Nawmps

🔞 ✨ 25 ✨ Transfem/Femboy (She/Her) ✨ UwU

Just a silly Twitch egirl doin silly egirl stuff :3

MINORS DNI

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

Ara~
Such a good kitty~
Goooood giiiiirl~

Gorgeous commission of me reminding @Rellshie just how much of a good girl she is~ ;3

Art by the wonderful @/Aoiro_arts !! 💖

[Rellshie | Cat Girl Vtuber failure 🏳️‍⚧️ 💕 @Rellshie]

How is this possible? how its possible that a person voices their experience, gets harassed and twitch prefers to silence that voice instead of doing the right thing and help the streamer?

Twitch has nazis, transphobics, cults, people abusing the system, even people inside the fucking company ignoring this behavior and in some occasion encouraging it

I have friends that stopped streaming because of the current state of the platform, people getting harassed by bigger streamers, people that had hopes and dreams crushed by a company's greed

I'm so fucking tired of this shitty behavior, they don't care about us, they never did, we are disposable puppet, we are nothing else to twitch, NOTHING

The worst part is that they know,but they will never do anything about it, we are on our own, keep speak about all the stupid shit the company has done, maybe one day, they will hear use.

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

workout progress... thoughts? ;3
(older video i hadnt posted akdjskfkakd)

[Rellshie | Cat Girl Vtuber failure 🏳️‍⚧️ 💕 @Rellshie]

@anlacki Reference/Pose <3 and HAPPY BIRTHDAY <3

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

@Rellshie From hot guitarist daddy to hot guitarist mommy 👀

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

@RyanShinigami Thanks for that. Go fuck off now, genuine pedo defender.

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

@RyanShinigami Also, go fuck yourself for trying to accuse me of this same thing again. Even the thought disgusts me.

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

@RyanShinigami I see you're not actually interested in displaying any level of literact or comprehension, and that this discussion wont go anywhere.

Oh well, it is what it is I suppose. If you find minors (real or fake) attractive, you are a pedophile.

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

@RyanShinigami Of course not. Why would that be necessary? A depiction of a minor in a sexually explicit content is a depiction of a minor in a sexually explicit context. Why the fuck would it matter whether its a photo or an artistic rendition for the sake of medical definition?

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

@RyanShinigami Does it now? Last time I checked, medicine, an extension of science, is the best model by which we can ascertain the nature of reality. And it certainly does not agree with you.

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

@RyanShinigami This isn't a court of law, nor is it a debate. You asked for definitions, I provided them. Whether you want to accept the medically recognized definition of the term is out of my hands entirely.

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

@RyanShinigami Whether or not you find the attraction in animated or real depictions of adolescence is irrelevant.

The definition of pedophilia is focused on *adolescent children.* The context isn't necessary to further make these subcategories distinct, even if law treats them differently.

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

@RyanShinigami If you want to beg for evidence, then why don't I do the same? Can you produce even a single shred of evidence of your claim?
You cant. You're not only wrong, you're defensive and disgusting. Trying to assign such a label to someone whose gone out of her way to destroy pedophiles

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

@RyanShinigami https://t.co/OGdfa12kvY
The first line of the abstract of this well-cited paper alone refutes your claim. Also, I made sure it was a medical journal this time so you couldn't worm your way out with legal caveats.

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

@RyanShinigami It's ironic that the one lobbing accusations of projection is also the one stating that deflecting is evidence of guilt. Also ironic that they're the one trying to defend shota/loli.

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

@RyanShinigami We can agree on the last part, as can any functional member of society. The first part would be heavily contested by the vast majority of psychologists and medical professionals.

It's also just plain disgusting.

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

@RyanShinigami Fair play. I should have used medical journals as opposed to legal journals. Regardless of the laws at play, the definition that I (someone studying med) gave *is* the medical definition of pedophilia. It is unethical, and a paraphilia whether or not it extends to the real world.

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

@RyanShinigami As an extension to this, pedophilia is by definition, a paraphilia. Which also, by definition, is a sexual attraction deemed immoral or harmful by nature.

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

@RyanShinigami Don't you dare ever fucking accuse me of this shit ever again, first of all. Second of all, it took a singular search in a criminal psychology journal. https://t.co/xWdLAuGj3u

Note that abusing someone in the real world is not required for pedophilia. Being attracted is enough.

[Nawmps @Nawmps]

@RyanShinigami If you find depictions or images of minors attractive, whether real or animated, you have a form of paraphilia known as pedophilia. Whether that causes you to act on your desires in the real world is something else entirely, and irrelevant to this discussion. Both are harmful.