Mystique

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@PillowsCoolside @901Lulu Absolutely not. Everyone is just so comfortable normalizing inappropriate behavior by a minor and refuse to examine her conduct. She was not a passive participant in this for sure.

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@lazyfaeriee @901Lulu You and I are exactly alike. 💋

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@spacecowgrll @901Lulu And...because she was a child, that means we can't examine her conduct? Stop normalize bad behavior.

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@spacecowgrll @901Lulu Right back at you. 💋

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@hablatutti @901Lulu Right back at you. 💋

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@lazyfaeriee @901Lulu Right back at you. 💋

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@withintheblues @212mediaTV I am absolutely not a Bot. No need to feel that way.

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@withintheblues @212mediaTV Protecting children requires looking at the full circle of adult responsibility, not just one individual.

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@withintheblues @212mediaTV Protecting children also means asking difficult questions about what they were exposed to, what influenced them, and how situations like this develop.

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@withintheblues @212mediaTV What concerns me is that some people seem unwilling to discuss the nature of those conversations at all. Acknowledging a child's vulnerability does not mean we should ignore behaviors, language, or circumstances that may require understanding.

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@kushandruh @212mediaTV Understanding context is not the same as assigning blame for what happened.

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@kushandruh @212mediaTV The discussion is whether we can examine the full circumstances, behaviors, and dynamics surrounding a situation without ignoring uncomfortable facts

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@kushandruh @212mediaTV No one is saying anything a child says or does justifies violence or takes away from the tragedy of a life lost. That is not the discussion. .

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@fangirlbigail @212mediaTV The problem is refusing to have a broader conversation. Holding an adult accountable does not mean we should ignore or normalize a 13-year-old engaging in sexualized conversations. Examining the full context is not blaming a child, it is critical thinking.

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@KiDChosen___ @212mediaTV Understanding all aspects of a situation is not the same as blaming a child.

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@KiDChosen___ @212mediaTV No one is arguing that an adult should pursue a relationship with a child. That responsibility is clear. The question is whether we can examine the full context of a situation without pretending a child's words, behavior, and circumstances don't exist.

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@Ovo_Denny @212mediaTV Discussing a minor's behavior is not "blaming a child." It is asking questions about the circumstances, influences, and dynamics involved. Holding an adult accountable and examining the full context are not mutually exclusive. Both can exist.

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@212mediaTV innocent, or does it suggest a more complex situation?

[Mystique @Mystiquedb]

@212mediaTV After reading the text exchanges, I don't believe Celeste was merely an innocent bystander. I can't place all the moral blame on him alone. Based on the messages, she appeared to be an active participant, not simply a passive one.