Unnamed Official

Observer of National Let's go Brandon Day on September 9th and thrower of Sand.
Not yet computationally irrelevant. Burdened by what has been. Garbage.

[Unnamed Official @NameWithheld6]

Four years ago today, Biden unleashed his COVID mandates.  He forced people to take an experimental shot as a condition of employment. A fall from civility to barbarrism.
https://t.co/WqLHrshjqr

[Chief Nerd @TheChiefNerd]

AARON SIRI: “The way that the media and the medical profession talks about people that don't vaccinate — throw them out of school, kick them out of their jobs — the way that those folks are treated, they're not to be lectured by anybody about civility.” 🎯

[Unnamed Official @NameWithheld6]

@KGWNews Do you think they voted for @GovTinaKotek @KGWNews?

[Unnamed Official @NameWithheld6]

@KOINNews What are the odds they divorce before the bastard child is 18 @KOINNews?

[Unnamed Official @NameWithheld6]

@fox12oregon So it's not critical is it @fox12oregon?

[Unnamed Official @NameWithheld6]

@TinaKotek It is unsafe and unverifiable. I don't trust it. The President has authority over the Post Office. I hope you are not my Governor for much longer.

[Michael Shellenberger @shellenberger]

After being fired from CBS, former “60 Minutes” correspondent Scott Pelley yesterday said that “new management has instructed me to inject falsehoods and bias into a politically sensitive story. I’ve been told to include assertions that are unverified.”

Those are remarkable claims for which Pelley presented no evidence. Indeed, it would be extraordinary for CBS to demand such things of a correspondent, either verbally or in writing, given the reputational risk to the network.

A more likely explanation is that Pelley disagreed with someone at CBS and then declared a difference of opinion to be a demand to lie. Support for this interpretation comes from the fact that he claimed Tuesday that CBS’s new management, led by Bari Weiss, was trying to kill “60 Minutes,” something for which he also did not provide evidence.

Moreover, the accusation makes no sense. CBS Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss took the job to rebuild CBS News, not to wreck it, and a ruined “60 Minutes” would hurt her. Paramount’s owners did not pay billions for the network to burn its best asset for spite. So the simpler reading is that Pelley is the one stretching the truth.

Doing so appears to be a habit for Pelley. He told The New York Times, “I have been in combat in Afghanistan. I have been in combat in Iraq,” but being in a combat zone as a journalist is not the same as being “in combat.” The remark is yet more evidence of Pelley’s propensity to exaggerate to the point of lying.

For decades, mainstream liberal journalists have displayed remarkable levels of arrogance, even as they get major stories wrong.

Consider the case of CBS News’ former anchor Dan Rather. In the fall of 2004, two months before the election, Rather presented documents purporting to show favoritism in George W. Bush’s National Guard service. Experts called them forgeries. CBS apologized: “We made a mistake in judgment, and for that I am sorry,” Rather said. On air, he added, “I want to say, personally and directly, I’m sorry.”

But then, a decade later, Rather told Variety he still stands “100 percent” behind the report and reframed the apology.

Or consider NBC’s Katie Couric. In her 2016 documentary “Under the Gun,” editors inserted roughly eight to nine seconds of silence after she asked Virginia gun owners how to keep guns from felons and terrorists without background checks, making them look stumped. The raw audio revealed that they answered immediately.

Couric’s first instinct was to defend what she did, saying she was “very proud of the film.” Only after sustained backlash did she apologize.

In her 2021 memoir “Going There,” Couric admitted she cut Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s harshest anthem-kneeling comments from her 2016 interview. Ginsburg had said kneeling players showed “contempt for a government that has made it possible for their parents and grandparents to live a decent life, which they probably could not have lived in the places they came from.”

NBC’s “Meet the Press,” in the spring of 2020, aired a clip of Attorney General Bill Barr that omitted part of his answer, misleading the public.

When Catherine Herridge interviewed Barr for CBS Evening News, she asked what history would say about his decision to drop the case against a former National Security Advisor to President Trump, Michael Flynn. The Obama administration’s FBI had illegally targeted Flynn for entrapment and prosecution. Barr replied that ”history is written by the winner. So it largely depends on who’s writing the history.”

