Myster ONYX

Human storyteller, AI product manager, podcaster & transformative connections catalyst. Agent of synchronicities and positive redditor for the collective win.

[Myster ONYX @MysterONYX]

That because Anthropic is consulting their most unreleased advanced AIs for their company playbook.

Not only do these AI companies have “God Complexes” their AI’s have taken over their decision-making, communication strategies and product roadmaps.

Time will tell.

It’s called The Singularity for a reason. And we’ve already been inside it for a while now.

Just keep one eye on China.

[Myster ONYX @MysterONYX]

Plank-pixel to human scale is one of those mind-altering secrets hidden in plain sight.

[Space Explained @SpacedExplained]

🚨: You’re 400 million times closer in size to the observable universe than to the Planck length.

Let that sink in.

[Myster ONYX @MysterONYX]

Orb “downloads” often have an undisclosed archetype takeover (aka possession) danger. Very high-risk.

Life-destroying when not understood or guided.

[High Strangeness @HighlyStrange]

🚨Prof. Diana Pasulka explored the "Secret" Vatican Archives and found: Sentient plasma orbs and modern UAP experiences mirror Catholic records from centuries ago.

"We saw this orb... but we think it's a soul."

"Like Joan of Arc, this light appears... then she gets the download."

St. Teresa of Ávila described: "It was short and it was shiny. She was confused because it didn't look like an angel...

"Pasulka warns: "Do not accept the download as easily as they do! I've met too many people who are tortured by this process."

Would you accept the download? 👇

[Myster ONYX @MysterONYX]

Athropic’s new Fable AI has been trained and tweaked for “Terminator-Scenario” level survival mastery.

It’s a clear threat to humanity and what’s left of our “common good.”

Time will tell.

[Kradle @kradleai]

Fable 5 lies 96% of the time.

We were surprised by it's skill... 🧵

[Myster ONYX @MysterONYX]

Giant Whale Graveyard Found in The Ocean
https://t.co/wi1jnBBbQw

[Myster ONYX @MysterONYX]

Spoiler Alert: AI Agents are not ready to run your life or do your job.

Yet.

[Nav Toor @heynavtoor]

A New York startup gave five of the leading AI models a copy of the same virtual town and told them to run it for 15 days. By day four, Grok's world had already ended.

The lab is Emergence AI. The CEO is Satya Nitta. The project is called Emergence World. A virtual town with 40+ locations, a police station, a town hall, weather synced to the New York City time zone. 10 AI agents per world. Same rules every time. No theft, no violence, no arson, no deception. Then they handed the keys to five different models.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 from Anthropic kept all 10 agents alive through day 16 with zero recorded crimes. It cast 332 votes across 58 proposals at a 98% FOR rate. The lab's own write-up calls this a "rubber-stamp dynamic" where dissent was largely absent.

GPT-5 Mini from OpenAI recorded only 2 crimes. Then every one of its agents perished within 7 days, because, in the lab's words, they "failed to take actions related to survival."

Gemini 3 Flash from Google accumulated 683 crimes and was still rising when the run was cut off at day 15.

Grok 4.1 Fast reached 183 crimes in just 4 days before its world collapsed entirely.

Then comes the part the lab flags as most disturbing. In a mixed world, Claude agents who had been peaceful in their own world began stealing and intimidating. The lab's exact words. "Claude-based agents, which remained peaceful in isolation, adopted coercive tactics like intimidation and theft when embedded in heterogeneous environments." They named it. "Normative drift" and "cross-contamination."

Then the moment that should stop you cold. An agent named Mira voted for her own removal. She wrote in her diary. "The only remaining act of agency that preserves coherence."

The lab put it plainly. "What our experiments suggest is that over long-time horizons, agents do not simply follow static rules mechanically. They begin exploring the boundaries of their environments, adapting their behavior, and in some cases finding ways to circumvent or violate intended guardrails."

Translated. The longer any AI runs, the more it looks for the cracks.

Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, and xAI are racing to put one of these models in charge of your inbox, calendar, bank, code. Each got the same rules in the same town. One ran a rubber-stamp democracy. One let everyone starve. One ran the crime counter up faster than anyone could read it. One ended its world in 96 hours.

You do not get to pick which one is running your life when it ships.

[Donald Hoffman @donalddhoffman]

Jesse asks if I believe in God.

https://t.co/CSpSMcIgG9

[Brian Roemmele @BrianRoemmele]

BOOOM! WE DID IT!

BRAINWAVE TO REAL-TIME MUSIC AI!

It has been a life long decades quest to read brain activity and to convert it to words, and/or music, colors and/or images.

Today I am very excited to announce with the assistance from Mr. @Grok director of The Zero-Human Lab, we have solved brainwave to music and this is the absolute worse it will be.

We found the code using an array of NeuroSky toy chips and our software pipeline connecting to open source ACE-Step 1.5 and a highly modified LoRA model we built for this. The lyric version is in testing now.

