MSK:)

When the gods left with smoke and ashes / Who do you think was there? / Six fingered dealers eager to show all their wares

[MSK:) @MskDom]

Great presentation by Landgrebe & Smith on AI limitations and looming AI-Bubble burst: https://t.co/3MLWziASRc

[Ivor Cummins @FatEmperor]

Did you know this?

Do most people not know ANYTHING about the globalist's climate project?

Fascinating tip of the fraudulent iceberg:

[Electroverse @Electroversenet]

In 2016, the Netherlands Meteorological Institute adjusted temperatures at De Bilt, the country's main climate station. Daily maximums from 1901 to 1950 were lowered by up to 1.9C, which removed 16 of 23 heatwaves from the record.

The altered data were then used to claim modern heatwaves were unprecedented.

Four researchers challenged the changes, but the institute dismissed the criticism, so the analysis went to peer review. In 2021, it was published, conclusively demonstrating the method systematically erased historical heat extremes.

Today, the Meteorological Institute has quietly changed its approach, and as a result, seven erased heatwaves have been restored, including the extreme summer of 1947.

Here again, we have a government agency caught rewriting climate history. The Netherlands Meteorological Institute erased heatwaves of the past, ignored critics, and reinstated the truth only when the evidence became impossible to ignore.

Policies were built on that manipulated record.
Dutch farmers lost livelihoods.
Industry and the wider economy paid the price.

But accountability is coming.

[Maik Pittel @maikpi70]

gut zuhören😎

[DD Geopolitics @DD_Geopolitics]

🇩🇪 Former German Chancellor Scholz, who spent three years on his knees for Washington while Germany deindustrialized, is still on his knees apparently.

He quoted NATO's first Secretary General Lord Ismay's famous line:

"NATO was founded to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down."

Then added: "There is sense in this."

[Daniel Davis Deep Dive @DanielLDavis1]

Russian Ambassador: It might already be "too late" to avert a Russian missile strike into Europe. @Dpol_un
This morning on our Deep Dive show, I interviewed Russia's ambassador to the OSCE in Vienna and asked him point-blank whether Russia would strike *European* targets and expand the war.  I expected a diplomatically diffused answer from which I would have to read between the lines.  Instead, I he was about as direct as any diplomat I've ever heard:

It might already be "too late" to avert a Russian direct strike against European targets.

Ukrainian long range drone and missile strikes have been increasingly accurate and effective on hitting energy, civilian, and military targets deep inside Russia, with the latest at Ryazan overnight. Mr. Polyansky argues that these strikes are only possible with Western military expertise, technology, and intelligence.

Additionally, Russia has been warning for weeks now that Ukrainian drone attacks had been using Baltic airspace to hit targets in Russia's northern regions, in Mr. Polyansky's view, directly involving European states in the fight directly against Russia.

This reportedly crossed redlines in Moscow that other Russian voices claim has led them to decide to take action against military factories in the West, even risking an Article 5 trigger. Influential Russian analysts, such as Sergey Karaganov and Alexander Sladkov have been outspoken in recent days that conventional missile strikes against Europe should be closely followed by even nuclear strikes if the missiles don't "deter Europe."

Its one thing if its a former official or media personality in Russia, but when a sitting diplomat uses nearly the same language to convey that Moscow is considering a major escalation, we should pay a lot of attention.

The West was rightfully concerned about escalation in the war's opening rounds in 2022, but after incrimental escalation into the conflict by introducing one new weapon system after another did not spawn a Russian response beyond the Ukraine border, it appears Western leaders finally concluded Russia never will respond, and there aren't any genuine red lines.

God help us if such confidence proves to be unfounded.

[Roman Empire @RomanEmpire1993]

Santos Bonacci: Nobilities Of The Old World & The Jesuits

[MAZE @mazemoore]

2016. Guy McPherson (a climate change expert, scientist, and professor from the University of Arizona) says that there will not be any humans on the planet by 2026 due to the effects of climate change.

Trust the scientists. 😜🤣

[Ivor Cummins @FatEmperor]

Professor William Happer explains ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW....about CO2 and Climate Change.

I promise you as an engineer and logistician.

I promise you - this is ALL you need to know:

[Geopolitics & Empire @Geopolitics_Emp]

"Investors...are basically promoting [AI] hype for a different reason. They're promoting this hype to create a total network of digitization and AI over the planet for surveillance and control. And for this, AI works really well." Jobst Landgrebe, Author of "The Hype Cycle: Uppers and Downers in Our Bipolar Culture" 🛂

🔗 https://t.co/874FCenMv9

[marc friedrich @marcfriedrich]

Henryk M. Broder zelegt Aussage zur Wissenschaft

[Richard @ricwe123]

Remember that UN Security Council meeting where French journalist Adrien Bocquet was revealing how Ukraine staged the Bucha massacre?

Of course you don’t, because Western media buries anything that doesn’t fit their carefully manufactured narrative......

[James Li @5149jamesli]

$852 billion dollar company 😵‍💫

[Julian Mellentin @JulianMellentin]

Beyond Meat just released its 2025 results.
1. It has never made a profit.
2. Each $1 of product it sold in 2025 cost it $1.95 to make.
3. That’s a dramatic change since 2024, when each $1 of product it sold cost $1.32 to make.
4. It has $1.2 billion of accumulated losses on its balance sheet.

It takes quite a talent to achieve such results!

Meantime, in 2025 demand for fresh beef in the US was up 9.9% by volume sold, to $45 billion. That growth is despite a 10% price increase.

It turns out that real humans prefer real food. Learning about that well-known reality is a long and painful road for the investors and plant-based zealots.

