāh and Muḥammad ﷺ appear together within the very Kalimah of Tawḥīd. Is the Saudi flag now to be “broken”, “dismantled” or painted over because the two names appear alongside one another? Of course not. The absurdity of the conclusion exposes the weakness of the reasoning.
No Muslim disputes that Allāh and His Messenger ﷺ are absolutely not equal in rank or status. Allāh is the Creator and Muḥammad ﷺ is His servant and Messenger. But physical proximity in writing does not establish theological equality. If simply placing the two names alongside one another constituted unlawful equivalence, one would have to explain what becomes of the Shahādah itself.
There may be legitimate discussions concerning particular forms of calligraphy, ornamentation, positioning, reverence for sacred names, or avoiding designs that could convey an incorrect meaning. That is a completely different matter from issuing a sweeping instruction to break or paint over something bearing the name of Allāh or His Rasūl.
Fatwā is not a playground for impulsive one-line answers. When speaking in the name of the Sharīʿah, especially before hundreds of thousands of people, evidence, precision and consistency matter. A ruling whose underlying logic collapses the moment it is applied to the Kalimah deserves to be challenged, not blindly circulated.
If anything deserves to be broken, dismantled or painted over, it is Assim al-Hakeem’s ridiculous argument — because clearly, al-Ḥakīm is not exactly his superpower.
At this rate, “Al-Ḥakīm” is doing some very heavy lifting. Perhaps ʿĀṣī al-Jāhil — would be a more fitting description of this guy.
🔴 Filistinli yetkili Talal Nassar, Suriye yönetimine ‘nasihat’ içeren mesaj gönderdi:
- Mısır, Ürdün ve Abbas’ın düştüğü hataya düşmeyin
- İsrail ile yapılacak anlaşmalar Filistin ve Suriye halkının cihadını sırtından bıçaklar
- Vallahi İsrail hiçbir anlaşmaya uymaz
- Çözüm yalnızca cihattır. Barış veya taviz değildir
SNEAKO Says He Was BRAINWASHED by Western Media and Had Major Misconceptions About the Taliban and Women’s Rights in Afghanistan😳🇦🇫
"I'm sure you guys have heard women can't go to school in Afghanistan. That's not true. They can actually attend Islamic schools (madrasas). They just don't want any Western influence. Just look at our women. They're totally vindicated for not wanting Western Judeo-Christian values imposed on the women they wanna protect and respect."