@kylecato2@iamyourfarmer@Garretgraham007@gavin_spoor This is research from Wheat Tech, a wheat consulting and research company in KY who doesn’t sell stream bars. These results represent an average of 4 years worth of replicated small plot trials.
@iamyourfarmer@Garretgraham007 See the independent replicated small plot data below from Wheat Tech, they are a wheat consulting and research company who doesn’t sell stream bars.
These are averages from 4 years of replicated trials.
The 3 hole nozzles are horribly height dependent and often streak wheat.
@iamyourfarmer@Garretgraham007 The 3 hole nozzles are horribly height dependent and they often streak the wheat as a result.
The replicated data I posted below was independent. Here is more replicated research below from Wheat Tech, a wheat consulting and research company. It’s 4 years of replicated trials.
Big differences this year between phos banded with the wheat seed, compared to the same products (and rates) surface broadcast.
In this replicated trial, wheat was notilled into corn residue with 100 lb MESZ in the treatment on the L of center, compared to 100 lb MESZ on R.
@ChrisJPelzer If you look at some of the data, it suggests that the lower the STP levels - the greater the response to banded P (compared to broadcast). But my experiences lead me to believe if it’s heavy residue notill conditions, we always seem to see a similar response regardless to STP.
Huge thank you to everyone who came out to our Semi-Annual!
We hope everyone enjoyed their time with us and our keynote speaker, Phil Needham!
Here's some highlights👇🏼