Alt Proteins continues its long march to one of the biggest failures in the history of food.

[Richard @ricwe123]

Here we have that particular moment when retired US diplomat, Robert Ford,openly admitted that he and British MI6 helped rebranding former Al Queda headchopper now Syrian President Al Sharaa.

Like it was some kind of PR campaign.....

[zerohedge @zerohedge]

Net Zero Activists Stumped By Shock New Evidence Showing No Link Between CO2 & Temperature Over Last Three Million Years https://t.co/PLZb686seB

[Sense Receptor @SenseReceptor]

🔥MIND-BLOWING REVELATION🔥 Please stop and think about the implications of what's explained here. (1/3)

THIS is why it's IMPOSSIBLE to "vaccinate" against anything.

THIS is why "vaccines" are the PERFECT POISONS.

THIS is why eugenicists like Bill Gates love "vaccines."

Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for James Delingpole (@JMCDelingpole) how "vaccines," essentially, work in the exact opposite way as we're told they do—meaning it's literally impossible to make a vaccine that does anything but poison somebody.

While we're told that "vaccines" work by giving us a small amount of a toxic substance—e.g. a bacteria or virus— in turn allowing us to create immunity against future infections, what the injections actually do is make us vulnerable to said toxins. Furthermore, "vaccines" prime our bodies to react badly to *anything* that's injected into us, including benign substances like milk or egg proteins. Hence the proliferation of allergies, such as allergies to milk, eggs, wheat, peanuts, etc.

Incredibly, Latypova explains how this has been known since 1913, when Charles Richet—a French physiologist and self-proclaimed eugenicist—won a Nobel Prize for figuring out that injecting animals with toxins primes them for harmful or deadly reactions if they encounter the same toxins in the environment, even in small amounts. He called these reactions "anaphylactic" reactions, but said that these reactions also included allergies.

After researching this topic and analyzing Richet's work, Latypova says she's come to the conclusion that "everybody who is...closely familiar with this history and work cannot think that it's possible to vaccinate." The pharma insider adds, "It's impossible to vaccinate for anything. And Richet has demonstrated it conclusively and was given Nobel Prize for it...because he figured out how to poison everyone by sensitizing them to the most commonly occurring things in their environment."

"It's the most ingenious way of poisoning," Latypova says.

"The eugenicists never went away. They all still think that way. They all still think that they should poison us and limit our reproduction because, you know, we're polluting the earth now. We're causing climate change," Latypova adds. "They're brainwashing themselves and their followers into thinking that this is actually acceptable. It's acceptable to poison people. It's acceptable to sterilize people. It's acceptable to lie to people because it's for the greater good. So what started with Richet continues today."

Partial transcription of clip:

"One of the historical examples, Katherine [Watt] and I
ran into, and and this became a huge, epiphany for me is, Charles Richet, who was a French researcher in that in that time. So he worked in early 1900s. In 1913, he was given Nobel Prize for this work, and he is credited with the work on anaphylaxis, although he wasn't the only one, but so he received the Nobel Prize. And so that that to me, you know, opened so much kind of I was like, of course. You know, why didn't I see this before? But, basically, you know, when you look at this work and then when you look what preceded and what went after,
you kind of understand a few things.

"First of all, everybody who is, let's say, closely familiar with this history and work cannot think that it's possible to vaccinate. It's impossible to vaccinate for anything.
And Richet has demonstrated it conclusively and was given Nobel Prize for it...because he figured out how to
poison everyone by sensitizing them to the most commonly occurring things in their environment. It's the most ingenious way of poisoning.

"He was a committed eugenicist. And at that time, you
know, everyone should realize, eugenicism was a fashionable society attitude. So, you know, all the well-to-do classes were subscribing to it. The web the the good breeding was always, you know, promoted. And, at the time, the sentiment was, well, how can we help the poor being less dirty and less numerous? Make them less humorous. And AKA kill them. Because this side of them is so offensive to us when we ride our horses through the park and, you know, and then there's like them. What can we do about it? And what can we do about it became into let's figure out how to control
their, overbreeding because they tend to reproduce
reproduce too much, and they tend to live in crowded conditions, and they tend to have poor hygiene and no sanitation.

"So instead of working on those issues, they will decide, oh, let's vaccinate them. And, actually, the same same thing continues with Bill Gates in Africa and India for the same reason. And, you know, but but all of these
thoughts extended now to us, to normal people.

"Now all of the globalist and this, you know, elites, I don't call them elites, but they all think of us that way. That's, you know, that's what people need to understand. The eugenicists never went away. They all still think that way. They all still think that they should poison us and and limit our reproduction because,
you know, we're polluting the earth now. We're causing the climate change. Whatever those ideas are, but they're brainwashing themselves and their followers into thinking that this is actually acceptable.
It's acceptable to poison people. It's acceptable to sterilize people. It's acceptable to lie to people,
because it's for the greater good. You know? So what what started with Richet continues today."

[Furkan Gözükara @FurkanGozukara]

Absolute bombshell. Glenn Greenwald reveals that in 36 US states you cannot get a government contract unless you sign a pledge promising never to boycott Israel. You can boycott American states or any other country but criticizing Israel is strictly forbidden.

[Gabriel @GabeZZOZZ]

Still can't believe Ursula said this 4 years ago and today Russia has its own satellite internet network

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

In 2015, George Soros and WEF 'Young Global Leader' Chrystia Freeland—who now serves as an unpaid economic adviser to Zelensky—openly admitted that Ukraine's leadership was bought and paid for by George Soros.