@JosephCont38960@townmenace23@MiiaTzu@krack932 Accusations were made against him, sure. But as the Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard case and the Door Dash girl from earlier this year have shown, woman do indeed lie about this kind of stuff.
@jameshemphil@PixelBibleBytes Maybe give the show another watch then, because most of what you list does get explained. Not in detail, granted, but it does get explained.
You also seem to think that it’s a mystery box kind of show (like Lost) when really it’s more of a character drama.
@jameshemphil@PixelBibleBytes Their pasts do come up in episode 5 in the bar scene. Episode 3 explains why Kinger becomes sane in the dark. And episode 8 explains what C&A was trying to do.
@townmenace23@MiiaTzu@krack932 Money used to hush someone. Which in itself isn’t illegal.
So, yet again I ask, what underlying crime was Trump found guilty of that was being covered up?
@jameshemphil@PixelBibleBytes What door faces are unaccounted for that you’re referring to exactly? And even if another business didn’t buy the building in the time between Ragatha and Jax, there’s any number of scenario where Ribbit and Kaufmo became involved.
@jameshemphil@PixelBibleBytes Not necessarily. And tearing down buildings cost money, so if it was left unsold then why would the owners pay that money to demolish it? The only reason to do that is if there’s a plan for using the land afterward.
@jameshemphil@PixelBibleBytes Between when Ragatha sold or tried to sell the building and when Jax arrives it becomes abandoned. Why would it matter as to who owns it between those two points? What reason would Ragatha need to bring up her past if the circus was her new reality now?
@jameshemphil@PixelBibleBytes Abandoned buildings that just sit there without being demolished are fairly common. And given the age of the computer and headset, potential thieves probably just didn’t deem it worth stealing.
@jameshemphil@PixelBibleBytes But only Kaufmo and Ribbit came after Ragatha that aren’t part of the show’s main cast. As I say in my other reply, everyone else seems to have come roughly when Kinger did; thus assumedly fellow C&A employees, possibly along with family members.
@townmenace23@MiiaTzu@krack932 When you tell me what separate crime was being covered up that makes it a felony.
What about the hush money payments were “illicit” exactly? What law did they in themselves break to make them illegal? And when was he found guilty of this alleged crime?
@JosephCont38960@townmenace23@MiiaTzu@krack932 You seem to be operating under fallacies that 1) merely knowing Epstein back in the day somehow automatically means that you know of the secret criminal business he was up to, and 2) that merely being in the files automatically means that you were a client of said business.
@townmenace23@MiiaTzu@krack932 Your analogy assumes that Trump is spending someone else’s money instead of his own though.
Regardless though, you’re once again merely referencing the original misdemeanor crime. What separate crime was it covering up that turned it into a felony?
@townmenace23@MiiaTzu@krack932 That’s the misdemeanor crime. What underlying separate crime was it to cover up?
Or are you saying that any payments to Michael Cohen are illegal? In which case, what law states that?
@townmenace23@MiiaTzu@krack932 That explains the misdemeanor crime (though it sounds pretty logical to categorize expenses paid to one’s lawyer as legal expenses). Earlier though you admitted that it has to be done to cover up another crime to upscale it to a felony.
So, what crime was he covering up?