Neil James Foster

Just in case there are any doubts, opinions expressed here are my own and not anyone else's!

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

@Legal_Ministry @SSRN @PrawfBainbridge Bad news! I had also been making publications available on BePress until they cancelled individual access. Sad to see open access options for legal scholarship being reduced!

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

Now that I look again I see the things you mention are probably not covered- consulting other student’s notes is fine so long as they are not copied into your answer! You are quite right about enforcing the Berkley policy being quite hard! Interesting to know if they have any suggestions.

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

@jeremy_gans I think the AI policy is excellent. The other things you mention are probably dealt with already by other academic integrity policies.

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

@Natasha_etc_ *knows*...

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

Natasha, as someone who know a bit about Australian law I very much think a High Court appeal should be sought; in my view the judgment is wrong even based on the current SDA, especially the interpretation of the special measures exemption under s 7D. My post here comments: https://t.co/dFQ72MglTu

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

Giggle v Tickle, the Federal Court Appeal- Two Steps Back https://t.co/WIE50ZXh9t via @NeilJamesFoster

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

Giggle v Tickle, the Federal Court Appeal- Two Steps Back https://t.co/WIE50ZXh9t via @NeilJamesFoster

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

An excellent analysis by Kat. I see it turns out she was responding to comments made about the trial decision, not the appeal. But her analysis of the appeal decision is very good. FWIW I absolutely support an appeal to the High Court and would encourage everyone to contribute to funding it. My view is that the appeal court got the current law wrong but we also need amendments to the SDA.

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

@jeremy_gans Ok there it is: https://t.co/5Ygtcg0xcm

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

@jeremy_gans Taking a while to put up the judgment- many of us would like to read the details!

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

@jeremy_gans Correct Jeremy, the civil immunity applicable in Australia (D’Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (2005) 223 CLR 1) was abolished in the UK some time ago- see Arthur JS Hall v Simons [2000] 3 WLR 543, followed by the New Zealand Supreme Court in Chamberlains v Lai [2007] 2 NZLR 7.

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

@jeremy_gans Also author of an important overview of religious freedom in Australia https://t.co/FhS0xTIqze

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

@QcWynter Colin I have posted some comments on the legal issues here: https://t.co/4jyZDkuUsh . Sall sums it up well- the Giggle case is based on the "special measures" exception in the SDA and I think should succeed (but hard to predict!)

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

The Reality of Biological Sex in Law- one step closer https://t.co/4jyZDkuUsh via @NeilJamesFoster

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

The Reality of Biological Sex in Law- one step closer https://t.co/4jyZDkuUsh via @NeilJamesFoster

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

Evidence for the resurrection of Jesus- papers https://t.co/9ZeaECoCQD via @NeilJamesFoster

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

@HusaJaakko Thanks. It seems the bit the court were concerned with was a statement about human biology. Without seeing the whole document surely this was also a statement supported by religious views? Anyway it would be good to see the whole thing. Thanks again for the summary!

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

A LEAP IN THE DARK? EVALUATING THE EVIDENCE https://t.co/E7eCZGrPEh via @NeilJamesFoster

[Neil James Foster @NeilJamesFoster]

A LEAP IN THE DARK? EVALUATING THE EVIDENCE https://t.co/E7eCZGrPEh via @NeilJamesFoster