@PMOIndia@narendramodi आदरणीय प्रधानमंत्री जी,आपकी मदद चाहिए।मैं मुस्कान MALAYSIA से JEE परीक्षार्थी हूँ।Covid में बंद border के कारण Singapore जाकर परीक्षा देना असंभव है।काफ़ी परीक्षार्थी हैं। MALAYSIA को Singapore SUB-CENTRE घोषित कर दें।“मन की बात” सुनकर लिखने की प्रेरणा मिली
Even at the height of Mumbai underworld, there was an unwritten rule - You do not kill a police personnel, and you don't touch families.
And this chomu is openly threatening the police personnel. He seems to have forgotten his aukaat.
When your main voter base is productive people who just want a competent leadership that can quietly run the country in the background; you should trust those productive people to vote you back to power, and deal with subversive elements with an iron fist.
Ależ piękny real-time marketing! 🥹
Wczoraj Argentyna wyprowadziła mecz z 0:2 na 3:2, a na zdjęciach jej trener - Lionel Scaloni.
Po meczu zalał się łzami i przeprosił, że nie jest w stanie udzielać wywiadu, na co Garmin zareagował zdjęciami z podpisem:
[1] „Nie musisz nic mówić”
[2] „Twoje tętno powiedziało już wszystko”
Topji said literally the same thing on Bpillers
Want 24 hrs power but opposes dams, solar parks & power plants
Doesn’t want mining to be done but asks about rare earth minerals
Asks about AI but opposes data centres and semiconductor plants
All infinites are not the same. This seems deeply unintuitive and even disturbing.
There are infinities that are countable. You can list them. While some infinities are uncountable, you cannot list them, even in principle.
There are more real numbers between 0 and 1, than there are natural numbers.
You see, natural numbers are countably infinite. They are infinite, but they are listable. 1,2,3,4,5 ….
Even though the list never ends, every item has a definite place in the list.
Now consider all real numbers between 0 and 1 (0.1, 0.00003, 0.05, …..etc. )
There are so many real numbers in that tiny interval that they cannot be listed completely. No possible list can contain all of them, even in principle.
So this set is uncountably infinite.
Its cardinality is larger than the cardinality of the natural numbers.
So an infinity in a bounded interval is “larger” than the infinity in an open interval. I find this deeply bothersome.
Most Indians believe that the person they name as nominee on their bank account will get that money when they die. That belief is wrong, and it has torn families apart.
Here is what the law actually says.
Under Indian law, a nominee is not the owner of your money. A nominee is only a trustee. That means the bank will hand the balance to the nominee after your death, but the nominee is legally required to pass it on to your legal heirs, the people entitled to inherit under succession law. Receiving the money and owning the money are two different things.
This is not a small technical point. It is settled law. The Supreme Court laid it down decades ago and reaffirmed it firmly in a judgment in 2023.
A nomination, the court said, is simply a convenience. It gives the bank a single safe person to release the funds to, so the bank is not caught between fighting relatives. It was never meant to decide who finally owns the money.
The same rule applies almost everywhere. Bank accounts, fixed deposits, shares, mutual funds and provident fund. In all of them, the nominee holds the money in trust for the legal heirs.
There is one real exception. In life insurance, the law allows certain close family nominees, a spouse, parents or children, to keep the proceeds, though even here the High Courts have not fully agreed.
There is one more thing you must know because false claims about it are spreading online. In November 2025, the rules changed to let you name up to four nominees on a bank account instead of one.
Many social media posts claimed this finally lets you pass your money directly to whoever you choose. That is not true. You can now name four nominees instead of one, but all of them still receive the money as trustees for your legal heirs. The doctrine did not change. Only the number did.
So what actually protects your family? One thing above all, a valid Will. A Will overrides a nomination. If you want a specific person to truly own what you leave behind, name them in a properly made Will, not just on a nomination form.
Nomination decides who collects your money. A Will decides who keeps it. Most families learn the difference at the worst possible time.
Follow for verified stories every Indian deserves to know.
Never underestimate the impact you can have in someone’s life
A random fan woke up one morning to go support his favorite driver who hadn’t been himself lately . He simply shouted out amongst the crowd:
“Lewis, remember who you are mate.
You’ve done it before. You’ll do it again.”
& that was all your favorite driver needed to hear. He thought about that comment all week. He wins the race. He dedicates his celebratory post to what you said.
You’re the reason your favorite driver got his spark back. Incredible
BREAKING: Iran says the US has agreed to pay $300 billion in reconstruction funds directly to Iran as part of the deal Pakistan announced, alongside the release of $24 billion in frozen funds with $12 billion released before negotiations even start, per Mehr News.
This directly contradicts Trump's & Vance's claim that no funds will be transferred to Iran at all.
If Trump denies this is true, there never was a deal. If Trump confirms, the US has fully capitulated to Iran's demands.
not to get real on you but if you ever think you can't change anything on your own (in regards to whatever); that one singular fan yelling "remember who you are" to one of the greatest athletes of our time genuinely woke him up from all that self doubt and anxiety 🥲
So, Prime Video made a series inspired by Ranga and Billa the infamous killers and kidnappers called Raakh. In this series the chief investigator played by Ali Fazal is shown as a Dalit whose father is a retired hawaldar who faced caste discrimination. Ali Fazal's character keeps photos of Ambedkar and Phule in his house. His main assistant officer is a Muslim but the lazy hawaldar is a Brahmin and the honest journalist is a Muslim woman.
But in the real life case the chief investigator was VP Gupta his assistant was Ram Chander and the Police Commissioner was JN Chaturvedi.
I have nothing against showing caste oppression through cinema but my problem is with propaganda. Prime Video India is a serial offender in this regard..they often make such series and completely twist real life characters. I have no issue with Dalit or Muslim police officers but why show an unnecessary oppression angle when it's not required especially in a series based on true events?