@Heroifrit@Type07Safety Yes. These are kids. Which means you faulting the second kid for reacting reflexively as a kid would more than the kid who acted with forethought and malice makes you an idiot.
You're the one supporting the aggressor here. That last part you wrote is a giant dumbass leap.
@Heroifrit@Type07Safety And I didn't say they were the same. I implied the retaliatory strike need not be proportional to the initial attack. Only idiots with a false sense of moral superiority think the victim should show restraint bc the attacker turned his back .
@Heroifrit@Type07Safety Right. You'd either call me a liar or lie about your IQ no matter what I posted. I know I'm more intelligent bc your initial response to me was to interpret what I said as physical aggression rather than a simple analysis. You probably have an abnormally small prefrontal cortex.
@Hortysir@MagneticNorse As devils advocate let me ask, if you have a tiger in your yard on a chain can you tell the neighbors they are making the neighborhood unsafe by getting a tiger?
@jshoaf2000@Type07Safety lol. The second kid reacting emotionally to being assaulted shouldn't earn a permanent ban. The first assault by the other kid should though.
@guideforlovers If he cheats he is the bad guy. Grow up and be frank with her. Tell her if intimacy doesn't return you're leaving. He needs to do his part in that. It's a reciprocal relationship. If nothing changes then leave. No need to cheat if you act like an adult.