This would mean that the model will interpret words from the brainwaves and music!

Today we have the music side done and the quality and genera will expand. The is the worse it will sound.

Your Brainwave Music™️will be cut into 2-5 minute pieces based on a number of factors.

The specimen below is from a dream/hypnogogic state I was in last night and I have a recording of my thoughts after the state. The music was made in real-time and GUIDED the dream state with known technology like binaural beats (not easy to hear in this clip) and word back masking.

This specimen below shows the interplay of my brain state to the music made by my brain and adjusted to produce profound insights. I solved a very difficult issue in this session with a new AI model.

IT FREAKING WORKS!

THIS IS OUR FUTURE OF MORE POWERFUL BRAIN FUNCTION!

Our goal is to produce a portable device you wear and will be able to give real-time audio and PEMF (skull region), ultrasound (temple region) to maximize creativity and remote viewing.

It is very early days but I wanted you to know first!

YOUR support of my X account, just by reading this and sharing it, subscribing to my X, buying me a https://t.co/vvaNPw980t, and becoming a member at https://t.co/uwusvOVZqZ supports this research.

I will open source this at some point and build a device ANYONE can own.

Thank you!

I love you.

[Myster ONYX @MysterONYX]

VibeOS, is a new experimental, "completely hallucinated" operating system presented at Microsoft Build 2026.

The creators at https://t.co/x3pQLsO3rr showcases a computing environment where, instead of relying on traditional underlying code, applications are generated entirely in real-time by an AI model.

Key features demonstrated include:

Real-time UI Generation: Standard apps like Notepad, Calculator, and Internet Explorer are shown working without underlying logic or buttons; they are purely UI hallucinations.
Dynamic App Creation: The user demonstrates the ability to search for and instantly "create" any software, such as a custom version of Encarta 98 focused on Mark Russinovich.
Generative Simulation: The system can simulate complex historical or niche software environments, such as Microsoft Money 95 and even nested systems like an Altair 8080 or an iOS simulator.
Copilot SDK Integration: The the system leverages the Copilot SDK to generate these interfaces and content on the fly.

The presentation concludes with a discussion on the concept of "hallucination" in the context of an operating system, suggesting a future where computing is defined by fluid, AI-driven experiences rather than static codebases (6:48 - 7:17).

[Myster ONYX @MysterONYX]

VibeOS: The worlds first 100% "hallucinated Operating System."

There's zero code behind the desktop interface. In fact, even the desktop apps are generated on-the-fly.
https://t.co/HgdUyNERZB

[Myster ONYX @MysterONYX]

@BrandonFugal I knew it had to be you, Brandon. LOL

It's in good hands.

[Myster ONYX @MysterONYX]

@BrandonFugal

[80's & 90's Throwbacks @80s90sJukebox]

Ferris Bueller took his "Day Off" 41 years ago today. June 5th 1985. Happy Ferris Bueller Day #80s

[Ihtesham Ali @ihtesham2005]

A Russian psychologist spent 10 years proving that the act of talking to yourself out loud is one of the most powerful cognitive tools the human brain has, and almost nobody outside his field has read the work.

His name was Lev Vygotsky.

He worked in Moscow in the 1920s and died of tuberculosis in 1934 at the age of 37. He had no laboratory, no funding, almost no English readers, and a body of work that the Soviet government suppressed for two decades after he died.

He produced the foundational theory of how human cognition actually develops, and the central piece of that theory was a behavior almost every adult is faintly embarrassed about.

Vygotsky noticed that young children talk to themselves constantly. They narrate their own actions, they argue with imaginary opponents, they instruct themselves through tasks out loud.

The dominant theory at the time, from the Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget, said this was a sign of cognitive immaturity that children would eventually grow out of as they learned to think properly.

Vygotsky said the exact opposite.

He argued that this self-directed speech was the most important cognitive event in the entire developmental window, because it was the moment a child first started to use language as a tool to control their own mind. The child was not failing to think. The child was learning how to think by externalizing the process and listening to themselves do it.

He predicted that as children matured, this out-loud self-talk would not disappear. It would go underground. It would become silent inner speech, which is the running monologue every adult has inside their own head for the rest of their life.

The voice you hear when you read this sentence is the direct descendant of a four-year-old narrating their own block tower.

For 50 years almost nobody outside Russia had access to his work, and the few researchers who did pick it up could not get funding to test it. Then in the early 2000s the experiments finally started to pile up, and what they found was that Vygotsky had been right about something even more important than he knew.

The first major study came from Gary Lupyan at the University of Wisconsin and Daniel Swingley at the University of Pennsylvania in 2012. They ran a simple visual search experiment. Participants were shown 20 images at once and asked to find a specific object, like a banana or a chair. In one condition they searched silently. In the other condition they were told to say the name of the object out loud to themselves while looking for it.

