“This is how bullies act. They avoid interacting with people who might be an equal match and seek to belittle those who they think they can dominate”
https://t.co/E6hHwq7Kec
@FatherShaggy@Teachers__Unite@fordnation@Sflecce There is an expectation if more academic ability and independence in academic (university) level courses. Of course there is. The trouble is many people equate academic with elitism. Why should academic students be forced into learning that is below their ability?
@FatherShaggy@Teachers__Unite@fordnation@Sflecce All students should be supported in the most appropriate learning environment. The name for the academic stream is perhaps a misnomer and therefore seem as better. That is false. Well written and taught applied courses are equally suitable for anyone.
@FatherShaggy@Teachers__Unite@fordnation@Sflecce Your euphemism, not mine and not that of the majority of educators. And yes, some students require greater levels of support and reduced demand. This is not nee and not controversial. It is pragmatic and ethical for all. Destreaming does it equal equity, if that is the aim.
@FatherShaggy@Teachers__Unite@fordnation@Sflecce There are a lot of assumptions made in this arguement. 1. Applied level courses are inherently negative. 2. Academic level courses are an advantage for those in them. 3. Students will only follow teacher recommendations without parental consultation.
@FatherShaggy@Teachers__Unite@fordnation@Sflecce Perceived academic ability is an opinion. No one is forced into anything. Everyone is encouraged to make choices based on recommendations. I have made these very suggestions based on my expert opinion as a trained educator. If the student elects to ignore them, so be it.
@FatherShaggy@Teachers__Unite@fordnation@Sflecce So now everyone is negatively affected. Destreamed classes negatively impact those at both ends of the spectrum.
Applied level courses are not a punishment nor are they something to "affect" people.
@FatherShaggy@Teachers__Unite@fordnation@Sflecce Actually, that is a matter of opinion. It is true that students demonstrating higher academic achievement were streamed to academic, as differentiation best practices suggest, and those needing more direct support and less academic rigor, applied.
@FatherShaggy@Teachers__Unite@fordnation@Sflecce How was streaming not working? Those who wanted/need a more rigorous, academic challenge for it? Those who needed a greater hands-on and applied approach to curriculum got it. Each group was generally learning alongside peers with similar needs and desires. Now...?