Another Karmelo Anthony.
This 17 year old murdered a store worker because he wouldn’t sell him tobacco,
Public executions for these little George Floyds.
The brother Mubeen Raza has brought an out of context clip of Mawlana Ilyās sb, where he supposedly says that Allah is everywhere in his Dhat.
The reality is that the clip has been taken heavily out of context. It is clear to anyone who listens to the full dars, that this is referring to the Ma'iyyah of Allah while still referring that Allah is free from a Makan. So Allah's being "everywhere" is one of Ma'iyyah and Qurb, as he clarifies in this recent video of his: https://t.co/uStOHoiG3u
Now that we understand the full context that this Barelwī removed, what is the ruling on saying this?
Muftī Riḍāʾ al-Ḥaqq sb writes,
If the speaker, by affirming place for Allāh Taʿālā, intends that Allāh Taʿālā is present in every place, and that His existence has no “how” - i.e., in every place without modality, without occupying a place, and His reality being unknown; rather, it is among the mutashābihāt - then this belief is correct and sound. Its interpretation is the maʿiyyah without modality, in consideration of His manifestation; some of the Ṣūfiyyah have chosen this view. And we shall mention its sources in the answer to the second question.
But if he intends that Allāh Taʿālā is in every place, and its modality is known, then this creed is corrupt without doubt.
╾ Al-ʿAṣīdatu-s-Samāwiyyah (1/604-605) ╼
The first belief being described is not describing Allah to be in a Makān, rather it is affirming transcendance for Allah above Makān by saying He is everywhere, just like we say time does not apply to Allah, so we say He existed in every time, and this is correct; Or it is affirming that Allah is everywhere with his knowledge (or any other suitable interpretation) instead of literally being everywhere with his Dhāt, which will be explained in the next scan. And this is what Mawlāna Ilyās sb was saying.
Now, will this Barelwī criticise ʾImām al-Kawtharī for saying the same thing as Mawlāna Ilyās sb?
Muftī Riḍāʾ al-Ḥaqq sb writes,
Al-ʿAllāmah Zāhid al-Kawtharī (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
“As for the statement of one who says that He, exalted is He, is in every place - when considered in light of the author’s transmission, its outward sense is a statement of anthropomorphism, just like the statement of one who says that He is in one place and not in another, unless what is meant is to declare Him transcendent, exalted is He, above dwelling in place or time."
(Ḥāshiyat al-Kawtharī ʿalā al-Ikhtilāf fī al-Lafẓ wa-l-Radd ʿalā al-Jahmiyyah wa-l-Mushabbihah, Ibn Qutaybah, p. 28)
╾ Al-ʿAṣīdatu-s-Samāwiyyah (1/605-606) ╼
We therefore conclude that the brother has unfortunately slandered Mawlāna Ilyās sb, and we call on him to retract this, after it has been clarified exactly what he meant by he himself, and proven from Ahl al-Sunnah.
@LionsOfZion_ORG I pray Allah humiliates you. Everyone hates you and all the fear you currently feel is nothing compared to what awaits you in the afterlife
As-Salāmu ʿAlaykum, I need financial support for my medication.
I need to raise $500 between today and tomorrow for my pain prescriptions, please help.
BuyMeACoffee:
https://t.co/fdl9UnETQH
PayPal:
https://t.co/PUKVfk9dHR
Fake and misleading news from the forces of darkness, repeated by useful idiots, to prepare the ground for the mass slaughter of Iranian citizens by the Trump and Netanyahu regimes.
Never forget the 168 elementary school girls murdered by Trump in Minab city.