@WomenAreFedUp@Telegraph the Constitution is narrowly limited to levying war against the United States or adhering to its enemies by giving them aid and comfort—proven by two witnesses to an overt act. Disagreeing with open-ended funding or seeking a deal is not that.
@WomenAreFedUp@Telegraph that would require American forces to fight. Russia violated it; the U.S. never promised to go to war.
Calling policy differences over Ukraine aid, negotiations, or ending a costly stalemate “working with our enemy” and “treason” is pure hyperbole. Treason under ...
@WomenAreFedUp@Telegraph No. The Budapest Memorandum (1994) gave Ukraine security assurances—respect for borders, no threat/use of force, and seeking UN Security Council help in case of nuclear aggression—not a NATO-style military defense pledge. U.S. negotiators explicitly rejected “guarantees”...
@DobbyElfofre3@SrLiberal@JordiWild Eso es una reverenda tontería. Eso le da el poder a cualquier candidato a, mediante su negativa a participar, controlar la publicación de las entrevistas de los otros candidatos.