Nduru

[Nduru @NDURU430]

@KingTunde_SZN 12 holes

[Nduru @NDURU430]

@KingTunde_SZN 10 holes

[Nduru @NDURU430]

Do you remember when you joined X? I do! #MyXAnniversary

[MaziTundeEdnutfan @HonestNarrativ]

Just In: “In my 12 years as a prison warder, I have met all kinds of people. I have seen many politicians and many influential individuals, but I have never met a man as wise as Nnamdi Kanu. His words touched my heart. Please, let him go.”

— A prison warder allegedly assigned to Nnamdi Kanu has reportedly resigned after hearing him speak.

According to the claim, the warder, identified as Abubakar, said:

“Everything Nnamdi Kanu told me is the truth. I am a human being, and I know the truth when I hear it. There was no lie in anything he said. Listening to him made me fear for the future of this country.

Nigeria is indeed a zoo if a man like him remains in prison while many politicians responsible for the nation’s problems continue to walk free.”

[Kanunta kanu @MaziKanuntaKanu]

⚖️ EXPOSED: The Judicial Lawlessness Keeping Nnamdi Kanu Imprisoned! Once a judge drops the gavel on a final judgment, they become functus officio—meaning the court's power over that case is completely dead.

So why was Mazi Nnamdi Kanu sentenced to life in prison under a repealed law after the Court of Appeal already discharged him on October 13, 2022?Because former defense lawyers Mike Ozekhome and Ifeanyi Ejiofor failed to do their jobs, after they sold out Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s case for a payout and walked away. 🤮💰

They ignored Onyendu’s direct orders to file a simple 2-page Preliminary Objection that would have killed the trial on the spot. They were sacked for this exact blunder, yet they tried to blame us for their incompetence.

Now real lawyer has exposed the trash legal landscape. ZEKERI IDRIS (NDC case) said it clearly: A judge cannot just reopen a case after a final judgment! Why did MNK's ex-lawyers stay silent? The sabotage is clear, but the fight isn't over.

Nigerian Supreme Court when are you ruling on the case of MNK’s discharge?

#FreeMNK

[Nduru @NDURU430]

As Igbos, our trauma from the Nigerian condition has strained core values like Igwe bu ike and onye aghala nwanne ya. We’ve supported many presidential candidates, yet acceptance remains elusive. Time to unite, reject self-sabotage, and demand the release of Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu—who embodies a major hope for many Nigerians. The notion of his incarceration and another election charade is unfathomable. #IgboUnity #FreeNnamdiKanu # NigeriaNeedsChange

[Nduru @NDURU430]

Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu remains resolute and unwavering. Let us recall his admonition that he would never disappoint us, and that we risk disappointing him in return. Some former colleagues have already fulfilled this warning. To those who remain, please stay steadfast—the end is near.

[J. C. Okechukwu @jcokechukwu]

People are waking up en masse. Nothing lasts forever…

[Nduru @NDURU430]

Check out NDURU's video! #TikTok https://t.co/gA0ZY0daSf

[Barbir @Alex_Barbir]

Official US Capitol Address on Nigeria.

[Kanunta kanu @MaziKanuntaKanu]

Fellow Biafrans, depending on your time zone, Good evening, Good Morning and Good Afternoon to you all.

I am your Servant Mazi. Simon Chibueze, the newly appointed Swiss IPOB National Coordinator. Married with three kids, I am from Orlu Province in Biafraland but reside in Zurich. Mazi Chris Aka is the new appointed Deputy National Coordinator.

Our appointment took effect after the 3rd Administration of Directorate Of States (DOS) was abolished on the "directives" of our leader Mazi Nnamdi Kanu few days ago as a result of their long accumulated shortcomings which most of you are aware of. We know most of you who may have heard the announcement of our appointment have been waiting anxiously to hear or read our acceptance speech. If you had listened to Biafra Radio on 20.06.2026 you may have heard during our first radio broadcast with the newly appointed HDOS Dr. Chris Nwaogu where we enveloped how [OUR] Administration will function.

I want you to lay emphasis on my use of "OUR" above. It is to the fact that our administration will be a "We-word adminstration" that will carry everybody along. An administration that will do things differently unlike before. Differently, because our administration will be one that will never allow "Command And Control" to trample upon the truth. Where Command and Control conflicts with the Truth, we must follow the path of the Truth. In view of this, we in this new administration are calling on all of you who left this struggle as a result of how the 3rd Administration were handling thing to please 🙏come back with a renewed Spirit for us to forge ahead. Come and see how OUR administration will add values to all your monetary contributions and your time input. Come and witness the UNITY OUR administration will showcase. Come and see accountability in action. Come and witness how WE carry everybody along. Come with your questions and get professional answers to them. We are here to serve not to be served.

