@Fishingforlolco U keep asking me questions instead of answering mine. Here's mine, again: explain the 12 mismatched mugshots. Same height, different faces, midnight booking times. U said 12 like it was proof so explain it. And then explain 2507AC000277-HR. 2 questions. No new 1s until u answer.
@Fishingforlolco@nirvisa I know. Now answer the number anyway: 2507AC000277-HR. It's on your docket. It returns No Records Found. You are the enemy that made it. So explain your own work.
@Fishingforlolco 11 hours ago you said Donovan is a nutjob who thinks I'm stalking him. Now you say I've been stalking Donovan. Which is it — defender or detractor? Same account. Same night. Two answers.
@Fishingforlolco "Craw Fish
@Fishingforlolco
·
11h
Donny, you are crazy as ever living hell. You think that Matthew Weider is stalking you and so is Tim Seekins. Nothing you say makes any sense. You have no proof of anything other than you are a nutjob 🎯"
@Fishingforlolco@nirvisa 12 mugshots with the same height, same booking times, and different faces isn't a defense — it's the proof. The aggregator sites themselves say they don't guarantee accuracy. They're scrapers, not courts. So 'it's online' doesn't mean 'it's real.' It means someone typed it in.
@Fishingforlolco@nirvisa Same thing as the docket: scraped, stitched, mismatched. 12 mugshots, same height, different faces, midnight timestamps — same tells as the fake docket. The same generator made both. So answer one of them: what is 2507AC000277-HR? Or are we switching to mugshots because