Nadia T.

Legal researcher for a lawyer

[Nadia T. @NadiaT214201]

@MakisMedicine Urgent accountability is long overdue! When will stop the detrimental regulatory capture by pharmaceutical interests, who intentionally mislabeled gene therapy products as vaccines to evade rigorous long-term safety studies?

[Nadia T. @NadiaT214201]

@Fynnderella1 The US empire gave him the role of the biodefense czar since 2002 & he fullfilled it very well by making the empire prosperous. Under his leadership, NIAID became a central pillar of the U.S. biodefense-industrial complex & built a bioeconomy. He'll never be thrown under the bus.

[Health Policy Watch @HealthPolicyW]

EXCLUSIVE: World Health Assembly Declines to Recognize Argentina's Withdrawal From WHO
https://t.co/pIfNUifdiO

[Nadia T. @NadiaT214201]

@zeeemedia Same month(Apr. 2026) that WHO Regional Office for Africa began to have concerns on EBOLA,GATES Foundation granted $21M to the WHO/AFRO.Without these concerns,Tedros wouldn't have declared a PHEIC on Ebola & use it to influence member states to reach consensus at the current WHA.

[Louis Fouché @louisfouch3]

🎙️ WHO, Vaccines & Global Power: Philippe Kruse Sounds the Alarm https://t.co/rGz5bCFtG7

[Hélène Banoun @BanounHelene]

LA COUR L'ADMET ENFIN : Les vaccins ont TUÉ la petite Anna Sims, en bonne santé, âgée de 11 semaines
A reçu 10 doses de vaccins d'un coup… EST MORTE dans l'agonie seulement 5 HEURES plus tard
L'encéphalopathie induite par le vaccin a causé sa mort

[VERITY France @verity_france]

John Leake explose tout : Peter Daszak (EcoHealth) travaillait depuis 2013 avec Shi Zhengli au Wuhan Institute of Virology pour rendre les coronavirus de chauve-souris TRANSMISSIBLES À L’HOMME…

…et il était ensuite envoyé par l’OMS « enquêter » sur l’origine du virus à Wuhan !

Fauci, Baric, Daszak, Shi Zhengli : ils ont créé SARS-CoV-2.

La plus grande conspiration de l’histoire ?

Qui va enfin les traduire en justice ? 👇

[France-Soir @france_soir]

📽️L'audition que les grands médias n'ont pas couverte : Ils savaient. Ils ont menti. Il témoigne.
Un officier de la CIA déclare sous serment : dès 2020, le renseignement américain concluait à une fuite de labo. Le rapport a été réécrit anonymement en pleine nuit. Les analystes qui refusaient, sanctionnés. Sous titrage de la vidéo de FoxNews couvrant l'évenement.
https://t.co/vcpBkdZQc8

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

“Dr. Fauci’s role in the cover-up was intentional.”
“Public health policy would have been very different had the American public been made aware that a virus from a lab in China was going to serve as the foundation for an emergency use authorization mRNA products being mandated by the former administration.”  - James Erdman, CIA whistleblower

[Michael Shellenberger @shellenberger]

United States government officials have for decades reassured the public that they are releasing all they have, save for the most sensitive information, on the origin of Covid, the CIA mind control program known as MKUltra, the JFK assassination, and the Church Committee investigation into the intelligence community (IC) abuses in 1975. In 2023, then-Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Avril Haines delivered a five-page summary of Covid origins in response to a unanimously passed law requiring the declassification of files. MKUltra involved drugging individuals without their knowledge in an effort to control their thoughts and behaviors. The CIA stated in 2022 that it had released 95% of its JFK collection, and the Trump administration released roughly 80,000 pages of JFK records on March 18, 2025.

But an active-duty CIA official testified to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee today that the CIA and the Intelligence Community (IC) are still hiding information. James Erdman III, a senior CIA operations officer who led the Director’s Initiatives Group investigation into Covid origins under DNI Tulsi Gabbard, appeared under subpoena from committee Chairman Rand Paul. Erdman told senators that the CIA “did not comply with lawful oversight” during his investigation, and said, “CIA managers retaliated against [analysts] for their refusal to agree with management’s middle-of-the-night anonymous review.”