In the days ahead, we will be using Modern Technology to carry out our first meeting with Agenda containing only opening prayer and Group interaction. Meeting duration will be 45 Minutes ONLY.
Fellow Biafrans, a new day has begun and a new page opened. Come and write your name on it. On our Leader Mazi Nnamdi Kanu we stand, his doctrine we shall follow and on his philosophy we fight.
May Chukwu okike abiama grant us the ability to steer the struggle to success. Ise! Ise!! Ise!!!
Accept our lovely regards.

Simon Chibueze
(Swiss National Coordinator)

[HABIBU YUSUF SODANGI @HabibaIdri40129]

My dear Nigerians pls watch this video indeed Hausa people need support to free themselves from Fulani Orlighachy terrorisms and Banditry all we need is alliance with any political party that will help us free from this cancerous disastereous Fulani that are consuming us day and night. NO MAN IS AN ISLAND. We were Steamrolled by Fulani we're seriously awakening needing support to free ourselves against these terrorists Fulani remember Fulani Fulani are 6% but out of the 6% 4% are in our forest terrorizing here and there so actually Fulani are insignificant they don't votes that's why they force that forceful marriage called: Hausa/Fulani to get control over us but Hausa alone covered up to:45% of Nigeria,s votes. We're just Fulani puppet so as we're awakening we need support to boost the grassroots

[Kanunta kanu @MaziKanuntaKanu]

The 3rd IPOB DOS Administration is finished. No memo from the Anambra Government House can bring any of you back.

[Kanunta kanu @MaziKanuntaKanu]

The 4th Administration of the Directorate of State (DOS) for the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has been officially inaugurated. We extend our warmest congratulations to Mazi Chris Nwaogu on his appointment as the new Head of the Directorate of State (HDOS).

[Rachel Nwosu @ObiJYkKg6QGWMAD]

Thank God we did it🎊The last foriegn affairs committee members signed on our document yesterday and very soon,2 to 3 weeks we will have a big historical day for Biafra at the Israeli parliament. Hard work of 9 months brought this wonderful result.I'm very happy.All hail Biafra☀️

[Rachel Nwosu @ObiJYkKg6QGWMAD]

On my way to Jerusalem to reach more achievements and more tops for Biafra and for Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, the ONLY leader of the Indigenous People Of Biafra. Every week more tops. Thanks to Elohim/God/ Adonai/Chukwu Okike Abiama☀️🙏🏽⚘

[Kanunta kanu @MaziKanuntaKanu]

PRESS STATEMENT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

MAZI NNAMDI KANU DISSOLVES THE 3RD ADMINISTRATION OF THE DIRECTORATE OF STATE (DOS) AND INAUGURATES THE 4TH ADMINISTRATION

Langerfeld, Germany
17 June 2026

Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, the Supreme Leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) Worldwide, Head of the Biafra Restoration Project, Director of Radio Biafra, and by the special grace of the Almighty God, a servant of the wonderful people of Biafra, has today dissolved the 3rd Administration of the Directorate of State (DOS) of the Indigenous People of Biafra.

Pursuant to the authority vested in him as Supreme Leader, Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu hereby inaugurates the 4th Administration of the Directorate of State (DOS) and appoints Mazi Chris Nwaọgụ, who is based in the United States of America, as the new Head of the Directorate of State.

Mazi Chris Nwaọgụ shall assume immediate responsibility for the administration, coordination, and day-to-day management of IPOB affairs, working with his team under the authority and direction of Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

Background

The Directorate of State was established by Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu in 2012 as the administrative arm of the Indigenous People of Biafra. Since its inception, the Directorate has been headed by:

Dr. Justin Akujieze — (USA) Head of the 1st Administration
Mazi Uchenna Asiegbu — (Spain) Head of the 2nd Administration
Chika Edoziem — (Switzerland ) Head of the 3rd Administration (appointed in March 2017 during Onyendu's detention at Kuje Prison)
By the express order and authority of Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, the 3rd Administration is hereby dissolved and the 4th Administration is duly inaugurated with immediate effect.

REASONS FOR THE DISSOLUTION OF THE 3RD ADMINISTRATION

The decision of Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu to dissolve the 3rd Administration of the Directorate of State was not taken lightly. It followed a careful assessment of the performance, priorities, and stewardship of the movement during one of the most critical periods in the history of the Biafra restoration project.

The primary duty of any administration entrusted with the affairs of IPOB is to protect the movement, safeguard its integrity, defend its members, care for those who suffer persecution because of their commitment to the cause, and advance the strategic objectives laid down by Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

Regrettably, the 3rd Administration fell short of these sacred obligations in several fundamental respects.

Abandonment of Detained Biafrans

The most grievous failure of the outgoing administration was its inability to prioritize the welfare and liberation of hundreds of Biafrans detained across various detention facilities, particularly those held for years without trial at Wawa Military Barracks in Niger State.

