@SybilHorror6@Team_Opsec@PrimordialAA@LayerZero_Labs So what's the point of limiting the deadline? I can write a logical report, start with a few hundred submissions, copy someone else's gang address information, add it to my list, and then I'll announce that I've improved the algorithm and caught a more concrete witch gang.
@SybilHorror6@Team_Opsec@PrimordialAA@LayerZero_Labs I don't think so, I pointed out the problem in his data, and then he adjusted the data based on my feedback, the quality of the report is not real anymore, is it unfair to allow revisions after the deadline
@artemis_rsch @Team_Opsec@PrimordialAA According to my data analysis, the results are not so good, if you observe carefully, you will find that many gang evidence is not so sufficient, found that many unrelated addresses are mixed in a gang.
@Team_Opsec@PrimordialAA Let me have a try. group 1677 has a total of 24 addresses, and it seems that the behaviors are not so consistent. I have checked the behaviors at these addresses, and there are big differences in interaction time and interaction contract.
@Team_Opsec@PrimordialAA Can you please list any evidence that these addresses are similar? Here are the related addresses in the gang (13 addresses, more than half).
@bitsmiley_labs As for the first 1999 Twitter followers who only passed more than 900 lists, and the remaining 1,000 addresses did not pass, I did not understand what the official screening rules are. I asked for tickets on dc, but I did not get a positive reply, please ask who can help me.