When Muslim Thugs throw plastic bottles at Police they get no prison time
If a patriot does it he gets two years in prison
Are you seeing the two tier criminal justice system yet?
If you still believe that Russia started this conflict in 2022, then you are either corrupt, ignorant, or brainwashed.
If you don’t know who Victoria Nuland is, or what she was doing in Ukraine in 2014, then you have no idea what’s going on.
The Deep State started this war. It was the Obama CIA/State Dept that funded Nazi militant groups to start a civil war in Ukraine, and initiated regime change to a CIA/State Dept puppet, Yatseniuk.
This was all revealed in the leaked phone call between State Dept diplomats and Deep State agents, Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt (link in next post).
After the Maidan coup in February 2014, the US CIA/State Dept owned Ukraine via proxy, and the CIA began using Ukraine as a giant offshore playground for criminal racketeering and money laundering. Ukraine became one giant CIA base, directly on Russia’s border.
Then the US/NATO began building up Ukraine’s army for the sole purpose of one day fighting Russia. The US/NATO began supplying Ukraine with weapons, equipment, missiles, training, intelligence, etc.
Covert elements within the US government, along with their European partners in NATO, used espionage to overthrow and take control of the nation of Ukraine, then built a massive standing army on Russia’s border, then tried to bring Ukraine into NATO, and thus start WW3.
If you are still buying the official MSM narrative about this conflict, you should not be engaged in conversations.
Everything the MSM told you about Ukraine/Russia has been a lie, and in many cases, the inverse of the truth.
The man on GB News last night advocating for “pro Russian voices” to be thrown in jail, including people saying “don’t go to war for Burnham” has been revealed as Paul Richards.
Richards is Treasurer of the Fabian Society and has previously served as a Labour special adviser.
Just think about that.
A senior figure within Labour was on national television talking about locking ordinary British people up for voicing opposition to war.
People should be extremely concerned when influential political figures start talking so casually about imprisoning people for opposing the government and opposing a war.
This is a threat to our freedom of speech and democracy.
This is happening right now in New York.
Thousands of people transferring their sins into live chickens. Then the chickens are slaughtered and sent to the same stores as any other chicken.
Someone is eating a bird a stranger used as a vessel for their guilt. 🧵 (film link in thread)
The reason the Labour Party refuse to call out far-left political violence is because they approve of it.
They even go as far as publicly smearing peaceful patriots as "far-right" to encourage it.
They know *exactly* what they are doing.
It's dangerous and utterly vile.
Handcuffed Ukrainians are bussed towards the front to die for NATO and Boris Johnson.
Dragged from the streets of "Free" Ukraine, robbed, beaten, brutalised, given a weeks rudimentary training.
Then this. The outcome is sadly inevitable.
Absolute nonsense. Net zero is costing the taxpayer an absolute fortune and it won’t make a blind bit of difference apart from lining the pockets of the corporations who receive government contracts - funded by us. It’s a gigantic virtue-scam at our expense.
"Od trzech lat w mediach słyszymy, że Rosja zaatakowała Ukrainę bez powodu, a my – Polacy – musimy wspierać Kijów, bo to „nasza wojna”. Jednak rzeczywistość jest bardziej skomplikowana. Wojna na Ukrainie nie zaczęła się w 2022 roku, lecz była konsekwencją działań Stanów Zjednoczonych i Unii Europejskiej, które systematycznie prowokowały Rosję, używając Ukrainy jako pionka w geopolitycznej rozgrywce.
Przede wszystkim trzeba pamiętać, że pucz na Majdanie w 2014 roku nie był spontanicznym zrywem Ukraińców, lecz efektem finansowanej przez USA operacji destabilizacyjnej, czyli tzw. „demokratyzacji” Ukrainy. Stany Zjednoczone przeznaczyły miliardy dolarów na zmianę władzy w Kijowie, a nagrania rozmów amerykańskich dyplomatów (https://t.co/zayAfeIhRB. Victorii Nuland) pokazują, że to oni decydowali, kto stanie na czele rządu po obaleniu legalnie wybranego prezydenta Wiktora Janukowycza. Po tych wydarzeniach Ukraina rozpadła się na dwie części – prozachodnią i prorosyjską, a w Donbasie wybuchła wojna domowa. Przez kolejne osiem lat ukraińskie wojsko, wspierane przez skrajnie nacjonalistyczne oddziały, takie jak Azow i Prawy Sektor, prowadziło operacje militarne przeciwko separatystom, co doprowadziło do około 15 tysięcy ofiar śmiertelnych, według danych ONZ. Media milczały na ten temat, bo nie pasowało to do ich narracji.