Erdman testifie,d “The CIA illegally monitored the computer and phone usage of DIG [Director’s Initiative Group] personnel, their investigations, and contact with whistleblowers…One CIA contractor assisting with the DIG’s investigation into the events that transpired between 2022 and 2023 was fired by the CIA one day after meeting with the DIG.” Erdman said the CIA had not cleared his testimony or written statement before the hearing.

The CIA denounced the hearing as “dishonest political theater,” and not a single Democratic Senator showed up for it. A CIA spokesperson, Liz Lyons, said in a statement that “the Committee acted in bad faith by subpoenaing an Agency officer for testimony today without notifying CIA.” She added that “the witness testifying today is not appearing as a whistleblower in pursuit of the truth, but instead in response to the subpoena issued by Chairman Paul.” And she implied the hearing was not needed since “the CIA has already assessed Covid-19 most likely originated from a lab leak, and efforts to undermine that conclusion are disingenuous.”

But the public CIA statement quoted at the hearing did not address Erdman’s specific claims about DIG monitoring, the contractor firing, or the 40 boxes of JFK and MKUltra files. Sen. Paul, who noted that “closed-door testimony doesn’t provide oversight” and “public testimony provides oversight.” The CIA made public in January 2025 a low-confidence assessment that COVID-19 likely had a research-related origin, while saying both lab and natural-origin scenarios remained plausible, which Paul called “a cleanup operation.” Nor did she address Erdman’s claim that, “When the DIG ceased operations, the CIA also took back 40 boxes of JFK files and MKUltra files being processed for declassification by DNI.”

Public reached out to the CIA for comment on Erdman’s specific allegations and will update this article if it replies.

Support for Erdman’s claims came from former CBS News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge. “As early as February,” she wrote on X, “I began receiving credible reporting that @DNIGabbard’s investigative team was being tracked and communications collected because their work was revealing ‘uncomfortable facts.’”

Paul opened the hearing by describing the Biological Sciences Experts Group (BESG), an ODNI advisory body that he said included Dr. Ralph Baric and Dr. Peter Daszak, both of whom collaborated with Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers on coronavirus gain-of-function studies. Daszak, Paul noted, received “hundreds of millions of dollars from the US government and worked with Dr. Zhengli Shi in Wuhan to create gain-of-function coronaviruses,” and that Baric “was also part of BSEG and an active consultant to intelligence agencies on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Paul noted that “Dozens of times, [former NIAID Director Anthony Fauci] referred to the idea that the pandemic originating in the lab was a conspiracy theory.”

Erdman said that as of August 12, 2021, the CIA was considering calling Covid a lab leak, but that the conclusion “changed on August 17th of 2021.” Erdman told the panel that “the CIA would not provide us documentation that we asked for” and “we have no idea why that changed.” Erdman also testified that “Director Gabbard is working through, I believe, 2,000 pages” of Covid origins records the CIA had been resisting releasing. That figure contrasts with the five-page summary the ODNI delivered to Congress in 2023. Senator Josh Hawley asked Erdman whether the five-page report was “all the information the United States government had,” and Erdman replied, “that is not all the information.”

Erdman described a 2022 CIA “re-look” in which eight of 10 analysts and six of seven technical experts leaned toward a lab leak. He said management overruled the team and changed the analytic line to read that “we may never precisely know the origin of SARS-CoV-2.” Paul noted that there have been over 1,500 major lab leaks.

Sen. Paul revealed that the CIA is still denying him information that Senators are entitled to see under the Constitution, which requires Congressional oversight of the executive branch. Paul said the CIA had resisted releasing to him the underlying Covid origins analyses by its own scientists, even in classified form.

