Would that be possible to collect and regularly update the relevant cases and other manifestations of any relevant view or comment, and make this collection public (names of proponents, quotes, date of publication, police and d.a., court decisions and public comments (with a short description of the case and/or the court decision)?
And: in this collection, the arguments for release should be enlisted (made by whom and when) in one summary list - possibly this list would be very long --- but a long list has more chance to trigger empathy in the reader than a short list without specifics.
Why: the public would see the whole thing in one bit (the longer and more exhaustive the better). Its better to see the full picture and then argue against this sad, mostly dangerous approach.
You know, empathy: if one can see the, probably arguable or non-sensical, reasoning for releasing these perpetrators, they will then feel the tremendous danger represented by this pro-release camp and their followers in courts and elsewhere. Also, the followers would know that such list exists and is updated.
Would that be possible to collect and regularly update this evidence, and make this collection public (names of proponents, quotes, date of publication, police and d.a., court decisions and public comments (with a short description of the case and the court decision)?
And: in this collection, the arguments for release should be enlisted (made by whom and when) in one summary list - possibly this list would be very long --- but a long list has more chance to trigger empathy in the reader than a short list without specifics.
Why: the public would see the whole thing in one bit. Its better to see the full picture and then argue against this sad, mostly dangerous approach.
You know, empathy: if one can see the, probably arguable or non-sensical, reasoning for releasing these perpetrators, they will then feel the tremendous danger represented by this pro-release camp and their followers in courts and elsewhere. Also, the followers would know that such list exists and is updated.
@Tironianae Voter ID should have been there from the outset (ie many decades ago). It should have been the defauld approach.
The more intriguing is this: why voting has not been subject to voter ID so far?
Any stats on Asians, Muslims?
The best thought I read today (and share) on [failed] democracy:
"You can vote for someone, then , when in power , they do things that were never in the manifesto."
--- so, what is democracy? Where are the breaks and balances after the date of voting?
In fact, this chart doesn’t show what Zucman claims. First of all, Zucman’s claim that America hasn’t grown “one iota” faster than Europe is falsified by his own graph, in which the U.S. is ahead of Europe in every category. Second, there is no reason to think that GDP per adult (which I assume means GDP per working-age adult, for the math to work out) is a worse measure of income than national income per adult; the latter includes income from overseas investments, while the former includes only production within a country’s borders.
Third, Europe includes East Europe, which has been growing more quickly than West Europe as it completes its catch-up from the communist era. The major West European economies have all fallen behind the U.S. in recent years.
Source: https://t.co/eNjLoPGXr1
I quoted the above because at least the third argument appears to me as valid.