@baskryptic@CryptoCrewU Stop being greedy and waiting for one last pump. I've been following @CryptoCrewU for 6 years and he's never missed a beat. Do you really expect a 'sell now' tweet, it's about managing risk as Steve would say. If you are at +500% just maybe you should think about selling some!?
@CryptoCrewU Hi Steve, I haven't had a weekly report since I signed up for the Bitcoin Bottom Blueprint early access. Has this overriden something? Do I need to re-register?
We’ve been seeing more and more players in the payments and stablecoins space launch their own blockchains. To me, that’s a clear sign the market sees blockchain as core financial infrastructure — something we’ve believed in and have been building toward on the XRP Ledger for over 13 years.
Launching a blockchain is hard. Building an ecosystem with developers, liquidity, trust, and real-world usage is even harder. The XRPL has real traction and institutional adoption because it’s been battle-tested, updated, and improved upon for well over a decade.
Some blockchains are built with permissioned validator sets controlled by one entity or a small group. This can provide control and compliance for specific, closed-network scenarios, but it limits reach, resilience, and the ability for anyone to contribute to securing and growing the network. Decentralization vs. centralization is constantly debated and there’s not a single answer that fits every use case for crypto and the concepts themselves have changed in definition over the years.
As many of you know, the XRPL is public and permissionless at its core, with optional permissioned features for regulated use cases. This open foundation makes it adaptable, interoperable, and well-positioned to serve as critical infrastructure for the world’s financial system — connecting assets, markets, and participants seamlessly across borders.
The XRPL was built so fees stay low and predictable, just fractions of a cent, without a separate gas token. You can pay directly in XRP for any issued asset, avoiding the friction and hidden costs of buying another token just to transact. XRP is counterparty-free, accessible by all, and used as a bridge asset with real utility for payments, settlement, and liquidity. (Every transaction on the XRPL uses/burns XRP.)
It’s encouraging to see some newer chains adopt design choices that have long been part of the XRPL’s architecture, like deterministic finality and Proof of Authority-based consensus mechanisms. It shows there’s growing alignment in the industry on the importance of predictable, reliable settlement for financial applications without expensive validation.
Looking forward to the next phase of XRPL innovations, bringing more programmability, compliance-grade capabilities, and deeper liquidity for institutional use.
And to those just getting started… Welcome to the party! The crypto tent is only getting bigger.
@hodlthesmartway@dotkrueger I do too. Got stung by BTC and ETH fees once, not to mention it takes an age to transfer. I've used XRP ever since - low fees and fast, exactly what it was created for.
This is it – the moment we’ve been waiting for. The SEC will drop its appeal – a resounding victory for Ripple, for crypto, every way you look at it.
The future is bright. Let's build.
If you are an XRP holder, please be kind to the BTC guys!
BTC was founded on the libertarian ideal of self-custody, immunity from deflation, control, and other shenanigans (which is why I was drawn to it). So, the last few years of big-money control, and now government/political involvement! If you are intellectually honest, it's incompatible with the whole ideal that BTC represents - and that is hard to come to terms with.
XRP, on the other hand, has always been about integration into the mainstream economic system. So, no soul-searching has been necessary.
@r0bertclarkson@bgarlinghouse Aye, too much maxi rhetoric unfortunately! There's no need to beat down innovation and other projects that are targeting different use cases to BTC. Especially with old FUD narratives that only have partial truths. As Brad said, the industry should be banding together.
@r0bertclarkson@bgarlinghouse At the request of Ripple, as I already stated.
You've diverted from the original point. Just because a node chooses what trust lines to issue, as all nodes on the XRPL do, it does not make XRP a centralised shitcoin as per your original post.
@r0bertclarkson@bgarlinghouse Ripple didn't freeze it, that's the point! The exchange removed a trust line to prevent IOUs from being issued because 'they' (the exchange) didn't trust the wallet. There was nothing stopping him finding a different off ramp to fiat as far as I'm aware
@r0bertclarkson@bgarlinghouse An off ramp to fiat was frozen... that's nothing like what you were hinting at.
Admittedly that was a phrase I came up with but as he was not legally allowed to sell his holdings on mass due to contractual obligations, what would you call it?
@r0bertclarkson@bgarlinghouse Fake news, Ripple did no such thing. Bitstamp responded to a request from Ripple to prevent an illegal liquidation of XRP into fiat through their exchange. Every node in the XRPL is in control of their own trust lines and who they are willing to accept IOUs from.