Max 🍇 @MythosMax - Twitter Profile

about 4 hours ago

Some thoughts. I'm going to post my critique of the manosphere in the next few days. But long story short... Fertility and marriage have gone up and down throughout history due to economic and technological changes, medical advances, and war. Feminism is "downstream" or a "lagging indicator" of material conditions. The almost universal monogamous society of 1950s and '60s America was an aberration, not anywhere close to being the norm across world history. Men who are more intelligent or richer, or more brave, bold, aggressive, or reckless, have outbred their contemporaries throughout world history—again, with the notable exception of maybe 20 years in mid-century when America had a brief period of almost universal monogamy . This fits the breeding pattern of aggressive male completion among mammals and, even more so, the "breed then die" ethos of insects. The "manosphere," as it's currently constituted, is a resentful, socialist movement of low-status men. They feel entitled to aberrational, illusory universal monogamy, not to mention a steady job and wife. Marxists would make recourse to labor strikes to get what they want. The Manosphere claims that they are "traditional," which they most certainly are not. On the other hand, I'm ambivalent about feminism, to the degree that it represents "choosiness" among women. Only the strong get through and thus have a future. Perhaps feminism is Mother Nature's response to the dysgenic breeding patterns that people like Andrew Wilson want to universalize. It's a way of breeding higher types or at least reducing lower types. As for the Wilsons, I think I made myself clear. They are a contemptible and embarrassing pair. Andrew is a weakling. His wife is an obnoxious slut and probably deranged. No polite person would bring up their chaotic "family" unprompted ... but since they go on lecturing people about "tradition" and "Christianity," they make it fair game. In a word: Yikes! As for the debate, I asked for 10 minutes to make an opening statement. I obviously would give Wilson the same in return. I need five minutes to clear my throat, and expect a productive conversation and back-and-forth. This was apparently too much to ask! A similar thing occurred when Rebel Wilson "debated" RFH. She demanded that RFH turn on her video, which she was, at the time, in no position to do and had expressed as much. She then quit, in the same manner that Andrew did. My sense is that this pair wants to turn "technicalities" into debate victories. No one's buying it. Regardless, both Andrew and Rebel are vile, ignorant proles, and I'm quite happy to never cross paths with them again.

71

567

39

161

17K

Max 🍇

@MythosMax

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users