@DrSarahCox A2 It can show if there was not enough data collected, or if there was too much data. This is very much a "just right" Goldie Locks situation #SCRDChat
@olivia_enders@davidmrehfeld @ssequinn A4 This question was tough for me but I think what you gave was helpful for my understanding (still not sure I got it entirely). Consistency seems to be the answer for most things! #SCRDChat
@davidmrehfeld A3 I dont know if this is right but the big thing that comes to mind is looking at the scale. You can look at two graphs side by side and see a trend but if they are not scaled the same that can be a huge issue. #SCRDChat
@davidmrehfeld A2 for the data to be convincing there needs to be a clear trend and baseline. Then it should also be easy to spot through replication #SCRDChat
@Psych_Core A4 combining those analytical techniques is a way to look over with a critical eye and double check your work. Any time you can review your data and double check it can improve the validity #SCRDChat
@Psych_Core A3 This is multiple baseline across multiple participants. This appears to show a demonstration of effect for all the participants with some variance in the data. Not an alarming amount. #SCRDChat
@Psych_Core A2 the benefit would be showing a greater effect size possibly. With changing criterion your student would show their understanding at those levels and that would show improvement from baseline #SCRDChat
@behavior_psych A4. The change rate depends on the study and the criterion. The researcher will determine when to change based on the criteria and when it is met. #SCRDChat
@behavior_psych A2. I dont feel confident I know enough about RADs...but I think those strategies are sufficient. You could also set additional criteria (which I would need to read about by a classmate of mine mentioned) #SCRDChat
@behavior_psych A1: It can be so hard to set the criterion, and this can hold students back. Corey gave the throwing darts in the dark metaphor and that really can be what it feels like. That would depend on the specific study, but still can be such a hurtle! #SCRDChat
@drduek A5. This does not feel like a typical educational setting, but sometimes its helpful to do something a little atypical to make the research and understanding clear! Its a short term disruption for a long term result and understanding!
@drduek A4. Random assignment is a great option. Although I would admit it sounds really over whelming for me and it could be problematic. Likely a better choice for an experiences researcher.
@gypsypineapple @drduek A: I agree! I think it needs to be looked at about what might be causing the preference. What tweaks could help create that preference for the other treatment? #SCRDChat
@drduek A2: This would be based on the specific research. If it was an academic task a different colored paper or pen would be an easy solution! #SCRDChat