π¨π¨ Interested in β¬οΈ mechanical properties of tendons? π¨π¨
Please see below for a π§΅ on why strain magnitude is an important factor
based off my recent review https://t.co/3FBvh2TwAx
Proud to be invited to the legendary Narodne Sportove Centrum in Bratislava next month to talk about muscle activation and its role in training, performance & adaptation. Hope to see some of you there πͺβ‘οΈπ§
@BradSchoenfeld My phd student has just finished a very interesting study in well trained lifters that will add valuable perspective to this.
But yes, I dont think theres anything inherently special about RIs for hypertrophy other than they permit higher volumes per set.
@JeffNippard tries a 30-day hypertrophy program training arms every day πͺ
Will this contribute to the science .... or is it social media entertainment? π
@AlexViKu they arent even trained on the descending limb at all (i.e. little/ no stretch). Then there's multiple studies in quads that show increasing the ROM to even longer lengths (i.e. further descending vs mid descending) doesnt β¬οΈ growth
π₯π₯Chest Hypertrophy Tip π₯π₯
Load up heavy in the mid-range. Huge torque profile due to length-tension r'ship and mechanical advantage overlap (and bit of passive tension in there also).
#hypertrophy
@AlexViKu shortened variation isnt a relevant argument to this either. Also, the calves operate on the ascending limb & Herzog, Maganris & Bizet studies show theres minimal growth due to mostly small amounts of passive tension. so while the calves are best trained in dorsiflexion 2/
@AlexViKu theyre on the descending limb as I show. Probably the biggest misconception in understanding partials is thinking that you need to take a joint/ muscle to its maximal excursion. That doesn't optimise growth at all
@AlexViKu growth is dictated by disturbing mechanosensetive receptors in the cell which achieved through active force and passive tension. the ROMs used in research doesnt support extreme stretching of muscles which reduces active tension. The pecs are 'stretched' in this video as 1/
A lot to get through in part 3 β apologies itβs a long one!
Stiffness & RFD, research limitations, representative 'sprinters' in research?.. and where does the increase in stiffness come from?
πββοΈβοΈπͺ
@LinkedInHelp Can I have a link to your legal and GDPR obligations with handling such data? And how long does your 3rd party partner retain my data and what do they use it for?
Hey @LinkedIn
Why are you trying to coerce me to provide you with a government ID and facial picture to access my account? Ive 2 factor authentication in place yet you've frozen me out and forcing me to comply to access my account. Unfreeze this immediately please
@LinkedInHelp You are still trying to coerce me into giving you a government ID document. I have 2 step verification on and want to use it for account security purposes, so this is not 'crucial'. Are you telling me you're permanently suspending me unless I provide you with a government ID?
Hey @LinkedIn
Why are you trying to coerce me to provide you with a government ID and facial picture to access my account? Ive 2 factor authentication in place yet you've frozen me out and forcing me to comply to access my account. Unfreeze this immediately please
Does a compliant tendon store β¬οΈ energy than a stiffer one? Apparently the S&C profession are getting it wrong by β¬οΈ tendon stiffness. Also, apparently compliance leads to quasi-iso contractions
So who actually knows about how tendons store energy & how the MTC functions in πββοΈ?
"Sprinters have the same tendon stiffness or are more compliant than untrained controls?"
Sure - if you cherry-pick weak data and misunderstand tendon biomechanics
The usual awful stuff from Chris Beardsley here.
So this is Part 1 of a 3-part video @lahti_johan@GregLehman