Many of these men and women suffered unimaginable hardship. Some died in detention. Others endured prolonged incarceration under conditions that should have mobilized the full attention and resources of the movement. The few who survived were reportedly compelled to accept outcomes they would otherwise have resisted simply to preserve their lives and regain their freedom.

No movement that claims to stand for justice can neglect those who paid the highest price for their commitment. The abandonment of detained Biafrans represents a profound dereliction of the duty of care owed to every member of the IPOB family.

Misplaced Priorities and Internal Distractions

At a time when the movement faced unprecedented external attacks, too much energy was diverted into internal disputes, personal rivalries, gossip, blackmail, and factional controversies.

Valuable time, resources, and organizational capacity that should have been directed toward diplomacy, legal advocacy, prisoner welfare, public engagement, and strategic planning were instead consumed by distractions that weakened cohesion and undermined confidence within the movement.

[Nduru @NDURU430]

Peaceful assembly is a constitutional right. Any use of force must be investigated, independent of political influence. Accountability protects democracy. olitical dissent is not a crime. Distinguish security concerns from persecution. Uphold presumption of innocence and fair trial standards for all detainees. #RuleOfLaw #JusticeForAll
#RightToProtest #PoliceAccountability #Nigeria

[Kanunta kanu @MaziKanuntaKanu]

The complaint is therefore not just “I was not allowed to speak.” It is that the Appellant was blocked from using the very opportunity the court itself had said would be available to address the fundamental legal problems with the case.

4. Issue Seven Is Another Link in the Same Jurisdictional Chain

Eculaw calls Issue Seven “intellectually creative but legally unsupported by any Nigerian authority.”

The filed text shows something tighter.

Issue Seven applies the same basic logic the Brief uses in Issues One and Two:

Parliament creates jurisdiction.
Parliament sets the conditions for jurisdiction.
Courts cannot bypass or waive those conditions.
If the condition is not satisfied, jurisdiction does not arise.

Here, the relevant condition comes from the sole extant charging statute at the time of continuation — the TPPA 2022. Section 76(1)(d)(iii) requires double criminality for conduct with an international element. The Brief treats this not as an optional evidential detail the prosecution can gloss over, but as a statutory gateway that must be crossed before jurisdiction can attach.

The argument is not primarily “the rendition was unlawful.” It is that, under the law Parliament actually enacted for these situations, the gateway was never crossed. Double criminality was never established. Therefore, jurisdiction never vested.

This is why the key sentence in the filed version carries real weight:

> “Double criminality is therefore not a matter the prosecution may omit, the court may overlook, or the State may waive. Unless established, jurisdiction does not arise.”

It is a competence argument. And it sits cleanly inside the Brief’s overall method.

The assessment never really confronts the central question the Brief poses: if Parliament placed double criminality inside the jurisdiction section of the Act and expressed it in mandatory language, how can a court treat it as optional? Eculaw moves immediately to “the Supreme Court already found jurisdiction” without addressing the Brief’s answer — that finding pre-dated the post-remittal analysis under the TPPA 2022 framework.

5. Issue Eight Is Framed More Carefully Than Eculaw Suggests

Eculaw claims the Brief asks the Court of Appeal to declare the Supreme Court judgment unconstitutional.

The filed Issue Eight does not do that. It asks more limited questions:

What legal effect did the Court of Appeal’s 13 October 2022 judgment actually have?

Did that judgment trigger the constitutional protection against being tried again?

What clear legal step was taken afterwards to remove that protection?

Even if the protection was lifted, what law actually gave the trial court power to continue?

The Brief relies on existing Supreme Court decisions to argue that once a case has been finally ended in the accused’s favour by a higher court, it cannot simply be resumed — it must be properly restarted through the recognised legal route. No such restart order was made.

This is narrower than the version Eculaw criticises.

6. The Criticism About “Cascading Theories” and Length

The assessment worries that the Brief buries its strongest points under too much connected argument.

The filed Brief does not hide its structure. It states clearly at the beginning that the issues are arranged as connected constitutional conditions, each of which must be met. It explains its length in its own words: the trial court denied the normal opportunities to raise and argue these issues at first instance. The length is tied directly to the trial court’s procedural decisions.

[Kanunta kanu @MaziKanuntaKanu]

Final View

The Eculaw assessment only partially engages the Brief. It is at its weakest when it reduces Issue One to a generic repeal point without properly scoring the gateway argument the Brief actually makes, treats the fair hearing complaint as ordinary and disconnected, flattens Issue Seven into unsupported creativity, and describes Issue Eight as an attack on the Supreme Court. The filed text shows these issues are framed more narrowly, technically, and consistently than that.

A court may still prefer a narrower route and decline to follow the full chain the Brief sets out. That is a legitimate institutional choice. But a fair assessment should first engage the arguments as they are actually written in the filed Brief, rather than simplified versions of them. On that score, the Eculaw piece falls short.