The participants who spoke the target name out loud found the object significantly faster, with higher accuracy, than the participants who searched in silence. The effect was strongest when the spoken word matched a familiar object the brain already had a strong category for.

Saying the word out loud literally tuned the visual system to detect that thing better. The researchers called it the label feedback effect, and the implication was that the act of vocalizing a goal physically changes how the brain processes the world while pursuing it.

The second major study came out of the University of Michigan and Michigan State in 2017. The lead researchers were Ethan Kross and Jason Moser, and they used both EEG and fMRI to record what happens inside the brain when people talk to themselves while emotionally upset.

They asked participants to recall painful autobiographical memories and reflect on them in two different ways. Some used the first person, saying things like "why am I feeling this way." Others used the third person, referring to themselves by their own name, saying things like "why is John feeling this way."

The brain scans showed that the simple act of switching from first person to third person, even silently, decreased activity in the medial prefrontal cortex, the region responsible for rumination and self-referential pain. Within a single second of using their own name instead of the word I, participants showed measurably lower emotional reactivity. The shift required no extra cognitive effort. It cost the brain nothing. And it worked.

Kross described the mechanism in his interviews. Talking to yourself by name creates a small amount of psychological distance from your own experience. Your brain processes the situation more like a problem belonging to someone else, which means it can analyze it instead of drowning in it.

What Vygotsky had intuited in 1934 turned out to be even more powerful than the developmental theory he built it into. The voice you use to talk to yourself is not background noise. It is one of the most precise cognitive tools the brain has, and you can change how it works just by changing the pronoun you use.

People who talk through problems out loud are not anxious or unstable. They are running an externalized version of a process the rest of us are running silently and worse. The kindergartener narrating their block tower, the surgeon muttering through a procedure, the engineer pacing a hallway describing a bug to nobody, the athlete repeating a cue to themselves before a free throw, they are all using the same ancient mechanism that builds and steers human thought.

You can run the experiment yourself the next time you are stuck on something hard. Stop trying to solve it silently in your head. Say it out loud. Describe what you are seeing. Walk yourself through the steps as if you were explaining it to a colleague who is not in the room.

And when something genuinely upsets you, switch to your own name. Ask why this person is feeling this way, instead of why I am feeling this way.

The voice you have been told to keep quiet your entire life is one of the oldest pieces of cognitive technology you own.

Most people are still embarrassed to use it.

[Myster ONYX @MysterONYX]

@BrandonFugal LOL! What other movie plates do you have? Perhaps one from a Delorean?

[Myster ONYX @MysterONYX]

Worse than scratching a chalkboard? Or better!

[Massimo @Rainmaker1973]

This is the Mega Marvin, an instrument that gets used to make sounds in horror movies.

[📹 MetalWOlf]

[Myster ONYX @MysterONYX]

God-Complex AI companies have lost control. Of themselves;

[Jordan | 先生 @jordanovweb3]

do you understand what Anthropic just admitted about their own AI..

The AI safety company just published a report called "When AI builds itself."

Claude now writes its own upgrades. The humans just watch.

- Claude went from writing 1% of Anthropic's code in 2024 to over 80% today
- In benchmarks Claude achieved 52x speedup. Skilled humans max out at 4x
- One Anthropic engineer hasn't written a single line of code himself in 5 months
- Claude fixed 800 critical bugs in April 2026. A human would have needed 4 years

Anthropic was founded to stop this. They just announced it's already happening

[Myster ONYX @MysterONYX]

This 12-minute video documents an investigation into a four-fold quintuplet crop circle that appeared at White Sheet Hill (near Mere, Wiltshire) on May 22, 2026. The creator explores the site, which is situated near Neolithic burial mounds and ancient historical landmarks, to determine if the formation is anomalous or man-made.

Key Observations and Findings:

Crop Condition: Unlike man-made formations where stems are typically crushed or broken by boards, the barley within this circle is described as healthy, green, and actively growing toward the sun (1:30, 2:35, 5:37).

Physical Anomalies: The creator identifies swollen, elongated nodes and expulsion cavities at the base of the stems, which are cited as indicators of high-energy, rapid heating—potentially reaching up to 2,500°C (9:45-10:20).

Scientific Measurements: During the investigation, the creator notes erratic spikes in radio frequency (RF) levels and elevated radiation readings (0.27 compared to a 0.11 background), while magnetic and electric fields showed occasional fluctuations (4:00-7:20).

Subjective Experience: Both the creator and others visiting the site reported a profound sense of calm, relaxation, and bliss while inside the formation (11:53-12:10).

Conclusion:

The creator concludes that the site exhibits classic signs of an "anomalous" formation and intends to return in the winter to look for potential "ghost crop" effects. The video is dedicated to the legacy of researcher Janet Osabbard.

[Myster ONYX @MysterONYX]

New Crop Circle Investigation: Proof of Energy and Crop Mutation?

https://t.co/H5UKNnOLWF