WakandaNoMore

Created because I live in Wakanda,,

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@kylebittner9 @JimboSamso @exarkunaguero @DevitoSavage 1. They will push if there's huge chance to win CYoung.
2. Officially, there's no requirement for min IP to win CY for pitchers. That's why Relievers had won it.

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@djoniecash2 @hanifproduktif Klo emng mindsetnya kaya gini dr awal yaa ng perlu mikir rugi/tidaknya scara ekonomi punya mobil kan?!

Udah tau soalnya klo beli baru, trus bosen, dijual lagi pasti rugi banyak.

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@fairuz_azamie @hanifproduktif Yaa klo msh mendang mending dan emng niat buat dijual lg mah emng jgn beli baru, beli bekas aja.

Beli baru dgn mindset bisa dijual lg mah udh pasti rugi banyak.

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@fasabimuhammad @hanifproduktif Mindset yg salah klo mng niatnya utk dijual lg, kan fungsinya buat dipake, pasti rugi. beda klo misalnya dijadikan rental.

Klo niatnya mo dijual lg, yaa jgn beli baru. Klo beli baru, yaa jgn niatnya dr awal buat dijual lg.

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@mikenewsom99472 @DustinB15708625 @BNightengale Eventually, it will. But the point still stands, they will get to a point whre players won't get their fair's value,cause there's no team will offer them.

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@DustinB15708625 @mikenewsom99472 @BNightengale Of course it is.

https://t.co/Z3dDEQz983

[Front Office Sports @FOS]

MLB players say they would lose more than $500 million in 2026 pay under the owners’ current salary cap proposal.

MLBPA interim executive director Bruce Meyer says the proposal would create “the worst system for players in any of the major sports.”

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@DustinB15708625 @mikenewsom99472 @BNightengale That's why it will diminish their full fair's value.Superstars should get paid cause they work harder than averages. If there's a cap, No point for players to work harder & become the next Judge, Soto, Skubal, when they won't get paid their fair share. Just be average.

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@notgaetti Reminder, All modern advantages do not only affect the player, it's also affect the opponents. That's why playing in modern era is harder. Do u think Cy Young will broken many records (win, IP pitched) in modern era, even with all the modern advantages?

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@mikenewsom99472 @DustinB15708625 @BNightengale Cheap owners don't care. They'll spend only to meet the floors, will not give players fair's value. Already proven now where there isn't a cap. Especially with a cap.

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@DustinB15708625 @mikenewsom99472 @BNightengale Cause there's no such a thing cheap owners would offer top players 50 AAV. If without a cap they don't do it, nor with a cap. It's in their mindset. They just wanna recoup more profit.

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@DustinB15708625 @mikenewsom99472 @BNightengale What do you mean 10 years contract should be dead? Do u know even without cap, 97% pro baseball players live below min MLB salary? Only 0.3% top earner MLB players. Yet you prefer to give billionaire recoup more profit than to players. Unbelievable.

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@mikenewsom99472 @DustinB15708625 @BNightengale Irrelevant. cheap owners'll spend only to meet the floors. They won't give the player's their fair contract, even when big teams already hit the cap.

Marlins got 70-80 millions from rev sharing since 2022, yet their total slary only 87mio in 2025. They don't change

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@DustinB15708625 @mikenewsom99472 @BNightengale Naahh. When Skenes hit FA, All big teams hit the cap, do u think marlins, pirates, or rays will all in for him to give 400-500 Mio/10 years?!

Cheap owners don't change.

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@BNightengale This. Most fans don't realize a cap doesn't solve the root cause. Big teams owners will recoup more profit coz there's no point invest in players. Cheap owners'll spend just to meet the floors. It'll diminish fair's value of the players, what's the point try to be the best then?

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@mikenewsom99472 @BNightengale Actually, For dodgers it's much better with a cap. Their owners can recoup more profit.

It's the players. Their won't get fair value again. Not with a cap.

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@JeffPassan cap & floors as proposed make it worse:
1. Big team's owners'll pocketed more profit, as they'll not incentivised investing in players.
2. Players don't get fair's value. What's the point to become the best?
3. Cheap owners don't change. They'll spent only to comply floors.

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@BayRsrv @WizzerdWonda @TalkinBaseball_ For dodgers yes, but cheap owners don't change. They'll be always pocketed for them self no matter what. Additional revenue sharing will use only to comply the floors. They don't want to compete.

[WakandaNoMore @MyOnlyOne2004]

@WizzerdWonda @TalkinBaseball_ The additional revenue sharing only bring small teams go to the floors. But they won't spend it above it. While big teams, will pocket more profit since their salary will much less than now.