So, uh, this happened. Absolutely unexpected, especially since I didn't think there was enough archaeology in it. Very happy of the connection with Jim Wiseman who has been an inspiration for decades. His pioneering vision of a unified archaeology is still central to my views.
Thrilled to announce the conference "The Origins of the Forum and the Basilica", organized by myself, Alessandro Pierattini, & @NTerrenato at the University of Notre Dame-Global Gateway, Rome, on June 5-6. For more information & registration visit: https://t.co/YVtgZnfJ64
@meddiss I've always thought that's a sign of better, more thorough scholarship. I am especially in awe of those who have footnotes that they will not read, of course.
@meddiss I know right? I'm strangely drawn to her crude deconstruction of Romanness. There _has_ been an overemphatisation of it for nefarious colonialist purposes, but not of course in the absurd conspiracy way that she thinks...
AFAIK, the excavations by Panella in the area show that the Colosseum foundations cut buildings that burned in Nero's fire of 64, as well as Domus Aurea structures that surrounded the pond. This would make the hypothesis untenable.
We have to wait for the full article, of course
New archaeological hubbub in Rome
Roemische Mitteilungen would be about to publish an article by Freyberger speculating that the Colosseum would have been built on top of an earlier amphitheater, possibly the one of Statilius Taurus.
https://t.co/RxEVdZezNK
The paper is still embargoed but the media writeup is by Rinaldi Tufi, a very respected senior archaeologist who taught at U Trieste for decades.
It is certainly a bold hypothesis, that appears to be based on architectural and stylistic analysis more than on stratigraphy.