This woman just said - with a straight face, in an interview she knew would be seen by the whole world - that she found the lack of âcompassionâ from the prosecution in a murder trial were three babies were arranged to be âbiasedâ and âcoldâ. And that this affected her âright out if the gateâ
Tell me more about how the âholdoutâ juror was misapplying the law and not properly evaluating evidence.
These juror interviews are extraordinary. They are admitting openly that they disregarded the law entirely for the sake of letting Clancy off the hook. Thereâs no other way to read it.
One juror says she originally wanted to vote guilty but changed her mind so that âLindsay could get the help she needs.â That is a clear violation of the law. They were supposed to make a determination solely about guilt or innocence. They were not there to make sure anyone âgets help.â
Another juror says she voted not guilty because the prosecution never produced âcharacter witnessesâ proving Clancy was a âbad mother.â The problem is that A) killing your children IS definitive evidence that youâre a bad mother, and B) the prosecution would not have been allowed to call those kinds of witnesses. A witness solely testifying that Clancy was a bad mother would have been purely prejudicial. So this juror acquitted because the prosecution failed to provide evidence that they werenât allowed to provide and which would have been irrelevant anyway. Extraordinary. This same juror even admitted that it was a âfactâ that Clancy âviciously killed her children.â The word vicious literally means âdone maliciously and with intent.â So if thatâs a fact then they were obligated to vote guilty. But they didnât.
Meanwhile another juror swooned over the defense attorneyâs âentertainingâ demeanor. And another one said that all of the facts of the case â âeverything,â her words â âprovedâ that Clancy âloved her children.â Apparently strangling your children to death, in this jurorâs mind, does not at all call your love for them into question.
Just a collection of the most morally obtuse idiots ever assembled. Amazing.
The judge in the Clancy case needs to hold contempt of court hearings for the nurse jurors who reportedly ignored expert witness testimony and brought in external information (who could possibly understand the information without an external background lecture from nurses on the jury), rather than relying on expert witness testimony, and then used that to attempt to bully a juror into agreeing with them.
Lindsay Clancy jurors giggle over how âentertainingâ & âcompassionateâ Kevin Reddington was.
âJust his whole demeanor was funnyâŠâ
Totally insane. There was zero chance of a guilty verdict because the female jurors were in love with Clancyâs attorney.
@RamboMizzou@footballlady24 Iâm so sorry to hear this Rambo. You and your family have my condolences and prayers you find you the closure you guys need.
Wait..waitâŠwaitâŠbefore they said that none of them were getting SNAP benefits and now they are suing to keep them getting benefits.
Ffs. This is total BS.
BIDEN: Letâs wipe out $23 billion in student loan debt, pass paid leave and stimulate the economy.
MAGA: COMMIE!
TRUMP: Letâs spend $100 billion on war in Iran, launch trade wars, increase prices, triple my net worth & break the economy for working people.
MAGA:
Me: "Diesel is $6, the national debt is exploding, and weâre dragging the country into another neocon war in Iran."
MAGA: "Oh, so you want a 6'3 guy with a beard playing womenâs sports under Kamala?!"
It's wild how they use culture war slop to shield Trump from his failures.