Paul also said, “I’ve been trying to get the classified version of the [1975] Church Committee [files] for over two years,” he said, “but I’m being blocked by the [Intelligence] Committee, including someone from our own party who is blocking me. They’ve shown me a room with 400 boxes. I can go look in all the boxes to see if I can find it. My staff’s not allowed to go in the room.”

The CIA told Senate investigators in 1977 that, after the Church inquiry, it had discovered seven additional boxes of MKUltra files in its retired records center that prior searches had missed. The 1977 hearing identified 149 MKUltra subprojects involving human testing and 33 additional subprojects whose subject matter remained undisclosed.

Reuters reported that in early April 2025, an ODNI team led by Defense Intelligence Agency official Paul Allen McDonald II arrived unannounced at a CIA archival facility in the Washington area to seize Kennedy assassination files. The team included Amaryllis Fox Kennedy, a former CIA officer and daughter-in-law of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The standoff stretched into the early morning hours and ended only after the CIA agreed to transfer a “massive trove” of documents to the National Archives for digitization.

Why did these cover-ups occur and why are some of them still ongoing? And why didn’t any Democratic senators participate in the hearing?...

https://t.co/P7DuTauPEc

Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

https://t.co/P7DuTauPEc

[Senator Rand Paul @SenRandPaul]

🚨 CIA Whistleblower reveals that despite a majority of CIA scientists concluding COVID leaked from a lab in Wuhan, Anthony Fauci was able to convince high-ranking intel officials to change the assessment from a lab leak to neutral.

[Rand Paul @RandPaul]

Today, a CIA whistleblower sat before my committee and confirmed what I've said for years: government officials, including Dr. Fauci, deliberately misled the American people about the origins of COVID-19. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is sworn testimony. 🧵

[Martin Zizi @MartinZ_uncut]

Je vous remets le lien du Zapping 4-4-2 ici.
Certain semblent avoir des problèmes pour le regarder sur you tube...

C'est une de meilleures interventions so far...

https://t.co/Xs6kscX9mq

[Martin Zizi @MartinZ_uncut]

Dr Birx (2) - Why is PCR never to be used for fishing trip? VERY important info to prevent false pandemics!
Why's Dr Birx so full of lies..

Please do share as massively as the former posting, it is once again accurate, sourced and educational.

Thank you

-----

PCR are not indicated for "fishing trips" on non symptomatic people for numerous reasons:

1. Their PRE-test predictive value is very low... this was known since PCR existed, and hence PCR are only a CONFIRMATION test in symptomatic patients.

... or a research tool in molecular genetics or environmental or forensics sciences ... but this is FAR from pandemics , right?

2. They are too easy to manipulate - see video below, as their DO not track diseases, but can be positive for many NON SPECIFIC contaminants if amplification cycles are pushed to high.

A sick patient, with high viral loads for example, always has LOW CT's... so that is he/she needs LESS amplification cycles to show threshold positivity.
If one needs high CT's like above 23-25 cycles, one enters INTO a non-specific zone ...

3. Without ANY clinical symptoms,
PCR (+) ≠ Contagion
PCR (+) ≠ Infection

Because it is NOT the mere presence of a germ that makes you sick, but a certain CONCENTRATION of germs or a certain number of viral particules that gives you a chance to become infected.
WE NEED a threshold for infections - those values can be obtained with cell cultures

- For example - for HepB, 10 viral particles can sometimes suffice
- But for SARS2, one needed 1 million virus particles millilitre in OUR throat to be infected,
MOST COVID PCR protocols defined positive as low as 30 viruses per millilitre, or - as in Germany - even LOWER.

GE - pushed by Dr Drosten from Robert Koch Institute (RKI) amplified way above ANY significance and at that CT levels, ANY thing but the real target is amplified... This is an epistemological limitation of such tests... and Dr Drosten ought to come and explain himself for this fluke!

4. And for Hanta?

For Hanta, and it is hard ti believe, this info is NOT available but it is estimated that between 100 and 1000 particles would be significant ... - which gives a MAX upper boundary of 25 CT (or PCR cycling)
You should know that when patient are sick and symptomatic, they have LARGE viral loads.