W odpowiedzi na te wydarzenia, w marcu 2014 roku, Rosja przeprowadziła operację wojskową na Krymie, która doprowadziła do aneksji półwyspu. W referendum, które odbyło się 16 marca 2014 roku, 96,77% głosujących opowiedziało się za przyłączeniem Krymu do Rosji, przy frekwencji wynoszącej 83,1%. Choć organizacje międzynarodowe uznały to referendum za nielegalne, faktem jest, że decyzja ta miała szerokie poparcie mieszkańców Krymu. Dodatkowo ukraińskie władze wcześniej próbowały ograniczyć używanie języka rosyjskiego – w 2014 roku Rada Najwyższa Ukrainy podjęła próbę uchylenia ustawy o językach regionalnych, co wywołało niepokój rosyjskojęzycznej ludności.
Kolejną przyczyną konfliktu była kwestia NATO. Rosja od lat ostrzegała, że nie pozwoli na wciągnięcie Ukrainy do Sojuszu, traktując to jako bezpośrednie zagrożenie dla swojego bezpieczeństwa. Porównanie do Kryzysu Kubańskiego z 1962 roku jest oczywiste – gdy ZSRR próbował rozmieścić rakiety na Kubie, USA groziły wojną. Wtedy ostatecznie statki z sowieckimi rakietami zawróciły, a Moskwa wycofała się pod presją Waszyngtonu. Dlaczego więc Moskwa miałaby pozwolić, aby NATO ulokowało swoje bazy tuż przy jej granicach?
Waszyngton i Bruksela nie tylko ignorowały rosyjskie ostrzeżenia, ale też świadomie eskalowały sytuację. Do 2021 roku Ukraina była intensywnie dozbrajana, a na jej modernizację przeznaczono miliardy dolarów. Rosja uznała to za zagrożenie i zareagowała. Co ciekawe, wojna mogła zakończyć się już w kwietniu 2022 roku – w Stambule prowadzono rozmowy pokojowe, a Ukraina była gotowa na kompromis. To jednak Kijów zerwał negocjacje po naciskach USA i Wielkiej Brytanii. Według mnie wojna była Zachodowi na rękę, ponieważ stała się najlepszym wytłumaczeniem fatalnych decyzji gospodarczych i inflacji w czasie COVID-19. W obliczu rosnącego niezadowolenia społecznego w wielu krajach wojna stała się idealnym pretekstem do dalszych wydatków publicznych i tłumaczenia kryzysu gospodarczego „putinflacją".
Nie można też pominąć kwestii ideologicznej. Rosja od początku mówiła o „denazyfikacji” Ukrainy i problemie neonazizmu, co początkowo wydawało mi się przesadzone. Jednak fakty są niezaprzeczalne – Ukraina oficjalnie czci Stepana Banderę i UPA, organizuje marsze ku ich czci, a prezydent Zełenski chętnie fotografuje się na tle czerwono-czarnej flagi, symbolu UPA. Dla Polski ten aspekt jest szczególnie ważny, ponieważ UPA była odpowiedzialna za Rzeź Wołyńską – ludobójstwo dokonane na dziesiątkach tysięcy Polaków na Wołyniu i w Małopolsce Wschodniej w latach 1943–1945. To nie jest „rosyjska propaganda”, lecz rzeczywistość, którą polskie elity polityczne celowo ignorują.
It’s wild that every single Labour MP in the House of Commons was considered too shit to be leader, so they literally manufactured a by-election to get a new guy in by coup, and he’s still *completely* shit.
LORD KHAN. AFTER HE SAID ABOLISH THE LORDS.
Four years ago Sadiq Khan looked at the House of Lords and said it should be scrapped.
Today he put on the title, swore the oath and sat down.
He does not deserve to be a Lord. He did not deserve to be a Sir. These honours were supposed to mean something. Service. Duty.
A country worth the ribbon. Instead they get handed to a man who spent years talking down the institution, then walked in the minute it had a seat with his name on it.
