@Kldd_fra@Abduo202603 Oh thanks for sharing my beloved genart collection. Fake because my main account ? Haters hating, buildees build, keep your addy and gtfo ๐
A sneak peek at some things we'll be bringing with V2:
- More community focus: a dedicated area for backers & holders to raise concerns and give feedback directly to founders.
- On-chain data transparency: better surfacing of fund flows, usage & token distribution.
- Full UI rework: A simplified UX to help backers understand what is happening pre & post raise.
All of this will be dropping later this week, along with a multitude of other platform improvements and new raises.
What is the point of a protocol token if the protocol doesnโt actually need it?
That was one of the first problems we wanted to solve with Tolly.
Too often, a platform launches a token while the product operates completely independently from it. The platform can grow, volume can grow and thousands of users can trade while the token itself has no structural role.
Tolly was designed differently from day one.
Every token launched on Tolly creates another market connected to the same TOLLY flywheel.
When those markets trade, their fees donโt only support that individual project. Part of the fee flow is hardwired to buy and remove TOLLY from circulation.
At the same time, the system rewards holders, supports creators, funds the protocol and buys & burns the launched project token.
So TOLLY isnโt sitting beside the platform hoping to benefit from growth.
Every new market adds another fee-generating node feeding the same protocol token.
V4 takes that model further with programmable creator economics, while the underlying TOLLY flywheel stays intact.
More markets โ more activity โ more fee flow through the same system.
A protocol token should have a reason to exist. TOLLY does.
And the mechanics are visible directly in Tolly Analytics.
https://t.co/RayA2GNsr2