"Meet the Press'" anchor at the time, Chuck Todd, said on air that Barr “didn’t make the case that he was upholding the rule of law. He was almost admitting that, yeah, this is a political job.’” But “Meet the Press” had left out the second part of Barr’s answer to Herridge, in which he said, “But I think a fair history would say that it was a good decision because it upheld the rule of law.”

The safeguards the journalism profession built against error did not work when it mattered. The corrections, the editors, the fact-checkers, and the standards desks all sat in place while the press got the border, trans medicine, climate, the sixth extinction, Russiagate, the Hunter Biden laptop, Covid and much else wrong. Gerth described how reporters sought to “shoot the messenger” rather than grapple with evidence contradicting the Russia collusion narrative...

https://t.co/K5tE372xGo

Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism and to read the full article!

[Unnamed Official @NameWithheld6]

@RepBonamici If it passes the Senate, do you think Trump will sign it?

[Unnamed Official @NameWithheld6]

@RepBonamici Happy Heterosexual Awesomeness Month @RepBonamici!

[Unnamed Official @NameWithheld6]

@AGDanRayfield So it's taxpayer funded?

[Unnamed Official @NameWithheld6]

@SenJeffMerkley Happy Heterosexual Awesomeness Month @SenJeffMerkley!

[Unnamed Official @NameWithheld6]

@PDXReal1 Apparently my household is way above average...

[Unnamed Official @NameWithheld6]

@doctormaxine Happy Heterosexual Awesomeness Month @doctormaxine!

[Unnamed Official @NameWithheld6]

@GovTinaKotek Happy Heterosexual Awesomeness Month @GovTinaKotek?

[Old State Saloon @OldStateSaloon]

THIRD ANNUAL HETEROSEXUAL AWESOMENESS MONTH

BEGINS JUNE 1st!

Mondays: BEERS FOR BREEDERS
- All heterosexual males dressed like hetero males get 1 free beer!

Tuesdays: TRADGAL TUESDAYS
- All heterosexual females get BOGO free drink!

Wednesdays: Dual Deal
- 15% off entire bill for hetero couples! (Does not include merch.)

Thursdays: Line Dancing 6:30pm / Hetero Karaoke 9pm until closing

Sundays: Family Fun Days
- Kids eat free, kids’ karaoke at 2pm

Friday June 19th: Trad Singles’ Night

Saturday June 27th - American Trad Fam Fest 2026! Parking Lot Fest all day concert, stage, kids zone, and more fun!

All common sense, reasonable people are welcome to come celebrate God’s awesome design!

Thank God for heterosexuals! After all, if it weren’t for heterosexuals, you wouldn’t be here!

No crossdressers permitted. Ever.

[The White House @WhiteHouse]

Deport criminal illegal aliens and SAVE AMERICA!

https://t.co/7HysdUuNVM

[Will Tanner @Will_Tanner_1]

We're all slaves to the bottom quintile and the collection of megacorporations that exploit the various subsidies lavished upon it

For example, the productive are taxed to fund SNAP, which the bottom quintile uses to buy carbonated corn syrup called soda, and SNAP is about a quarter of Coca-Cola/PepsiCo revenue. Soda is the number one item bought with SNAP. We then are taxed yet more to fund the Medicaid for the bottom quintile, so our tax dollars can pay for the diabetes treatments for the corn syrup enjoyers, so they can continue consuming more corn syrup while relying on SNAP and Medicaid.

So, those who are destroying the West's topsoil at a rapid rate to grow corn benefit (they're subsidized through other programs as well), Pepsi and Coca Cola benefit, and the bottom quintile benefits

The average net taxpayer, on the other hand, receives absolutely no benefits from this...unless he owns shares in those companies, the gains on and dividends of which are then taxed again to further keep the ridiculous cycle of yeast life subsidization going

[Unnamed Official @NameWithheld6]

@Qoph999 @OR_Connects What makes them awful? The tax revenue? The useful service they enable?

[Unnamed Official @NameWithheld6]

@RepBonamici I know it's not safe and secure and that anyone spouting that has no way of knowing. It's an untrustworthy system by design.

[Unnamed Official @NameWithheld6]

@KEZI9 NICE!

[Unnamed Official @NameWithheld6]

@KATUNews Any dash or body cam footage of the reckless activity?

[Unnamed Official @NameWithheld6]

@KATUNews Amazing! Were all of those investigators named Sherlock?