@Maniacal_Troll @Celticsfan748 @AbhorrentBeing@MalesInDisguise It shows that I was right in predicting that you don't understand or take interest in the biochemistry that determines the truth of the matter, because you would have known that mentioning FSH, LH and GnRH was in reference to Clomid's pharmacodynamics.
@Maniacal_Troll @Celticsfan748 @AbhorrentBeing@MalesInDisguise Asking you to clarify what your standard of proof is after rejecting my evidence as insufficient is not an argument. It's a polite request to hold up your end of a civil disagreement. If you can't specifically define your viewpoint, you don't really have one, you're just arguing.
@Maniacal_Troll @Celticsfan748 @AbhorrentBeing@MalesInDisguise I think it should have been very obvious that the purpose of the request was to get you to commit to a viewpoint because you changed your argument, not to use Google for me. You're the smart one here, so why pretend to be obtuse?
@Maniacal_Troll @Celticsfan748 @AbhorrentBeing@MalesInDisguise I have no skin in the game, I banked enough sperm for six kids at 25. But let's keep playing the goalpost moving game, it's fun making you do mental gymnastics.
What even is "testicular atrophy"? How long does someone need to take HRT for it to occur irreversibly? Define terms.
@Maniacal_Troll @Celticsfan748 @AbhorrentBeing@MalesInDisguise Guy who clearly doesn't understand what FSH, LH, or GnRH are (but will probably pretend to, after three minutes of Google and/or asking their chatbot of choice) wants to smugly inform people about the biology of fertility.
Comedy truly is legal on Twitter, just not as intended.