That is not reform. That is not humility. That is an insult. The man is just a complete hypocrite, what does he actually stand for and believe in because it's certainly not Britain and it's history and culture.
HAMPSHIRE POLICE CHARGE GRANDAD, 76, FOR WEARING A BURQA!!
They didn’t miss him they targeted him and have now charged the
76 year old grandad with wearing a Burqa, seems it's ok for so e but not others typical Two Tier Policing once again.
Not a riot. Not an assault. Not a weapon.
A pensioner in a burqa at a protest.
Hampshire Police warned they’d nick anyone covering their face.
Then they did it. Cuffs on. Charge sheet. Magistrates’ court and charged and having to wait a month untill his sentence on 14th October.
I would say this is surely Islamophopic by the police how can they say he hasn't converted they are just seeing a white man and persecuting him.
Same week the country is emptying cells of rapists and hardened thugs because prisons are full.
Foreign offenders convicted of rape and murder get treated by the police with special treatment and even softer sentences.
A 76-year-old British white man gets the full show for putting on the one face covering the state pretends it can’t see when anyone else wears it.
If a woman walks through town in a niqab or Burqa, that’s “faith.”
If a grandad wears one to make the law look stupid, that’s a crime. They didn’t protect the public. They protected the double standard.
Watch what they do to him. Then ask why they never move this fast for the men who actually hurt women.
Why is it ok for some people to wear Religious coverings but not others!!
Two Tier Policing and Two Tier Religion.
This poor 76yo man is being kept in custody for a month for wearing this...
Let that sink in. Our prison are too full for rapists and child abusers, but no bail for proving the law is an ass.
I hope you hate them as much as they hate you!
▪️Financially punish pensioners
▪️Financially punish disabled people
▪️Financially punish small businesses
▪️Financially punish farmers
But give £655 million to Angola.
Conscription to 65 for men in the UK.
I believe any attack on the UK blamed on Russia will be a huge false flag.
Just like the so called ‘Bucha Massacre’ in Ukraine which was a cover for Johnson scuppering the Ukraine - Russia peace deal in March 2022 https://t.co/Vnoz30kk97
So Angela Rayner is now telling us that people with billions shouldn’t be able to “buy their way into our democracy” after Reform received £72 MILLION from two crypto billionaires.
Okay Angela. Let’s look at what was apparently perfectly acceptable before Reform started winning the fundraising battle.
Labour took £4 MILLION from Quadrature Capital, the investment firm.
They’ve taken millions from wealthy businessmen like Gary Lubner.
Millions from Lord Sainsbury.
Millions from Dale Vince and Ecotricity.
Millions from trade unions over the years. Rayner was actually challenged about that this morning and said union money was “different”.
The Conservatives?
£15 MILLION from Frank Hester and his company The Phoenix Partnership.
£5 MILLION from billionaire businessman Mohamed Mansour.
£1 MILLION from hedge fund founder Alan Howard.
Millions over the years from hedge fund figures, JCB interests and some of the wealthiest people in Britain.
The Liberal Democrats?
Repeated donations from Ferring Pharmaceuticals. Research using Electoral Commission data found pharmaceutical companies including Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi and Ferring funding British politics over the years, with the Lib Dems receiving the overwhelming majority of pharmaceutical-industry party donations in that study.
But here’s my favourite bit.
Christopher Harborne, one of the “crypto billionaires” whose money is suddenly causing all this concern about democracy, previously gave the CONSERVATIVE PARTY around £1.5 MILLION in 2022.
He then gave another £1 MILLION to Boris Johnson’s private office.
Apparently that was fine.
So hedge fund money? Fine.
Pharmaceutical money? Fine.
Billionaire money? Fine.
Corporate money? Fine.
Union money? “Different.”
Even money from the SAME crypto billionaire was apparently acceptable when the Conservatives were receiving it.
But two British businessmen give Reform £36 million each and suddenly Westminster discovers that gigantic political donations might be a problem.
If you want donation limits, introduce them.
Apply them to EVERYONE.
What you cannot credibly do is spend decades accepting enormous legal donations under the rules, then suddenly decide those rules are a threat to democracy when somebody else starts beating you at your own game.
#AngelaRayner #ReformUK #PoliticalDonations #Labour #UKPolitics