Caleb Crow

Chances to clarify in advance what would falsify your beliefs are too precious to waste by merely considering if you can still tolerate the amount you were off.

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@CharlesAryieh @thevivafrei @DrEliDavid Do you think that some people are better at discerning who will and won't abuse that trust or do you think that no one can more reliably than not predict that because anyone can turn at any point? Or do you mean there's a part that is discernable and a part that is indiscernible?

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@CharlesAryieh @thevivafrei @DrEliDavid Was he also absolutely correct when he said to always trust Trump?

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@StarFox_360 @TRHLofficial How could that claim be falsified?

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@thevivafrei If you have this conversation with her keep in mind there is a nonzero chance she's a psyop or construct. The way that can be simultaneously determined and disarmed if so is searching thoroughly and carefully in advance for exactly one question that is the right one to ask first.

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@mcrs987 @xdNiBoR In what scenario would that vantage point exist?

Do what it looks like from the point of view of a realistic scenario.

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@KenKirtland17 The graph should do one pixel per number of satellites that fill the area of one pixel.

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@mcrs987 Do a version where you make one pixel represent the number of satellites that it would take to fill a whole pixel.

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@DPJHodges Are you saying that you don't think you can comment without your response creating further division, hatred, or tension? Or do you mean that this is your only thought on it and you see no contribution to the other part of those wishes about making change and have none to suggest?

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@AnManOnline Do not let them evade Socratic examination for free. Blanket ostracisation from society is too ambiguous. Rather have this as the one and only way the rest of society will interact with them until they've sufficiently damaged all of the tyrants and ideologies each may be serving.

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@capeandcowell Brits should be socratically examining the hive mind as a special purpose opposing hive mind and posting the results. I don't know why people resort to destroying property when they already have the means to deploy tyrant and liar seeking psychological missiles and livestream it.

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@C_3C_3 This is the psychological parasitization by a hive mind which can be agitated into self destruction by a rival hive mind where in this case each member can retain their individual personality and autonomy. It must be openly stated as falsifiable in each case by Socratic dialogue.

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@C_3C_3 Their goal is inciting enough to respond with violence. The way to defeat it is force the tyrants to escalate the violence and show its face in as ugly a way as possible and ensure that is streamed. It's also to find what Socratic questions hit nerves and mob ask them everywhere.

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@FahAunty @RupertLowe10 What did you understand this bit to be about and how do you characterize what happened and why it did? Do you think discussion of this issue would be better or worse if people led by example in interacting Mutually Socratically with all who were willing to also interact that way?

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@painterinoil @MikeJohnson I don't answer questions that begin like "Don't you realize" whether or not I agree with the assumed premise. I will answer questions that are directly phrased.

Is the cause of what you are saying is the case mostly to do with a lesser of two evils trap or is it a deeper reason?

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@SallyMayweather Neither the second amendment nor watering the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants is about supporting a revolution to overthrow the federal government.

It is about a defensive option to both drive up the costs of those measures and to force a full reveal of that ugly face.

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@jacktronprime @TRHLofficial This by itself can be consistent with being controlled by another. A way that is definitively inconsistent is to confidently state what he will do or give an ultimatum that Israel has some way of knowing he won't back down from. This sounds like bargaining with the one in charge.

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@freedomfromlib @Tech4hireonline @elonmusk You are moving goalposts when a premise for an initial point to support your ultimate conclusion is revealed not to be a valid basis and you don't first acknowledge that by itself and then separately see if the point can stand alone when framed anew and earn the same interaction.

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@LightTemple @GadSaad You say don't call for more violence and instead call for law and so forth. What is to keep people from breaking the law?

[Caleb Crow @MusingTiger]

@Orangeman5175 @elonmusk What is the same thing that you think we are basically asking?