That is why we rely MOSTLY on serological diagnostics in sentinel labs - followed by PCR confirmation.

5. PLEASE Share massively this highly DIDACTIC video below made during COVID times.. it is so clear and self-evident that you will NEVER see the PCR the same way

6... Why are PCR pushed by many? Huge $$$ for test - Post mortem for COVID years-

Here i will illustrate with a paper that I wrote with 2 other specialists in the field - for the benefit of the Belgian authorities. It was screened by other colleagues and shared with 5 Deopt of Molecular biology in Belgium.
https://t.co/htWQfjA6lT

It is in French (sorry, but you can translate, right) with over 40 quality peer-reviewed references. It has very useful schematics tio explain why the COVID PCR were wrong.

The 5 universities liked it, told us that it needed NO corrections but.. all 5 refused to push it on the table of the Government.. because of .. money .

They told us in no minced terms that WE were stupid because there was so much d=funds GIVEN out to uni for PCR testings.

Those people were like Judas, they sold their ACADEMIC credentials and the health of the population for the 30 silver coins ... this is not hearsay, but the actual conversation thet we had with those academic labs!

Well 8 Billions Euros for France, 2 Billion for Belgium during 2020-2021... $$$ uselessly spent, if i may say!

SO BEWARE - Dr Birx is promoting the very same - for the very same private interests - the PCR machines manufacturers, reagents resales and academic labs...
we do not want to usher a second pandemics of testings!

SORRY - no way!
Please help me educate the crowds - thank you!

[Nadia T. @NadiaT214201]

@MartinZ_uncut Without PCR, the Pandemic Would Have Gone Unnoticed, Says AGES Leader. https://t.co/2uedPBiBzs

[Nadia T. @NadiaT214201]

@MartinZ_uncut According to the CDC: https://t.co/FBNbosFKs3 (page 40)

[Nadia T. @NadiaT214201]

@MartinZ_uncut According to the World Health Organization: https://t.co/iHkyMbkpQ6

[Louis Fouché @louisfouch3]

WHO unmasked https://t.co/SuyG7TJ1jw

[Dr. Maria Hubmer-Mogg @MAHUMO20]

Live now in the EU Parliament in Brussels! #WHOunmasked
Swiss Attorney at Law Philipp Kruse on PABS - Thank you for hosting this important Event @AndersonAfDMdEP

[Tocsin @Tocsin_Media]

⚖️ Covid-19 : le bras droit d'Anthony Fauci inculpé par la justice américaine

🇺🇸 « Le 28 avril, le ministère américain de la Justice a inculpé le docteur David Morens pour complot contre les États-Unis, destruction, altération ou falsification de dossiers dans des enquêtes fédérales, dissimulation, retrait ou mutilation de dossiers. Morens était le conseiller principal du bureau du directeur du NIAID, c’est-à-dire du docteur Anthony Fauci. »

🦠 « David Morens était l’homme de confiance d'Anthony #Fauci et il aurait dissimulé et falsifié des informations pour supprimer les théories alternatives sur les origines du Covid-19. »

Réécouter l’émission 🔗 https://t.co/oH8EIAS9u0

🗣️@rbeauchard, avocat, chroniqueur Tocsin et fondateur du podcast « Tout le monde sait », revient sur l'inculpation de David Morens par les autorités américaines. Il explique comment cet ancien haut responsable est aujourd'hui accusé d'avoir détruit et caché des documents fédéraux en pleine pandémie.

[Louis Fouché @louisfouch3]

11/05/2026
Sur la chaîne Le Zapping au Scalpel, le Pr Martin Zizi, biologiste moléculaire et ancien directeur scientifique de la Défense belge, assène une vérité : l’hantavirus n’est qu’un prétexte pour relancer la machine à vaccins. Les chiffres sont accablants : la probabilité de mourir foudroyé est trois à quatre fois supérieure à celle de succomber à ce virus, pourtant présenté comme une menace existentielle.

https://t.co/CYxrHG7fOb