their reply is insane wdym an outfit that was custom made for newjeans fits illitโs โstyleโ more?? belift and hybe have completely ruined newjeansโ brand and I am TIRED of everyone acting like they have no similarities
@jjangjt33 They expelled her unjustly and still sued and demanded money from her, this is insanely disgusting, I hope that the judge rejects that case and ADOR has to pay for Danielle for all the damages they caused against her and then MHHH will also use this to rescind their contracts!
ADOR Changes Damages Claim After Switching Legal Counselโฆ Reduces Claim Against Danielle and Min Hee-jin by โฉ10 Billion
https://t.co/2ChcjiU8de
Reporter Lee Tae-jun
- ADOR: โWe will continue to strengthen our arguments and evidence as the lawsuit progresses.โ
- Danielle and Min Hee-jinโs side push back, calling it โa warning intended as retaliationโ and โmalicious.โ
ADOR, the agency of NewJeans, has reduced its damages claim against member Danielle and former CEO Min Hee-jin (currently CEO of OOAK Records) by approximately โฉ10 billion, lowering the amount from around โฉ43.1 billion to โฉ33.1 billion. The adjustment follows the appointment of new legal counsel and a revision of the claims.
According to the legal community on the 5th, ADOR recently revised the damages claim in its lawsuit against Danielle, Danielleโs mother, and former CEO Min from approximately โฉ44.1 billion to โฉ33.1 billion.
ADOR explained:
โA new legal representative was appointed and reviewed the case, reorganizing the claims and accordingly adjusting and revising part of the amount. We will continue to supplement our arguments and evidence as the litigation proceeds.โ
The first hearing in the case was held on May 14 before the Civil Agreement Division 31 of the Seoul Central District Court (Presiding Judge Nam In-soo). At the time, the claim amount was reported to be approximately โฉ43.1 billion. Neither Danielle nor Min personally attended; only their legal representatives appeared in court.
Danielleโs attorney argued:
โFrom the outset, the plaintiff singled out Danielle among the NewJeans members, notified only her of contract termination, and filed a massive damages lawsuit against her. The lawsuit serves the improper purpose of warning the other members that they too could face retaliatory litigation if they do not cooperate.โ
The attorney further contended that prolonging the lawsuit would effectively waste Danielleโs active career years in legal disputes, raising concerns about intentional delays.
Min Hee-jinโs attorney echoed this criticism, stating:
โAttempts like this, motivated by a malicious intent to devastate the defendantsโ lives, should not be tolerated.โ
In response, ADOR denied allegations that the lawsuit was targeted retaliation, saying:
โWe have never interfered with Danielleโs entertainment activities and have no disagreement with her pursuing activities.โ
However, ADOR added:
โWhile we seek a prompt determination of rights, any method that restricts the plaintiffโs ability to present evidence would itself be problematic.โ
The court decided to later consider Danielleโs request to separate the proceedings for each defendant. The judges also suggested that ADOR submit any precedents from industries such as sports involving structures similar to tamperingโthe practice of contacting contracted individuals before the expiration of their agreements.
This lawsuit stems from the suspension of NewJeansโ activities in the second half of 2024. In November 2024, the members held an emergency press conference and declared that their exclusive contracts with ADOR had been terminated effective November 29, proceeding with independent activities. The decision came after their demand for the reinstatement of former CEO Min Hee-jinโwho had been removed following conflict with HYBEโwas not accepted.
ADOR subsequently filed a lawsuit in December 2024 seeking confirmation that the exclusive contracts remained valid. On October 30 of last year, the court ruled in ADORโs favor at the first-instance trial. The judgment became final after the members chose not to appeal.
Following the final judgment, the members gradually expressed intentions to return. At present, three of the five members have confirmed their return, while Minji is reportedly still discussing specific conditions for her return.
In contrast, ADOR separately notified Danielle in December of last year that:
โShe can no longer continue as a member of NewJeans,โ
and informed her of the termination of her exclusive contract.
The next hearing, scheduled for June 11, will be the first since ADOR appointed new legal counsel and reorganized its claims.
@Pixel_Ada@npomvtt a familia de TDS as meninas lutaram para elas serem livres daquela empresa nรฃo apenas a familia da Danielle e a prรณpria Ador รฑ sabe apresentar o motivo de expulsar e processar ela mas pelo visto vc hybe stan sabe entรฃo ajuda Ador pq eles estรฃo precisando e fugindo do tribunal